This is wrong on so many levels. If that were to be applied, then there would be no support groups, no one to help you or something when needed because by your logic only the person who directly experiences something has the right to complain or protest.
Ah no. My bad because I did not precise what I directly mean by ,,complaining on reforged". I directly mean on technical stuff and performances.
You do not need to own game to see that it is bad. You hear people, you see models and such, you see Blizzard's absence and lack of communication, you see false advertising, and you actually SEE EVERYTHING to know.
But you do not see bugs, slow down, disconnects and such.. You only heard from others. For example, I know about black screens and how it looks like. I know random errors I get, I know many stuff although I did not experienced multiplayer and thus you wont see me arguging or mentioning multiplayer EVER! I strongly believe that I should talk and argue mostly about stuff which I know for sure. Not about ,,what I think but may be different". Those bugs I have experienced when play game, you did not. Now I am giving you example, I never said that you argued about performance yourself. But I have seen many people here doing it. ,,I wont buy Reforged it is piece of crap" - which is true anyway, but start to mention poor performance and bugs. Obviously this is not helping situation and he cannot report any bug! As he does not have game, so he cannot report anything for real. That is why I mean, to technical aspects, those people's opinion should be less valued than ours.
What you experienced directly is they forced you down to download 20+GB of crap in order to play classic! They ruined classic for you, and you have full right to bash them for it and rebel as you did not ask for this.
Hypocrisy is when you say or complain about something but do not do anything to change it for the better. It's not when you complain about something you don't have. That's empathy.
Thanks for explain me what you think. It really helps me lot.
If I complain about you having depression and not try to help you, then yes I'd be a hypocrite but if I do something about it I will not be. I don't also need to have depression so I can not be a hypocrite if I say something about depression, otherwise all doctors would be hypocrites by how you wrote it.
See, I totally get your point. And regarding this case you may be right.
But speaking of medicine itself. it is really questionable. You may have good will to help me, but your actions maybe are not helping me because you do not know certain subject very well, you are not doctor! If i listen you and took some medications for some illness and something, you wont answer to laws because you are nobody to medicine! I do not say this, even it is harsh, but those are not my words. World said that. It is world's system which applied in every single country.
One must pass exam, to study medicine, to get certified for example to be doctor. So if I have some problem (easier problem can be solved at home), then I need to report problem, they set me date to met him. Then after he checks me, he decide what is wrong with me and how to treat it. he has seal, signature and all to mark his opinion, because his opinion matters. I can deny it, by reporting it, then his superiors will set up commission team to question his decision. Yet again those are higher doctors, not people on street whose got modern mentality that ,,their opinion matters"
My mother died 10 years ago in car crash. She was nurse. And my neighbors mostly were lazy to visit doctors, so they bugged her constantly while she was alive for various sicknesses to tell them what to do and what medications to take. Even she was medicine worker, she often sent them to doctors as she claims that she has basic knowledge about certain stuff, she still needed to study more to better understand some problems to more professional level. And her opinions were valued mostly along people, she still sent them to those whose are supposed to have even more valued opinions as they master that that knowledge.
Another case for you. We once installed boiler in bathroom. We called man who does such things. Recently it malfunctioned. We called our neighbor as he is working in electric company. he opened boiler and saw that wires were not connected as they should inside. Electricity could fry us. Then we called our relative whose is IT expert and works for installing telephones, internet and all of that. he saw it and told that we should call certified expert. He also saw that wires are weirdly connected, and we should call specifically for certified electric man. When he came, he also saw (third man confirming this) that it could literally boil us while we were showering. That works, but is not connected as it should by standards and could cause serious injuries if something went wrong. We were lucky that it just broke. Then he fixed problem. When my father talked to man first installed boiler and told him what others said, you know what was his reaction?,, Nah I do not see problem here. Their opinions, their ways, I know how to do and obviously it were not problem. I do what I think it is best." - So it was our mistake to call him instead of certified man at first place.
Third case. One man I know and studied it called me to go to snowy mountain. They gathered to go to snow walking and that craps, for some reason I could not. I was present man who is experienced truck driver (has 65 years, since 18 is professionally driving), suggested him to put winter tires and all relative protection because mountain they went is messy. Guy told him ,,Nah, I do not think it is problem. I drive here in city and roads daily. I can handle this car" and you know what happened? Their tires up there started to slip, he could not drive normally because of ice covered with snow, and once car moved up from road, they hit deep snow! They could die literally because of his ignorance backed up that ,,I have opinion and I know best" Opinions can be dangerous.
I wanted to prove you that everyone can have opinions ,and is better to have many (two brains usually think better than one), but in certain cases only experts, professionals, people whose actually experienced issues should have their opinions more valued. If not, actions taken by ,,just opinions" can be dangerous literally in reality.