• Listen to a special audio message from Bill Roper to the Hive Workshop community (Bill is a former Vice President of Blizzard Entertainment, Producer, Designer, Musician, Voice Actor) 🔗Click here to hear his message!
  • Read Evilhog's interview with Gregory Alper, the original composer of the music for WarCraft: Orcs & Humans 🔗Click here to read the full interview.

Techtree Contest

What theme, and rules, would you like to see?


  • Total voters
    86
Status
Not open for further replies.
Level 48
Joined
Jul 29, 2008
Messages
9,838
~Void~ said:
I honestly think that without theme restrictions we will get loaded with stupid entries. How about Warcraft theme, at least?
Oh wow, just goes to show how short-sighted I can be... I figured this was a given. Yeah, I totally agree; make a freakin' race in the freakin' game, guys. None of this "undersea Elves!" or "flying elephant-people" races. :p

~Void~ said:
I honestly don't see the point in this argument. It won't be mini-races.
I honestly don't see why you can't be open to the possibility of even discussing it. I know all mods are different, but take Gilles for example; even if he goes with Full-Races, I know he has read and understands my side of it, and has discussed it with me. You, on the other hand, have almost completely ignored me with little support.
 
Level 34
Joined
Sep 6, 2006
Messages
8,873
Kyrbi0, I really don't like the idea of no balancing, and I don't think you can compare them with the other races. In the campaign, there are set enemies, and the computers are controlled a certain way. The Naga are not comparable with the other races.
 
Level 48
Joined
Jul 29, 2008
Messages
9,838
Gilles said:
In the campaign, there are set enemies, and the computers are controlled a certain way.
>_> I'm not sure I get that... But I agree with
Gilles said:
The Naga are not comparable with the other races.

~~~

Kyrbi0, I really don't like the idea of no balancing, and I don't think you can compare them with the other races.
Hmm. I agree that with Mini-Races you can't really compare with the others. I just think Balance isn't as important as Design, in this case.
Balance to me is something you take a stab at (i.e. "this ability deals damage and stuns, but for less damage/duration than Thunder Clap, so it should have a slightly lower cooldown and mana cost"), then playtest to get right.
However, if the creator has put a lot of thought into the race, to make it really cool, interesting and unique, I definitely think that should rank higher in this case.
 
Level 34
Joined
Sep 6, 2006
Messages
8,873
>_> I'm not sure I get that
I meant that the Naga race was only balanced for the campaign. It wouldn't be any good for a melee game.

Hmm. I agree that with Mini-Races you can't really compare with the others. I just think Balance isn't as important as Design, in this case.
Balance to me is something you take a stab at (i.e. "this ability deals damage and stuns, but for less damage/duration than Thunder Clap, so it should have a slightly lower cooldown and mana cost"), then playtest to get right.
However, if the creator has put a lot of thought into the race, to make it really cool, interesting and unique, I definitely think that should rank higher in this case.
I just prefer to have balancing, and I can't really explain why. I guess for one thing, I don't want to see a race where each unit has over the top amazing abilities.

It's just your opinion on mine, and as long as we're the only ones in this discussion, my opinion trumps yours. :p
 
Level 34
Joined
Sep 6, 2006
Messages
8,873
I said as long as it was just myself and Kyrbi0 debating. I don't think I've ever actually gone against the publics opinion on any contest.
 
Level 48
Joined
Jul 29, 2008
Messages
9,838
Gilles said:
I just prefer to have balancing, and I can't really explain why. I guess for one thing, I don't want to see a race where each unit has over the top amazing abilities.
Well yeah. I don't mean epic-amazing spells; I mean, like, interesting or creative spells. For example, a Possession-like ability that instead works on mechs and Towers (like "Hijack") isn't game-ending, but it's creative and has some strategy to it, I would think.

Gilles said:
It's just your opinion on mine, and as long as we're the only ones in this discussion, my opinion trumps yours. :p
Yeah. We could sit and argue forever; I don't really care to. I say make it a poll. :p
 
Level 15
Joined
Jul 19, 2008
Messages
1,791
Well i am so going to get owned in this competition mainly because i am not good at making new spells and all of you guys seem to know how, but i am still going to give it a shot. I have to make several races for my new campaign adventually anyways so why not make one of them for this competition. And ive always wanted to play around with the spells so this will be a good chance to learn. So have we confirmed a date yet?
 
Level 15
Joined
Jul 19, 2008
Messages
1,791
full tech all the way. the point of these competitions is to create another playable race that can compare to blizzards 4 races, Isn't it?
 
Level 24
Joined
Feb 28, 2007
Messages
3,479
I thought I could post a list with pros and cons I could think of when it comes to mini vs full races for people who don't care to read trough entire pages to find arguments for and against.

Full race:
  • (+)Easier to balance as you can compare to the 4 already existing races.
  • (+)Will be usable in altered melee maps.
  • (-)More work -> Could lead to less and "worse" submissions.
Mini-race:
  • (+)Less work -> Could lead to more and "better" submissions.
  • (-)Balancing will be an issue, since there is nothing to compare a mini-race too, as there are none already created.
 
Level 15
Joined
Jul 19, 2008
Messages
1,791
Full tech might be more work but if they give us a fairly long timeline then i think that you could get some good entries. and even if you do get some crappy entries, then so what. just dont give them good scores, its not that big of a deal.
 
Level 25
Joined
May 11, 2007
Messages
4,650
Count me in on this one, I've always loved to create new units and stuff.

Voted for no imports and all the themes except medieval :) .
and I hope the races will be judged by their balance and such, not only for how awesome their blink blink jass spells are ;) .
 
Level 48
Joined
Jul 29, 2008
Messages
9,838
I thought I could post a list with pros and cons I could think of when it comes to mini vs full races for people who don't care to read trough entire pages to find arguments for and against.
Let me modify this list a bit...

Full race:
  • (+)Easier to balance as you can compare to the 4 already existing races.
  • (+)Will be usable in altered melee maps.
  • (-)More work -> Could lead to fewer entries, and few, if any, coming to completion

Mini-race:
  • (+)Less work -> Could make the contest feasible.
  • (+)Usable in campaigns.
  • (-)Balancing will be an issue, since there is nothing to compare a mini-race too, as there are none already created.

Also, Linaze, this might interest you.
 
Level 15
Joined
Jul 19, 2008
Messages
1,791
Well if you think about it, you only need like 5 entries to make this competition good. Any others are a bonus. I say 5 because there are 3 winners + atleast 2 others so that ppl actually have to work to win, its not just a guarentee due to lack of contestants. I myself am confirming my entry(as long as i can do my draenei race, And if were doing creeps or open theme then i can). Also LordDz just said that he would enter. and if you guys dont enter then it would be very odd considering that you have spent so much time debating here. And im sure that others will join this contest to. So i think that even if we get less entries with full races, there would still be enough of us to make this a good contest. So it should be full tech.


You cant do naga because they dont have AI so someone would have to make AI for them in order for us to compare it to.
 
Level 48
Joined
Jul 29, 2008
Messages
9,838
Well if you think about it, you only need like 5 entries to make this competition good. Any others are a bonus. I say 5 because there are 3 winners + atleast 2 others so that ppl actually have to work to win, its not just a guarentee due to lack of contestants.
I agree with this.

Chaos said:
I myself am confirming my entry(as long as i can do my draenei race, And if were doing creeps or open theme then i can). Also LordDz just said that he would enter. and if you guys dont enter then it would be very odd considering that you have spent so much time debating here. And im sure that others will join this contest to. So i think that even if we get less entries with full races, there would still be enough of us to make this a good contest. So it should be full tech.
I disagree. I think I will only enter if it's "Mini-Race" (especially because Wc3C might be hosting a similar contest soon..., and I could then do one race for both contests). I argued because I want to see things succeed here.

Chaos said:
You cant do naga because they dont have AI so someone would have to make AI for them in order for us to compare it to.
That makes no sense whatsoever. It's not a matter of AI's or something like that. It's all about balance. You can play the 4 races and have them balanced against one another; but with the Naga you can't, because they are very different (also, they are pretty overpowered, IMO).

(Also IMO, we can compare the Naga and the playable 4, since they could fight equally in the campaigns, by just making the Naga (less units) more powerful).

Also, if it's a Mini-Race techtree contest, I think Naga entries should be prohibited, since
1: It'd be hard to prove that they re-made everything themselves (in the Object Editor)
2: It takes no creativity or planning; what Blizzard made is pretty much "teh shiz".
 
Level 15
Joined
Jul 19, 2008
Messages
1,791
Well it doesnt have to be too long. just long enough so that ppl who have school and other things to do dont have to rush.
 
Level 48
Joined
Jul 29, 2008
Messages
9,838
1. Make each mini-race a bit "overpowerful". That way, it's "balanced compared to the playable four" (since they have more units/heroes and thus more tactics; instead, you have a more powerful, less diverse army).
2. Make them loosely "balanced" (i.e. don't make an ability that Stuns for 10 seconds. Just don't)
3. Maybe we should worry more about how cool the ideas are, or how well they "fit" into whatever race you pick, or how innovative and creative your abilities are (NO, I'm not talking about "blink blink JASS spells", I mean simple Object/Trigger Editor stuff that is useful).
 
Level 15
Joined
Jul 19, 2008
Messages
1,791
Well to tell you the truth we all could sit here and argue this all day but the point is that the majority want full tech including gilles and void so that is what its probably going to be.
 
Level 48
Joined
Jul 29, 2008
Messages
9,838
Well to tell you the truth we all could sit here and argue this all day
We could. But we don't have to. Poll?

Chaos said:
but the point is that the majority want full tech including gilles and void so that is what its probably going to be.
O RLY? ~Void~ is pro-Full races, but all Gilles has said is that he prefers Balancing. He has made no decision either way.
Likewise, there are a number of people who are pro-Mini-race (myself included, of course). We have no idea if it's a Majority.
 
Level 15
Joined
Jul 19, 2008
Messages
1,791
Now that i think about it, i have no idea why im debating for a full race. I wanted to make a full of draenei for my campaign, but i just now realized that it would be way too hard to make a good draenei race without using the same models and buildings several times. And since i will only have one hero in my campaign(akama) Then a mini race would probably benefit me more. Sry for all the debating, lol.

And now that i really think about it, if the theme is creep then mini would be the better option mainly because ppl can make one using only one race and still make it good without a lot of repeated models. If it was a full race then ppl would have to combine several races and then it might not be as useful. Someone could find a much better use of a pure centaur race, instead of having centaur, harpies and razormane all mixed in. And it would be kind of hard for someone to make 16 new and unique hero abilities if you had to make 4 heroes. Also if the limit is only 1 mb then mini races would also be a better option if you want to add in new models, spells and icons for your race.(you have less units to worry about, meaning less neccissary imports)

So i guess my vote would be with the mini races, although i will enter either way. if its full i might just pick a different race and do it just for the fun of it. Again sry for all my previous aguements, lol.
 
Level 15
Joined
Jul 19, 2008
Messages
1,791
Im not saying that the spells themselves are too hard for ppl, i meant that trying to come up with new ideas for 16 spells for the heroes + all the spells for all your other units will be a bit tough. Im a very quick learner. it wont take long before i figure out how to make some myself. lol, so just like kyrbi0 said, it is alot less work to do. and now that school is back in for me i have gotten alot more lazy to do more work then i have to. lol
 
Level 15
Joined
Jul 19, 2008
Messages
1,791
Well i think that we need to have a new poll, instead of debating everything. the poll should be whether you want a theme(creep) or no theme, and if you want mini or full tech. I think that having a set theme would help to avoid the non warcraft related entries like modern and futuristic. but thats just my opinion.
 
Level 34
Joined
Sep 6, 2006
Messages
8,873
Bandits are creeps, so yes, there could be a human type race.

I think we'll go with creeps, file size limit, and full-tech.
 

HFR

HFR

Level 22
Joined
Apr 12, 2008
Messages
3,386
Oh God, accidentally voted in "Theme" and "Race" thinking that this options enable the votes, damn! It's the first time that this happens to me... Always read everything before posting, always read everything before posting, always read everything before posting
 
Level 34
Joined
Sep 6, 2006
Messages
8,873
Oh God, accidentally voted in "Theme" and "Race" thinking that this options enable the votes, damn! It's the first time that this happens to me... Always read everything before posting, always read everything before posting, always read everything before posting
Sorry, but I don't break my word.
-rep

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Please, no whining, I hear it every contest from someone.
 
Level 15
Joined
Jul 19, 2008
Messages
1,791
well there goes 3 ppl that left this competition. i might stand a chance after all. Im just hoping that there is only 3 entries in total so that i will atleast get 3rd. lol.

Well maybe it should be warcraft theme and mini races, we would secure more entries that way. Now im starting to doubt that there will be enough to actually make this a competition. But if you made mini races and warcraft theme, then your guarenteed like 5 entries right off the start.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top