Because you are a small-minded elitist, sorry to say HINDYhat, but you're acting anti-social, if this site would follow the "social" headline you would be banned forever, I would do it.
And? that is not your beer.... the only thing that counts is that you want to prevent people's free will to create GUI spells for contests, and thats anti-social.
I give a crap on that, aslong as people want to submit GUI spells for contest, they should be allowed to, and they should be adequate rated.
Right. If you ask me, GUI should be nuked. Fortunately for you, im not the one in charge. Giving GUI users automatically less points simply because they use GUI would be discriminating. Evening the field of play for every submission by converting GUI to JASS is not discriminating.and the argument that it's not bad for gui users because they can still participate and are not exclide is complete nonsense.
should they celebrate the fact that they get discriminated against by you?
GUI can be converted to JASS with about 3 clicks.
I suppose the man in the wheelchair cannot run faster by spending a few hours learning how to (a new technique, not training his muscles). Well, GUI users can. So its your own damn fault for being lazy and using an inferior approach.It is just like allowing a man in a wheelchair to race a race against the athletic world champion and say: "Well if you run more creative you might have a chance. But still you are slower, so well you suck"
So GUI users DO have a chance. But youre also implying that not all JASS submissions will be both uncreative and badly coded. Bad coding can be fixed by learning (v)JASS. Not being creative cant be fixed for either contestant.Obviously, this won't be possible, except all Jassers are too uncreative and to bad.
I would jizz my pants.Roflcopter said:Then there is no need to allow GUI, since we assume that all GUI users follow your advice and learn jass.
Do you have a sort of disability that prevents you from learning Jass? I mean, if you're spending time on Wc3 already, surely you have enough time to learn Jass. It's a fact that it's better than GUI. They aren't even comparable. So I'm the ignorant and 'small-minded' one for thinking that GUI is terrible, when you don't even want to try and learn Jass?and hindy as well. it's all about acting right or wrong. in your case it is acting ignorant and small-minded.
Do you have a sort of disability that prevents you from learning Jass? I mean, if you're spending time on Wc3 already, surely you have enough time to learn Jass. It's a fact that it's better than GUI. They aren't even comparable. So I'm the ignorant and 'small-minded' one for thinking that GUI is terrible, when you don't even want to try and learn Jass?
As if GUIers stood a chance in the Zephyr contests anyway, even with the old judging.
I'm flattered.redscores said:[...] the jass elitist jerks [...]
Yet almost all of the other stated rules doesn't follow with the spell submission rulesIf a submission does not follow the spell submission rules the creator will be disqualified.
I mean I have an idea in mind, but there are certain conditions for spawning to occur.2. Reanimate (Turns corpses into summoned units around the caster)
Apparently not me^^
Seriously, most of you should have enough sense to figure that one out. =D
Indeed.PurplePoot said:I think that while you can find loopholes in the technicalities the actual meaning of the statement is pretty clear.
I think that's a fair enough description. Anything else, like having an abomination as the projectile to a firebolt spell, is just ridiculous conscious rule twisting.Just_Spectating said:Basically the summon should be of some life form.
But you will receive a lower score in certain areas, I hope?you will not be penalized if you use GUI over JASS.
But you will receive a lower score in certain areas, I hope?
Basically, efficiency should maximum reach a 7/10 and that's in the case where it has no leaks, recycling MUI'ness, and certain custom scripting...
Is the code leakless, organized, MUI, multi-level supporting?
Simple and basic math... 10/10 = 30/30...Jassu said:You're saying that efficiency for JASS-only users will reach a maximum of 10/10?
If that's the case, you may need to elaborate on what the other 20 points will count for in the coding section.
Simple and basic math... 10/10 = 30/30...
Do your math![]()