- Joined
- Sep 2, 2007
- Messages
- 3,723
I invented it myself ... "prank the retard".
This thread would belong in the general gaming forum.
Anyway, to answer your question:
1. Crysis/ Crysis Warhead
2. Dragon Quest VIII
3. Oblivion
4. Dragon Age Origins
5. World of Warcraft
I don't really dislike any of my games, because I only buy what game reviewers recommend. Though I was that annoyed by the combat system in Gothic 3, that I only played it one hour, and then I never touched it again.
Gleeful, please keep on topic god damnit.
My list:
I like:
1. Secret of Evermore (SNES)
2. Lufia (SNES)
3. Secret of Mana (SNES)
4. Monster Hunter Freedom Unite (SNES)
5. Terranigma (SNES)
I don't like:
1. Call of Duty (All parts which are newer as Call of Duty 2)
2. WoW (OH HELL I wasted 2 years of my life time on this useless shit)
3. Car Racing Games in general
4. Crysis (So fucking bad game... just good graphics -.-)
5. Singstar (No Comment)
Aion did NOT take over WoW, and NEVER will.
Tibia...well, everybody has their opinion. Better than Runescape. Most games are.
Obviously, if you played WoW for 2 years, it's not useless. >_>
1. WC3
2. FFXII
3. FFXIII
4. Oblivion
5. AC2
I don't dislike enough games to make a hatelist.
In no particular order
+Fallout 1
+Fallout 2
+STALKER - Shadows of Chernobyl
+Dawn of War II
+Dead Space
-Oblivion (now it's playable, but to be truly enjoyable it relies too much on mods)
-Fallout 3 (same as Oblivion)
-Saint's Row 2 PC Port
-Far Cry 2 (a sandbox and nothing more. Also repetetive)
-Fallout Brotherhood of Steel (Why!? just why!?)
By the way... did you tried the demo of the original Fallout 3 : Van Buren ?
You mean the tech demo? Yeah I did and I found it to be pretty good. However, do not get me wrong. I do not dislike Fallout 3 because it's Fallout in First Person. I'm all ok for Fallout of third person, first person or isometric. My problem with Fallout 3 however are the bugs, the bad gameplay and the horrible writing. Also I dislike Bethesda's animations and character models.
Yeah, I do enjoy the whole finding out what you're actually supposed to do, where you're supposed to go, or generally finding out information on your own aspect of old RPGs. I sorta dislike the guided function in modern RPGs, take for example the compass arrow in Fallout 3. I also hated how the compass in Fallout 3 showed enemy locations.
I think I've never actually played one of these RPGs - besides, what's the difference between pressing a button and bringing up a map as compared to having a compass to follow?
Well, for example in Fallout 2 you had to go throught many different towns and cities to find out the location of Vault 13, rather than just have it pointed on your map. This made the game interesting and made it seem like you were actually digging information rather than just being guided to your location. Also Fallout 1&2 had no objective markers whatsoever. You had to check your mission progress to see where you were supposed to go.I think I've never actually played one of these RPGs - besides, what's the difference between pressing a button and bringing up a map as compared to having a compass to follow?
Well, for example in Fallout 2 you had to go throught many different towns and cities to find out the location of Vault 13, rather than just have it pointed on your map. This made the game interesting and made it seem like you were actually digging information rather than just being guided to your location. Also Fallout 1&2 had no objective markers whatsoever. You had to check your mission progress to see where you were supposed to go.
I did not just mean the compass marker. I meant markers in general, including map markers. They make the game seem too guided and remove the feeling that you're actually doing something to get further.
I disagree redscores - it should be both good graphics AND good gameplay. Like Final Fantasy.
Most games nowadays have awesome graphics and shit gameplay though, and I much prefer it the other way round - rather play some good old game than silly Lair.
I disagree redscores - it should be both good graphics AND good gameplay. Like Final Fantasy.
Most games nowadays have awesome graphics and shit gameplay though, and I much prefer it the other way round - rather play some good old game than silly Lair.
I think graphics are no where near as important as gameplay.. aslong as the graphics are 3d with quality color, it should be fine.
I think graphics are no where near as important as gameplay.. aslong as the graphics are 3d with quality color, it should be fine.
Gameplay > Storyline > Characters > Soundtrack > Length/Replayability > Community (goes for online only, I couldn't care less about the Final Fantasy community to be honest) > Strategical/Tactical elements and PvP > Is there more now? > Graphics
Superman 64