the logical reasoning behind not having a resume is simple. if the only way the normal users can determine the worthiness of a person is through a resume, it can mean 2 things. First, that the person hasnt done enough to be well known for their good deeds in which case, he/she doesnt deserve the vote. Or second, the user voting has not been around here for long or has not been around consistently to know who is more worthy or not and therefore, whatever opinion they might have is empty and meaningless and as well as their vote.
about the candidates themselves. as stated in the first post, the mods did not just pull out these three names out of a hat nor did we have a drinking contest to see who is the most awesome. this topic has been going on for few months in the mod lobby and with it, we've had multiple polls and threads to discuss the merits of each nominee. we took in to account their behaviour(if they fit as a reasonable role model), their general attitude as well as what they have contributed along the year. the three you see are there because they were deemed most worthy, not because they were the coolest or not because we have this mod conspiracy to dominate everything on the site.
if you deem someone to be worthy, if you find none of them worthy, dont vote.