Because I may as well be a staff member.Eccho said:Then why is Rising_Dusk having disabled reputation?
So what if they can hide neg rep? Just give out PM warnings instead of negrep and if they keep breaking the rules give them an infraction.
I'd rather forfeit all of the work I do for the site than wear the crown. Too much obligation comes with being a member of the staff, I'd rather just wing it and help where I can. Poot can attest to that as well.Ash said:So be a staff member, and not someone who has disabled rep![]()
I'd rather forfeit all of the work I do for the site than wear the crown. Too much obligation comes with being a member of the staff, I'd rather just wing it and help where I can. Poot can attest to that as well.
You need 0 =< to give rep.
+4 -12/per time.
+10000000/total.
-10000000/total.
Methinks.
It is not that easy, people are just taking what I said and exaggerating it. If you want your reputation disabled, you need to be a respected member of the community to the point where it is absolutely crystal clear that you will not abuse the feature to dodge negative reputation. It also must be understood entirely that if you break any rules, we will skip the negative reputation step altogether and go right to infractions.Ghan_04 said:> Post in admin contact 'I want my rep hidden' and voila! (Or walaa, whatever pleases you) Your done.
What? Who told you that
I think Ralle just accidentally changed it to 2, then he switched it back to 10. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Either way, you don't want an infraction.
I don't want to disable my rep... I want to disable EVERYONE's rep.
If people need to see my rep, let them, but I just don't want to see those gems at anyone. So when is that option going to be implemented?
It is more in my hands to decide who has acted appropriately enough to deserve it. I then clear it with Ghan and it goes through; my recommendation is enough to pass it through. Ralle has been inactive a bit for some time now, so it's fallen onto us to take care of these things.Ash said:Be in the webmasters favour, imo.
You're wrong, of course. There is a sure fire way to get your rep disabled. Prove to us through your actions and words that you are deserving of it. Everyone who asks for it in admin contact gets a 'background check,' if you'll permit the term's use, by your's truly. If you pass it, you get it. It's that simple.Ash said:The hive workshop isn't serious business, nor is it a cooperation. With that in mind, there is no 'collective voice' or public relations person--however certain staff members think to the contrary--thus there is no sure-fire way to get your rep disabled.
Ash, quit being a pest. You know your belligerent attitude is neither necessary nor appreciated, yet you persist. Have some bloody dignity.Ash said:Just get to know ralle, don't get in trouble and ask him to disable it, or better still; stop bitching about a bloody green/purple/silver/red gem.
That will not be happening.Eleandor said:I don't want to disable my rep... I want to disable EVERYONE's rep.
It won't be. Do what Pyritie suggested if it's that much an impedance to your enjoying the website.Eleandor said:So when is that option going to be implemented?
It has nothing to do with being liked. Trust me. I like some people here who I would never clear for disabled rep and people I think should be banned that I would. It has more to do with your background in the site and how much, if any, negative reputation you have received in the past. Anyone with an infraction can be guaranteed to not be approved for it.deathcom3s said:Volvox, the best way to find out if you're liked enough, is to post the thread asking to have your rep disabled.
It is more in my hands to decide who has acted appropriately enough to deserve it. I then clear it with Ghan and it goes through; my recommendation is enough to pass it through. Ralle has been inactive a bit for some time now, so it's fallen onto us to take care of these things.
You're wrong, of course. There is a sure fire way to get your rep disabled. Prove to us through your actions and words that you are deserving of it. Everyone who asks for it in admin contact gets a 'background check,' if you'll permit the term's use, by your's truly. If you pass it, you get it. It's that simple.
Ash, quit being a pest. You know your belligerent attitude is neither necessary nor appreciated, yet you persist. Have some bloody dignity.
Drama? I've seen more discussion of people trying to understand the system in 7 pages than drama. Have you actually read the thread? Aside from your posts and a slight few others, nothing's really been as you say it has.Ash said:You say you're wrong as if it's a common occurrence, something which isn't quite the case as opinion isn't wrong. I also find it funny, neigh hilarious that you, among with some other people here, have kicked up 7 pages of drama over a couple of 'gems'.
I don't know, we can leave that with the users that ask for disabled reputation to decide. So far, things have been really fair and objective. That's how they should be, right?Ash said:I am thoroughly apologetic for the incorrect name usage, too; I simply thought it lied with Ralle, as opposed to you. Does it really make that much difference?
I do not see what point this paragraph has other than to be aggressive, Ash. What does my position have anything to do with reputation.. The other 'site' issues are being fixed by their respective staff. (Except the stupid map section that no one will do even if I harass them) What other issues are there that need to be addressed? I've got a to do list and everything, and it all seems to be going fine.Ash said:They're gems, dusk, not money. The 7 pages of drama have been fruitless and could've been spent on fixing some of the issues this site has, yet what you just posted has proven how retarded--and I don't mean that in a bad way--the staff's approach--yes, you are a staff member. Regardless if you have a useless title or not; you yourself have even stated that you may as well be one--is to fixing things.
What you perceived and what was present most certainly do not agree in this case.Ash said:You seemed overly aggressive in that post, I guess it's just a one off; we all have bad days.
Dusk said:I do not see what point this paragraph has other than to be aggressive, Ash. What does my position have anything to do with reputation.. The other 'site' issues are being fixed by their respective staff. (Except the stupid map section that no one will do even if I harass them) What other issues are there that need to be addressed? I've got a to do list and everything, and it all seems to be going fine.
I don't think I've been treating them like money or anything. As a matter of fact, I have only been explaining things, not complaining at all. I disabled my reputation without so much as a hitch and now others want to know how to do the same. I think it is the right thing to do to inform them how they can do it. Do you not agree?
Also Dusk said:What you perceived and what was present most certainly do not agree in this case.
Yeah, that's my fault. I can't post in news. I agree with you there.Ash said:Lets be honest, it's been 7 pages of nonsense because things were enacted without explaining what was happening to the userbase beforehand.
That's not for me to decide, and I really don't want to alienate any of the other staff members. Everyone does something, I just don't think most know/care exactly what it is that needs to actually be done.Ash said:Certainly you'd be better suited for the job as opposed to a leader that doesn't have a clue?
I consider friendly discourse hardly a waste of time. It's not like it takes very long to whip up a sensible response to a post -- at least for me. Your call, though, I won't respond here on in.Ash said:This discussion, too, is also fruitless. To prolong it would be to condone baiting, and also waste even more time. We're both busy people--I need to get back to writing my novel on the meaning of life!--and this is certainly something we could do withoutv