- Joined
- Nov 8, 2007
- Messages
- 2,263
just a little pointer to jigrael/tarrasque.
me and anarch just thought it was a lion rather than a bear. the face is almost def a lion and bears aint digitigrade as well
just wanted to point that out before you furthered your design
ok. this is how i explained to kwah and he seemed to understand it enough well. and i dont think he even cared for the model contest.
the shield above is NOT a rook. it doesnt even look like any sort of tower. HOWEVER, it does have that characteristic crest that rook pieces have. it is also a shield which means it is sturdy like a solid building/tower. therefore, even though it may NOT be related to rook in terrms of what it is, it is a good representation of a rook, both visually and functionally.
now. a werewolf. a generic one will definitely not pass for a knight. for obvious reasons. but if the person were to design it in a way that visually relates to a knight, then i would say it is a representation of a knight.
please dont tell me we are going to have to spoon feed you and explain to you how each visual/functional aspect might relate to the chess pieces.
PEOPLE WERE NOT SUPPOSE TO MAKE LITERAL CHESS PIECES. they could if they wanted to. but that is fucking boring
me and anarch just thought it was a lion rather than a bear. the face is almost def a lion and bears aint digitigrade as well
just wanted to point that out before you furthered your design
I'm... Sorry? D:
I understand that it's all about artistic representation and such, but... This seems to be stretching it a bit too far? I have nothing against it, Jigrael's models are wonderful, and I can see why it would correspond with a Rook; But I mean, this is like making a werewolf and calling it a Knight because they both resemble animals.
Although, I admit I didn't really make the connection between "strong, firm" etc and a rook at first because I was slightly tired.
Moving on please?
ok. this is how i explained to kwah and he seemed to understand it enough well. and i dont think he even cared for the model contest.

the shield above is NOT a rook. it doesnt even look like any sort of tower. HOWEVER, it does have that characteristic crest that rook pieces have. it is also a shield which means it is sturdy like a solid building/tower. therefore, even though it may NOT be related to rook in terrms of what it is, it is a good representation of a rook, both visually and functionally.
now. a werewolf. a generic one will definitely not pass for a knight. for obvious reasons. but if the person were to design it in a way that visually relates to a knight, then i would say it is a representation of a knight.
please dont tell me we are going to have to spoon feed you and explain to you how each visual/functional aspect might relate to the chess pieces.
PEOPLE WERE NOT SUPPOSE TO MAKE LITERAL CHESS PIECES. they could if they wanted to. but that is fucking boring