DISCLAIMER: I have read only the first page and the last page, none more. Thus, some stuff here may be repeated from earlier. (EDIT: reading the rest of the thread, editing as I go)
EDIT: on page 7, I'll give it a rest for awhile, I'll cover 8+ another post.
I vote god is an invention.
Why?
Well, here comes the cliché opening; if god loves everything, (or whatever...) what's up with the majority of the world?
Second; We can see from documents such as the Dead Sea Scrolls that (Christianity) twisted their religion to give the church more power by making Jesus into a god as opposed to an ordinary man, and such. If god was real, why would he let people use him to their own advantage, (party) to get money? (Don't tell me at least parts of (some) religion aren't a scam for money, such as back when they sold you time in heaven, and the church collection plate...)
Next; If the bible is some document of god or whatever, why does it advocate random murder, contradictory statements, etc?
And I want to see a "Yes: I can prove it with logic" answer

(if it was provable, it would have been proven ages ago)
Im only going to say:
When you can prove to me he/she/it doesn't exist, I will prove to you he/she/it does.
Imagine what society would be like if everyone thought that you had to disprove anything, not prove it...
Disprove that you killed my second cousin, thrice removed! Gl hf.
Perhaps you should practice what you preach Hakeem. Afterall most evolutionists are biased against any idea of Creation, or God for that matter. And most books in support of Evolution are biased against God as well.
You really should be, if you're trying to make something based on fact and not faith...
I can merely look on at the unknowingness of humanity. And nod my head in sadness
What's funny is that this is coming from a christian [/bash]
(Sorry, no offense, but I couldn't resist)
If you prefer to think that way, then realize that they choose ignorance.
I'm sorry, but that's just as arguable (if not more) against you.
ponder this one question for everyone.
If God is real. (which I believe, but thats irrelevent to the question)
Then what will happen to you?
You'll be really disappointed, and have wasted a lot of time, if he doesn't, so that goes both ways.
And isn't he supposed to forgive everyone that asks?
Also, I haven't been smitten to date
Not scientifically, but logically.
But not everyone accept logic as fact, little do they realize that logic must be true in order for science to prove anything.
Logically proven? I'd like that logical proof in type.
Who knows? God might favor evil people and just not tell us.
So we're evil because you don't like our opinion? Jeez, standard religious argument much?
Pinch yourself. What felt that? Your saying chemical reactions have something that feels? All chemical reactions feel? There is nothing in the brain that accounts for why we experience pain. And who knows when it enter? It doesn't matter when.
Yes there are. They're called nerves.
My point was: Should it matter that I kill you if there is no such thing as a soul?
Not if you don't mind spending a lifetime in jail.
I think Christianity has saved human existence, when it was first founded, it preached peace, which is extremly important, something the world needed, and it in turn saved lives, made peace.
But when people go kill in the name of their religion, then they go too far. The Crusades were stupid, and now sometimes religion can be an excuse for something.
Sorry, but I have to disagree that making life hell for the pagans, screwing up the Roman Empire, burning people at the stake, persecuting jewish people etc, etc, were very productive effects of Christianity.
I don't dispise Christianity. To me the Bible is a story book with a powerful and important moral, that people have decided was composed of facts and not stories.
I used to agree with that statement, but now I've seen things from the old testament that make my stomach turn. Also, if you want to preach a document, it's all or nothing, so it's not fair to say you can't count those bits.
Another answer: Spacebar says that he would go to Hell. (I ignored the "I dont know")
No, you told Spacebar he would go to hell because you don't agree with his religious inclinations.
And science has'nt proven that God does not exist my friend. But do not blame Christianity for those who tell lies, make wars, and make false/evil uses of the Bible's teachings. Fore they are not true Christians. They are basically people who hide behind the church door and claim to be Christians.
Apparently the church isn't christian, then? Uh-oh, who will you turn to now?
Redeemer: Excuse me but...That quote is wrong.
And the reason evil and sin exist is because:
1: Satan's rebellion against God.
2: Because man decide to rebel against God also, and thus doomed himself to Hell if he doesnt repent.
3: Because Satan is going to experience his judgment in the end. Satan has yet to pay for his crimes against God. And in the end God will basically put him in prison. Thus God let him live so that he can pay for his crimes. Other than that angels (even fallen ones) are able to exist outside of Heaven or Hell.
But we should probably not discuss Christian Doctrine in this thread. Because I dont want to get in trouble....Again.
EDIT: unless Hakeem allows.
All that did is that prove that everything redeemer said was right; you're turning your faith into facts.
True, someone can never prove anything. This is the same with logically proving God. You can only say that God has not been dis proven.
Math can be proven, but that's about it.
That is true donut. True indeed.
But you must also look at the otherside of the coin.
"If a statement P implies a statement Q, and a statement R also implies Q, and either P or R is true, then the Q has to be true."
Or perhaps the famous quote.
"Eliminate all other factors, and the one which remains must be the truth."
You conveniently forgot to consider the case of both P and R being false.
GST: The gods of Egypt never gave me salvation, nor have they ever answerd my prayers as God has.
But even so, the archeological evidence is only half the equation. Peoples personal experiences of God's power is the other half.
And even so. The God of the Christians and the Jews has been around since......forever.
Christianity came around 30 AD, as far as I recall.
Also, surely your Christian god has answered your prayers and given you salvation, eh?
SuPa: You must'nt forget though. That the bible also contains versus describing the workings of the planet, not quite known. (the world being round was known, but these are different examples)
"Were other cosmologies found in religions have the world on the back of turtles, or the earth being the result of a fight between gods, biblical revelation is quite consistent with science. This is not to say that the Bible is vindicated by science; rather, it is science that is vindicated by the Bible. Consider the following: (note: all quotes are from the NIV)
The Spherical Shape of the Earth - "He sits enthroned above the circle of the earth, and its people are like grasshoppers. He stretches out the heavens like a canopy, and spreads them out like a tent to live in" (Isaiah 40:22).
The Hebrew language did not have a word for "sphere." Circle is quite sufficient.
The Earth is suspended in nothing - "He spreads out the northern [skies] over empty space; he suspends the earth over nothing" (Job 26:7).
The Stars are Innumerable - "He took him outside and said, "Look up at the heavens and count the stars -- if indeed you can count them." Then he said to him, "So shall your offspring be" (Genesis 15:5).
The Existence of Valleys in the Seas - "The valleys of the sea were exposed and the foundations of the earth laid bare at the rebuke of the LORD, at the blast of breath from his nostrils" (2 Samuel 22:16).
The Existence of Springs and Fountains in the Seas - "In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, on the seventeenth day of the second month -- on that day all the springs of the great deep burst forth, and the floodgates of the heavens were opened" (Genesis 7:11). See also Gen. 8:2; Prov. 8:28.
The Existence of Water Paths (Ocean Currents) in the Seas - "O LORD, our Lord, how majestic is your name in all the earth!...When I consider your heavens, the work of your fingers, the moon and the stars, which you have set in place,...You made him [man] ruler over the works of your hands; you put everything under his feet...the birds of the air, and the fish of the sea, all that swim the paths of the seas" (Psalm 8:1,3,6,8).
The Hydrologic Cycle - "He wraps up the waters in his clouds, yet the clouds do not burst under their weight" (Job 26:8).
- "He draws up the drops of water, which distill as rain to the streams; the clouds pour down their moisture and abundant showers fall on mankind" (Job 36:27-28)
- "The wind blows to the south and turns to the north; round and round it goes, ever returning on its course. All streams flow into the sea, yet the sea is never full. To the place the streams come from, there they return again (Ecclesiastes 1:6-7).
The Concept of Entropy - "In the beginning you laid the foundations of the earth, and the heavens are the work of your hands. They will perish, but you remain; they will all wear out like a garment. Like clothing you will change them and they will be discarded" (Psalm 102:25-26)."
This also makes the point that just because we believe in a God does not mean that we (most Christians) are utterly against science.
Or maybe Christianity adopted science and then
claimed to be the inventor of it. And it's pretty obvious that there are bajillions of starts everywhere.
That is also true Donut.
Teh_Ephy: Alot of those are not vague at all. They are quite plain and simple. And being supported by pillars....is suspended by pillars. Not by nothing. And you are leaving out one very important verse. The one with the valleys of the sea. And springs and fountains of the sea....are just that springs and fountains. Just because it isnt described in mathmatical formulae and super enhanced resolution HD camera detail with the scientific names of the specific phenomenon does not mean its vague and archaic.
Evidence remains valid.
Twisting the truth makes your argument no more valid than it was.
I may be wrong, but it seems to me that lots of what donut says (like the 1+1=7 thing) have been jokes. (True in a way, (of course you can create your own number system) but a joke in idea) I'm surprised no one else seemed to see this.
Anyways people, don't we already know that only mormons get in to heaven?
