- Joined
- Dec 7, 2008
- Messages
- 823
bounty hunter2 has gone for his holiday break. I was wondering who will be the new map moderator till he is back & when he will be announced? Any ideas by the staff?
What's another 100?Which'll result in a hundred more pending maps. :/
What do you propose we do? Don't say hire more people. If people right for the job were here, we'd ask them.
Another possible solution would be to give a few other staff members the ability to moderate maps. Even if they rarely reviewed, it'd definitely help.
Otherwise, if these reviews enjoy the staff's ultimate trust, we might aswell bestow a Moderator rank on the reviewing user.
I had another moderator in mind, but he's not as active as I thought he would be.bounty hunter2 has gone for his holiday break. I was wondering who will be the new map moderator till he is back & when he will be announced? Any ideas by the staff?
I'd prefer if you used the Map Mini-Jury. Using the Map Resource Moderation forum is just going to flood it, and the social group is inactive.If you want to help out, posting reviews then linking them in the Map Resource Moderation section (say, in one big thread) can be incredibly helpful.
(...)
Sure, we can bestow the rank at them. Then again, would they use the power they have been given at the right way?
Being a good reviewer doesn't mean a person have good responsibility.
He obviously doesnt know how to calmly handle and give critic, which create problems such as harrassment, down voting and fights, some of which iv seen and heard of, since Septimus constantly complains about them on his side.
And frankly, his English disturbs me.
It is very true that Map Moderators should not only be criticising, but also giving positive feedback and tell what are the good sites of a map. If a Map Moderator give only things that have to be improved, it doesn't give the Map Maker any power to continue. I for example demand that when someone is going to make a review, he should give negative and positive sides of the map. Then I know what are the good points and what have to be improved.
Exactly, you say it sucks. Thats your problem to solve. My point is NOTHING.. I repeat. NOTHING to do with you receiving, I repeat again. NOTHING. READ what i wrote. =_=There is a clear line between constructive and non-constructive. I could accept everything the staff and rising_dusk told (Sometimes me and them would jokes with one another) whenever they critic my map simply because they know how to give a constructive review. How can a critism could be acceptable when a user barely say "It sucks" without any valid reason?
If you ever bother to visit the map section once in awhile, you would notice at the ample amount of resources that violate rules and user who do not bother to fix the errors upon being told to do so.
If you do not like the way on how I or somebody else review a resources, then you yourself should have volunteer to help instead of saying "oh, he is not qualified cause of bla bla bla". We need action at here, not a bloody useless chatting saying who are qualify to be the next mod and who isn't which are not happening at here.
I dont care. irrelevant to my point.As long as we have 1 active mod that would frequently check the resources, that would be fine. Do you have any idea how long it could took to even check 1 simple map?
I dont care. If you are going to represent an English site, talk proper English.Not everybody speak English as well as you do.
irrelevant. I have a right to criticize as its already a form of contribution if you dont notice.You seem to cause more problems when moderating let alone when you are reviewing user maps, thats my point.
Prove it? I think its pretty obvious with all the personal wars between you and your so called "review" targets. You whine and bitch about them constantly and they whine and bitch about you constantly.Prove it or else it would just be a false claim by you.
Prove it? I think its pretty obvious with all the personal wars between you and your so called "review" targets. You whine and bitch about them constantly and they whine and bitch about you constantly.
And honestly, the site does not need this behavior at all. Id like for you to prove otherwise after I sample afew of your clients opinions.
Doesn't matter much to me either way, so if you want to try and get it moved there then go ahead.I'd prefer if you used the Map Mini-Jury. Using the Map Resource Moderation forum is just going to flood it, and the social group is inactive.
I will naturally be reading them and possibly giving the map a peek.I somehow think that the Map moderator will have to test the map to check if those reviews are valid, so the workload is hardly decreased. Otherwise, if these reviews enjoy the staff's ultimate trust, we might aswell bestow a Moderator rank on the reviewing user.
It's quite a shame that we don't have enough qualified people to do the job, as being an active map moderator will obviously require a lot of time and work. I'd add redmarine and APProject to the list too though.
And who would that person be?I had another moderator in mind, but he's not as active as I thought he would be.
[...]
I for one, would like a team of at least two map moderators (excluding Rui). This is a quick list of people I'd think could be considered. Granted, I haven't read many recent reviews since I've taken on the spells sections. Oh, and this list is quite large because I'm not even close to capably distinguish qualified from non-qualified members.
- -Septimus
- -CMarket (Cinematics?)
- -CloudWolf(?)
- -HFR (Melee Maps?)
- -Linaze(?)
- -Zelda.Alex(?)
Another possible solution would be to give a few other staff members the ability to moderate maps. Even if they rarely reviewed, it'd definitely help.
I fully agree.The map section is going trough a bit of a crisis, but we should not promote moderators out of a rush. If there would be a new mod, it would be a expeirenced member with some good maps and known for excelent behavior and the ability to give good constructive criticism.
No. I just wanted to know if the staff had decided on someone. I had though Septimus or someone from Map mini-jury would have been chosen. The discussion about proposals of name just came up.Oh and Zelda.Alex, are you hoping to become a map mod trough this thread?
I don't know a bit about world editor. Not a bit. Not one thing.No offense againt Zelda.Alex, Im sure he's a great reviewer and maybe even a great GUI/(v)JASS user but he has no resources and has only been here for 9 months. It is up too the mods to see whether he is capable of becoming a mod, but I'd rather see a more expierenced mapper like Septimus do it.
That is a incorrect HFR.So, Alex is the guy. He reviews almost every map, sometimes even more than bounty.
No, I am not.Resources doesn't matter. He was some melee maps and is one of the most important user here.
Resources doesn't matter. Rui has some melee maps and is one of the most important user here.
I understand that fully.Thanks for clearing up soem things Zelda.Alex. I think its very important for a map mdo to ahve extensive knowledge of JASS or GUI, as for most maps the coding is very important. But as we need help for the mods, I hope Zelda.Alex keeps up his great work.
Yeah. You just edited your post. Yes, Rui is important member.I was talking about Rui...
So when do you take that "Left" out & replace it with "Returned"?In summary, we are waiting for me to accept the position of reinstated-reinstated-reinstated map moderator.
Really? Isn't Hive more agreeable now or is it same from your point of view?Not sure, Zelda. I've never gotten around to changing it.
I noticed that. But are there chances that it is going to change in near future?So-so, really. There's quite a few good things going on now, so it's better than it was.. I'm inactive in the forums, and basically just use the chatroom at the moment.
I had another moderator in mind, but he's not as active as I thought he would be.