when the map section will....

[Kino]

Hes not agreeing with you....

 

[Ironside]

Wait, are you guys still thinking I vote them for approval because they have a quest menu or multiboard?

I said it before but it seems I'll have to say it again, I write the basic information a map has and doesn't have, the rating is based on the map itself not the information I write.

 

[Vengeancekael]

So it's not actually a review. Good god ...

 

[Linaze]

Wait, are you guys still thinking I vote them for approval because they have a quest menu or multiboard?

I said it before but it seems I'll have to say it again, I write the basic information a map has and doesn't have, the rating is based on the map itself not the information I write.

So you just write random mumbo-jumbo about the map and then, based on how good you thought it was, you approve or reject, but you never actually say why it was approved/rejected? That's a new way of reviewing maps, a new and horrible one.

 

[Vehster]

Ironside there is no use replying here for everyone helps Linaze.

 

[Deolrin]

Man, read between the lines, I said >>> moderators shouldnt be too strict in order to approve a map, maybe you'll be asking what's the difference?...

I am contradicting you statement.

 

[GhostThruster]

Vehster, grow a pair.

Ironside, if you're going to write a brief review, please at least write a good one.
Or better yet, don't write a brief one and make a proper one.

@Linaze:

What I'm trying to say is that a Pending section, like we have now, will funnel out the shit for users to download safe, secure, and non-time wasting maps.

The virus was a bad example, I give you that. I meant it just saves the time of users, and also potentially protect them from getting other nasties (like viruses).

 

[Jazztastic]

Vehster, grow a pair.

Ironside, if you're going to write a brief review, please at least write a good one.
Or better yet, don't write a brief one and make a proper one.

@Linaze:
The virus was a bad example, I give you that. I meant it just saves the time of users, and also potentially protect them from getting other nasties (like viruses).

Lololol. Vehster's gonna flame you for that now.

I agree with you tho

 

[Vehster]

No need to flame a empty spot Beef. =)

Ironside has enough trust of a mod to do simple reviews and the users can ask him how he did his reviews so I see nothing wrong with it.

(I figured something out, there is no use replying to empty spots or commonly known as trolls for all it does is cause harm to everyone else and trolls can be successful here.)

 

[Deolrin]

the users can ask him how he did his reviews

Excuse me... What?

Also... Are you saying that everyone is a troll, except for you and Ironside? So everyone who disagrees with your opinion is a troll?

Yes. My avatar is a troll. Ha-ha. Very funny.

 

[GhostThruster]

No need to flame a empty spot Beef. =)

ur kewl. srs.

so I see nothing wrong with it

Yes you have a good point. I agree with, you, Ironside's review was simply amazing.
From the poorly explained and identified points, to the lack of any details, insightfulness, or any relevance to his rating (as he so gloriously said himself), his review system is nothing short of perfect.

Yes. My avatar is a troll. Ha-ha. Very funny.

ur kewl. srs.

 

[Ketsuno Anson]

But dedobe,are you not? xD

 

[Jazztastic]

Excuse me... What?

Also... Are you saying that everyone is a troll, except for you and Ironside? So everyone who disagrees with your opinion is a troll?

Yes. My avatar is a troll. Ha-ha. Very funny.

God this thread is fucking hilarious. Btw since when did "empty spots" become another name for troll? It's longer, not as much fun to say, and certainly a lot less fullfiling to be.

@Deolrin, I lolled at the "my avatar is a troll" part.

@Vehster, the main purpose of a review is to be clear and provide feedback to both the creator and users wishing to download. If you need to ask the reviewer for more information then the reviewer isn't doing his job correctly.

@Ironside,

 

[Vehster]

Deolrin there is no use replying to you if you didn't get what I meant at first.

Exactly Beef however sometimes the user can't understand and must ask, so.... I don't see the problem again?

Most reviewers have been doing their job correctly and a lot of the maps in pending section shouldn't be approved mainly because the users are not updating them anymore, the maps ironside reviewed are year old or more maps which I see no problem with short reviews..........

 

[Jazztastic]

I'm sorry if I came across as a troll to either Ironside or Vehster. Just trying to lighten the conversation with a little spiderman humor. My sincere apologies.

 

[Vehster]

Your not a troll Beef... =)

 

[Jazztastic]

Your not a troll Beef... =)

Yeah that spiderman thing was hilarious
Before you troll someone please learn something about that person.

Yeeeeeah . . . Anyways I'd still like to extend my sincere apologies to Ironside in the offchance I offended him

 

[Ketsuno Anson]

The whole hive needs a new system...same goes to the other resources,once approved,they just dump it there and leave it to rot,instead of improving it,they make new ones.

 

[Skycraft]

I just wanted to create this completely useless post to tell you guys that yes, I'm still doing random reviews. I'm not the best but at least it's a review. :3

• Ruins of Dalaran
• Bewitched Forest
• The Eight

And as an added note, stop recycling shit.
:3

 

[Vengeancekael]

Oh are we advertising our reviews now?
No it's cool, I won't, I'll let you have this peaceful moment of glory.

 

[Ketsuno Anson]

Better then leaving it there for us to smell it

 

[LordDz]

If I post images of monkeys all over a review, but give it a 4/5, is that a good review?

 

[-Kobas-]

Will you spare more
http://www.hiveworkshop.com/forums/1625454-post3.html
http://www.hiveworkshop.com/forums/1662971-post48.html
or less
http://www.hiveworkshop.com/forums/1595440-post2.html
http://www.hiveworkshop.com/forums/1591517-post5.html
time working on review I don't care.
I will accept any opinion and award good one.

note: Don't freak out when you found map mod rating different from yours.

 

[Bugz]

Voted for approval? dude.. you are the guy that set it to approved.. that's what we should write, not you!

 

[-Kobas-]

Check date, I posted such reviews 1 year ago when map section was alive.
I wasn't mod then

 

[Bugz]

Oh oh , well it looks nice, can we have permission to use these x)?

 

[-Kobas-]

Sure, use anything you want

 

[GhostThruster]

@Vengeancekael: lol u

 

[Linaze]

If I post images of monkeys all over a review, but give it a 4/5, is that a good review?

You need too also write "has a quest log" to make it a good review.

 

[Bugz]

If I post images of monkeys all over a review, but give it a 4/5, is that a good review?

Check -kobas- old reviews for idea's

 

[-Peper-]

Lol @Linaze.