- Joined
- Jul 24, 2009
- Messages
- 5,630
You'reyou're
You'reyou're
My entry,
The Undead
I was never good with time differences
If it is ok with everyone it would be much appreciated
Otherwise,
Please use this entry then : Link
It was a fully workable version (The final one just had some visual improvements and fixes)
Nobody seems against it.
So, we'll use your final version you posted.
Not a big deal since it was only a few hours.
I was never good with time differences
If it is ok with everyone it would be much appreciated
Otherwise,
Please use this entry then : Link
It was a fully workable version (The final one just had some visual improvements and fixes)
How exactly does it save time?Judges, you should all test the maps together on bnet, that way saves time
How exactly does it save time?
I will test the multiplayer maps with someone else, but not with the other judges, and not on b.net.
Normally only one other person, yes.someone else meaning only one person? some of the maps probly need more than just 2 players
Normally only one other person, yes.
However, if one of the contestants specifically says it has to be played with more, I will play it with up to 4 people. Not more though.
But really: that's only if they ask me to, otherwise I'll play it with 2 players (including myself).
is the table updated? because when i went to play knight race, half the map was blank.
I'm sure there's at least one map that requires multi player.
Still, every mapper has to take the amount of players into account.But that's rather inaccurate. ><
What if there's a 12 player map? They're basically screwed, because you'll tell them the map's gameplay is bad... But you can't know for sure, because if it's made for 12 players, it's MEANT to be played with 12 players.
Kind of like playing Azeroth Wars with anything less than 12 players.
i agree, mine is also quite boring when played with 2 playersMine requires multiplayer lol and it probly has to be more than 2 players
more players = more fun xD
Why don't judges play those maps with each other? I think it's the easiest way![]()
Okay, then I withdraw as a judge.Uhh...
Then in my honest opinion, you are not a good judge.
If you cannot test the map properly, then you shouldn't judge it at all. And most maps are MADE to be played with a specific amount of players, not just with 2 or 4. A much better compromise is to play with all the judges, their friends and any empty slots filled with randoms from Battle.net or Garena.
I just don't.Why don't judges play those maps with each other? I think it's the easiest way![]()
Just close this one and create poll oneoh hey guys what's going on in this thre-WHOA SHIT
Just close this one and create poll one![]()
I'll be testing this out by myself, if you don't mind. Most of the maps I've seen are either SP or still functional with 1 P. However, if the need arises, I can test multi-player.
It's the opinion of someone on the hive. This contest isn't just for the judges and the contestants, if anyone here blames a judge for being biased, then it could turn out in a drama over the winner. He thought I wasn't a good judge, so let's try to avoid that who-really-won-drama by creating a drama now.And it would be great if you won't mind the "honest opinon" of a guy who doesn't even participate in this contest.
My point is: if a map really needs full house to be fun, then you deserve to lose points in the category "enjoyability".
Of course: playing with more could be more fun, but a set amount of players is just complete bullshit.
I have never seen a decent game where you had to be with over 4 players to have fun.
Even 12-player maps, such as Footmen Wars, can be fun when played with 4.
But I won't waste my breath on this any longer.
I won't judge, as I will only play with the people of my choice. And there are only 3 people I wish to play with.
let's try to avoid that who-really-won-drama by creating a drama now.