- Joined
- Jul 29, 2008
- Messages
- 9,839
Hm. I feel like, done right, social media *can* be a complement to regular forums.
Yeah I wish.I agree. Yet, I personally do not do that.
Anyone born before or after 1990 will have brain enough to use the omnibox (or its equivalent) of his/her web browser by typing fac hiv, because he/she is a bit busy, and because he/she knows that the omnibox will instantly give him/her the URL to any page he/she already visited at least once in the last four months (configurable in the options menu of his/her web browser iirc)
View attachment 289395
...that is, if he/she has not already added the page to his/her Favorites.
Address bar - Wikipedia
Egg of Columbus - Wikipedia
Hm. I feel like, done right, social media *can* be a complement to regular forums.
I love the classic forum format; THW is good enough as is without glued on social media "channels".
Some people imho hardly (/never?) leave their social medium/media of choice. It can be for various reasons: lack of free time, not wanting to leave their "zone of comfort", digital addiction, staying with the same friends...But since pretty much everyone on the hive knows how to find a facebook page, as you pointed out, do we really need to advertise that it exist? it is pretty redundant as "Rob's fish and tech" in Small Town has a facebook page.
It is simply expected these days.
I am not surprised at all, because I knew that already. For people are alike all over...[...] You'd be surprised over how utterly incapable most of my teachers were during my first 10 years of school. (in terms of technology) [...]"
I am unsure how this relates to being able to use some piece of software.[...] And no - I do not live in Uganda or another stone age country. (believe it or not) [...]
Since its initial release in December 2008, Google Chrome has kept bringing major improvements to web surfing overall. Therefore, the other browser developers had to adapt and evolve. Likewise, people should adapt and use their browser(s) differently?
[...] Hmm well Facebook is in essence just a forum, centered around self-promotion and data gathering, so no Facebook really doesn't serve a purpose, other than checking a box for SEO. [...]
In a post on the previous page, I said that maybe it is a question worth asking: is being on Facebook worth it for THW? (in terms of public image, visibility, popularity or whatever else).[...] But all of this is rather irrelevant for the discussion about icons, other than the conclusion that we can save on the icons, by removing or down-prioritize Facebook.
, I do not remember ending this sentence with a question mark.[...] Likewise, people should adapt and use their browser(s) differently?
No. I do mean Google Chrome.
Ironically the previous, most innovative web browser was imho Opera, up to and including v12.18. But it has always remained a niche software (3-4% marketshare iirc, sigh!)
In a post on the previous page, I said that maybe it is a question worth asking: is being on Facebook worth it for THW? (in terms of public image, visibility, popularity or whatever else).
I also said "maybe in another thread".
@RED BARON: regarding what you quoted,
, I do not remember ending this sentence with a question mark.
![]()
Yeah, sorry for more or less hijacking this color thread Ralle.Yay for browser wars... Seriously guys, what the heck. This is about the color of the social media icons. A super important topic!