TWIF - Custom Chat Icon Contest #1 - Concept Art

anarchianbedlam · Aug 27, 2010

Ya, almost done on the judging... i think

The World Is Flat · Aug 27, 2010

Ok. PM the results to me.

(aswell as post them)

anarchianbedlam · Aug 29, 2010

:A NOTE BEFOREHAND:
Before you see my judging, I would like to say that, TWIF never really posted a judging criteria or number/point system. So I improvised in a manner of speaking. My judging/scoring system is sort of a spin-off of other 2d art contest criteria. But i tried to focus on what would make something good "CONCEPT ART". Thus you have to look at what makes something a good CONCEPT and what makes something good ART by definition.

Concept: an idea of something formed by mentally combining all its characteristics or particulars; a construct.
Art: the quality, production, expression, or realm, according to aesthetic principles, of what is beautiful, appealing, or of more than ordinary significance.

x/10-Originality - Is this concept unique? Something new or interesting that hasn't been done before multiple times?
x/10-Theme - Does the entry fit into the theme? Does this unit look like it would be from warcraft 3? Would you expect to find this unit in warcraft 4?
x/15-Proportions/perspective - Are all body parts/props proportionate? Are all relative sizes believable? (for example: having golfball size fists but biceps the size of bowling balls?)
x/15-Color/texture/shading - Do the colors make sense? (example: is a stealth unit wearing bright pink?) Or, if it is a black/white picture, did the artist include texture and shading? (example: fur or leather or metal?)
x/10-Professional Appearance - Does this piece or do these pieces of artwork look professional? Does it look like the artist spent time in creating it? Or is it a scribble on a napkin? (Clean lines, no smudges or scribbles, overal appearance)

Sorry it took so long to judge, but i had to read through that wc4:legacy of the damned lore and stuff, make sure it fit with the story TWIF made (there's no point in having a concept that wont be in the game) Anyway, judging is done. Thanks to all contestants for entering, everyone did great, keep drawing and practicing... and all that.

Contestant : Kimberly

Originality___________07/10

Theme______________06/10
Proportions/
Perspective__________14/15
Color/Texture/
Shading_____________12/15
Professional
Appearance__________08/10

Total_______________47/60

I'm not exactly sure how original this is. No one has made a troll boar master before, but it almost looks like a troll shaman. The name "boar master" makes me think of a Shepperd. Which leads me to wonder how effective a Shepperd would be in battle. I mean, would this unit summon boars? Theme-wise, i think it will fit in alright, but I'm not sure if it would be used as a hero or a regular unit. From an artistic perspective, i think this one is one of my favorites. He's striking a cool pose and everything seems proportional. Trolls are strong but very limber and gangly creatures. They remind me of the Disney animated Tarzan. Strong but agile. The shading you did and texture you implied are phenomenal. Looks grade A, but i would have loved to see ALL of it textured/shaded.

Contestant : Enjoy

Originality___________04/10

Theme______________04/10
Proportions/
Perspective__________15/15
Color/Texture/
Shading_____________13/15
Professional
Appearance__________09/10

Total_______________45/60

World of Warcraft beat you to it. Tauren Death Knight has been done. And with that being said, it doesnt really work into the theme too well either. According to TWIF's story, the lich king was becoming weaker when his frozen throne cracked. So a death knight, while not impossible, would be unlikely if the Lich King's powers were waning. I would say though that you have the best perspective/proportions in the contest. The tauren looks strong but not cartoony. All the colors fit perfectly, except that it looks rather muted. It's also a bit stereotypical, yes we know deathknights are black and blue and scary.... but it works. The hair/fur looks great and the armor looks like metal... very dull and worn metal, but at least it has a bit of texture.

Contestant : Mr.Goblin

Originality___________04/10

Theme______________09/10
Proportions/
Perspective__________12/15
Color/Texture/
Shading_____________11/15
Professional
Appearance__________07/10

Total_______________43/60

It's an Orc Shaman. What else is there to say? it's already a unit in wc3. Except this one has a different skinned pelt on it's head. But since it's already a unit, yea, it'll fit perfectly in the game. Looking at all the pictures, it looks like you got the proportions and perspective down pretty good. The feet and the left fist seem a tad bit small but otherwise fit a bulky Orc body. There is so much incredible detail in the pictures and the sculpture. Perfect skin, fur and even the feathers look great. But i would have loved to see that great texture on the ENTIRE picture and not just 30% of it. What you did finish looked professional enough, it just needed to be finished.

Contestant : ShiiK

Originality___________07/10

Theme______________05/10
Proportions/
Perspective__________11/15
Color/Texture/
Shading_____________10/15
Professional
Appearance__________07/10

Total_______________40/60

A slutty female voodoo doctor? Meh, not exactly a cookie-cutter unit, but I've seen it before. I have no idea where this unit fits into the project. If it's forsaken, then she should be undead. It cant be the humans, because they don't use evil magic. And it's unlikely that the burning legion would use a voodoo doctor. The burning legion has always used more direct brute strength evil magic. The entire unit is shaded nicely and the colors seem to fit well... if look a bit bland. But nothing really has any texture to it. The skin is smooth, the tattoo is glossy, The voodoo doll is velvet instead of burlap. the belt isn't leathery and the hair looks like play-dough. The body is proportionate for the most part. Except for the minuscule hands and that bulbous eyeball. Both of those things just somehow ruin it for me. I know you said that the eyeball is "suppose" to be a "mask" but masks usually cover most if not all of the face. The "masks" worn by superheroes (example: batman/robin) cover the area around their eyes but have openings that they can see out of. If the eye is painted on the so called "mask" then she would not be able to see out of it, and hence it would be a blindfold (like illidan has) and not a mask at all. At any rate though, who would paint an eye on their blindfold? it confuses people and looks too big.

Contestant : ike_ike

Originality___________08/10

Theme______________07/10
Proportions/
Perspective__________10/15
Color/Texture/
Shading_____________07/15
Professional
Appearance__________05/10

Total_______________37/60

Pretty original, A flying dual-blade-weilding blood elf warrior. You see humans with swords and orcs with swords but you really dont see too many blood elves pick up the weapon. Which by the way, i love the shape of the swords. There is very little if any shading, and no texture at all, but the colors go well together. The actual outcome is rather messy, but it does get the overall design across. And that is the main point of concept art.

Contestant : Pyramidhe@d

Originality___________07/10

Theme______________04/10
Proportions/
Perspective__________09/15
Color/Texture/
Shading_____________08/15
Professional
Appearance__________06/10

Total_______________35/60

It's like if the rifleman and a felhound had a baby. I don't think that this would exactly fit into the lore. I didn't think that felhounds would be domesticated/trained enough to strap a weapon onto them (i would assume felhounds would be bestial) And with that being said demons don't have guns and dwarves don't have felhounds :/ On top of that i just find something inherently wrong with the concept. It just doesnt work. How does the felhound reload it's gun? If it's flintlock then it doesn't have a clip. The felhound doesn't have opposable thumbs to pull back the hammer for it to fire. And where do the bullets go anyway? the barrel covers it's mouth so does the felhound run around with a mouthful of leadshots and gunpowder? (lol, funny picture in my mind of the felhounds head just fucking exploding when it tries to shoot someone) Anyway, the legs look strange to me, (left front leg is thinner and has more joints than the right front leg) And the texture looks like a glossy plaid. :/ I think you could have done better pyra.

Contestant : Nara-Shikamaru

Originality___________04/10

Theme______________09/10
Proportions/
Perspective__________08/15
Color/Texture/
Shading_____________07/15
Professional
Appearance__________05/10

Total_______________33/60

It looks like a pretty standard Draenei, except that he is now carrying a sack of gold, some logs and a ridiculous tool. I actually like the idea of an axe/pick combo ( and yes, lol, it's a pick-axe) but for both tool heads to be facing the same direction on opposite ends of the handle would make it incredibly awkward to wield. to use either a pickaxe or an axe you need leverage, and you cant get proper leverage if you slice your thumb off when you try to get a grip. Theme-wise though this model makes perfect sense. It's the working class of the "syndicate of the outlands. Blood elves are magic users and naga aren't suited well for ground combat/labor. Art wise, the artist attempted texture/shading, i can see the wood grain and a shine on the gold and a sort of light/shadows on the body, But it seems rather half-ass. Everything is uneven, the shadows aren't smooth or blended well at all. And the textures are not defined very well. There are a few proportion mistakes that bug me. One foot is larger than the other, his right armpit is on top of his pectoral muscle, instead of behind it. And the right arm has a large sharp triangle for an elbow. Overall it seems like a mediocre entry at best. It's not utter shit, but it's nothing fantastic either

Contestant : M0rbid

Originality___________07/10

Theme______________02/10
Proportions/
Perspective__________09/15
Color/Texture/
Shading_____________06/15
Professional
Appearance__________04/10

Total_______________28/60

Sure, it's an original concept. But because it's completely made up, it doesn't fit into the lore or storyline at all. It is a complete "throw-away". Because it doesn't connect with anything pre-established, but also has no major role to play. No one would notice if it was there or not. Artistically speaking, it looks completely unfinished. the hands, feet, tail and left leg are blurry silhouettes. Most of the body has a nice fur texture on it. But beyond that, it looks like a 5-10 minute project before getting bored.

Contestant : WherewolfTherewolf

Originality___________05/10

Theme______________06/10
Proportions/
Perspective__________07/15
Color/Texture/
Shading_____________05/15
Professional
Appearance__________04/10

Total_______________27/60

I am not entirely sure what i am looking at here... i mean, i know that it is suppose to be a blimp or zepplin or something. But I cant say that i see a cockpit to drive this thing. I dont see what that single giant gear is attached to, or where the smoke for those smokestacks is coming from. The propeller in the back looks like it's literally 90 degrees to the right of where it is suppose to be facing (strait back). It's not colored and it looks like there is very little shading. I know it's a "Wip" but it's blurry and undefined and confusing.

Contestant : kola

Originality___________04

Theme______________07
Proportions/
Perspective__________05
Color/Texture/
Shading_____________04
Professional
Appearance__________04

Total_______________24/60

Muscular Demon-man... Not really original. But it does fit with wc3, it almost looks like archimond. Proportionately uneven. It looks like there was an attempt to show defined muscles, you can see the biceps, but the forearms are sticks. And i have no idea what is going on with those crooked wings. It isn't colored... i don't know if that's because it's suppose to be a lightly-white ghost on a black background or if the artist was just too lazy/didn't have time to put color in. I can see a small attempt at shading, but the light source is undefined.

Contestant : supertoinkz

Originality___________04/10

Theme______________04/10
Proportions/
Perspective__________05/15
Color/Texture/
Shading_____________05/15
Professional
Appearance__________03/10

Total_______________21/60

It's the pope but in blue armor. And i can't really say how this would fit into the game. The humans never had religious leaders. There were religious warriors (paladins), but not really any priest/deacon/pope system in place. The chest is too flat, the right arm is jutting out too far, one foot is sticking WAY out there which leads me to assume that one leg is longer than the other. And you have a nice little "

" smiley face for a head with no neck. There is some shading on the blue armor, but this is obviously an unfinished product.

Contestant : vosty

Originality___________06/10

Theme______________06/10
Proportions/
Perspective__________03/15
Color/Texture/
Shading_____________02/15
Professional
Appearance__________01/10

Total_______________18/60

*cough*.... well, the back story made it more... interesting. And there have been hybrids in the wc3 lore before, so it could fit in well enough. But as for the picture itself, it has no shading, texture, color, it's disproportionate and i think i can safely say that it isn't the most "professional" looking, (partially because it's drawn on lined paper)

kola · Aug 29, 2010

Muscular Demon-man... Not really original. But it does fit with wc3, it almost looks like archimond. Proportionately uneven. It looks like there was an attempt to show defined muscles, you can see the biceps, but the forearms are sticks. And i have no idea what is going on with those crooked wings. It isn't colored... i don't know if that's because it's suppose to be a lightly-white ghost on a black background or if the artist was just too lazy/didn't have time to put color in. I can see a small attempt at shading, but the light source is undefined.

just saying, that was a fast sketch i made, There is nothing completed in my drawing

it was supposed to be a wip but I didnt finish it.

anarchianbedlam · Aug 29, 2010

I know, there's nothing wrong with that, i was just going by the list of contestants army-of-pandas put up

The World Is Flat · Aug 29, 2010

ALL (except anarchian) judges, please repost the results of your judging, with the total score of each contestant, and i will aggregate. thanks.

WherewolfTherewolf · Aug 30, 2010

I am not entirely sure what i am looking at here... i mean, i know that it is suppose to be a blimp or zepplin or something. But I cant say that i see a cockpit to drive this thing. I dont see what that single giant gear is attached to, or where the smoke for those smokestacks is coming from. The propeller in the back looks like it's literally 90 degrees to the right of where it is suppose to be facing (strait back). It's not colored and it looks like there is very little shading. I know it's a "Wip" but it's blurry and undefined and confusing.

I ran out of time, I figured by not doing past a wip I wouldn't have been judged at all, I'd rather not have submitted such a terrible piece of art to a contest, sorry about that.

The World Is Flat · Aug 30, 2010

it was awesomes.

Deolrin · Aug 30, 2010

There's a slight tiny problem. Not all the judges judged by the same criteria. How are you going to solve this?

The World Is Flat · Aug 30, 2010

Agregating the total end score for each contestant.

Deolrin · Aug 30, 2010

You don't get it huh? Some judges gave, for example, a maximum of 50 points, some gave 25 some gave 100. How are you going to make it even? You should have thought of it before.

Pyramidhe@d · Aug 30, 2010

multiply the score to match them up?

Azeroc · Aug 30, 2010

The best way to do is get percentage from each judge scores and then sum em up and get average percentage for each contestant.

For example in anarchianbedlam's judging, Kimberly's score is 47/60 - you already got the answer, just divide contestant's score with max score and you will get percentage in decimal form. The result is (of Kimberly's score) 0.783333333... - Basically 78%.

The World Is Flat · Aug 30, 2010

I acually happen to get it. if everyones judging on one person is equal to.. 156, and on another it is equal to... 167.. thats how it works, its not like grey nightmare did each person differently, as long as they use the same techinqe for all people, adding up the sum is fine.

#1:

30/50
67/100
22/60

= 117 / 210

i belive that works fine.

Deolrin · Aug 30, 2010

But they DIDN'T use the same technique, that's the thing.

The World Is Flat · Aug 30, 2010

I also dont really... *cough* mind *Cough* each judges score is a equal part of the total... so... its fine.

Deolrin · Aug 30, 2010

But what if a judge gave 50\50 to a contestant while another judge gave 35\35? That would make no sense, since both received maximum points yet the first judge's judging is actually worth MORE points than the second judge's judging. Thus it makes one judge 'overpowered', and have a lot more power over the final results.

M0rbid · Aug 30, 2010

Whait what? TWIF? Mathematics?

The World Is Flat · Aug 30, 2010

That is why i will be AVERAGING the totals and results.

Deleted member 157129 · Aug 30, 2010

Just do percentage like already mentioned. Average percentage, sure, but average total doesn't work.

Contestant X:
Judge 1 - 46/50
Judge 2 - 21/25
Judge 3 - 85/100
Judge 4 - 42/50
Makes 92 + 84 + 85 + 84 = 345/400 = 86%
Not 46 + 21 + 85 + 52 = 204/225 = 91%

I am sure you actually understand, but you're not giving us the impression you do.

Azeroc · Aug 31, 2010

shiiK said:
Just do percentage like already mentioned. Average percentage, sure, but average total doesn't work.

Contestant X:
Judge 1 - 46/50
Judge 2 - 21/25
Judge 3 - 85/100
Judge 4 - 42/50
Makes 92 + 84 + 85 + 84 = 345/400 = 86%
Not 46 + 21 + 85 + 52 = 204/225 = 91%

I am sure you actually understand, but you're not giving us the impression you do.

It does work, average total in percantage is just simple calculation.

For example there are 4 judges, and one contestant. When you calculate judging results you get (eg.): 56% ; 70% ; 62% ; 55%

All you have to do is (56+70+62+55) / 4 = 243 / 4 = 60.75.

So contestant has average total score of 60%.

Deleted member 157129 · Aug 31, 2010

Azeroc said:
It does work, average total in percantage is just simple calculation.

For example there are 4 judges, and one contestant. When you calculate judging results you get (eg.): 56% ; 70% ; 62% ; 55%

All you have to do is (56+70+62+55) / 4 = 243 / 4 = 60.75.

So contestant has average total score of 60%.

You didn't even read my first sentence.

Azeroc · Aug 31, 2010

shiiK said:
You didn't even read my first sentence.

I did. I thought you said you can't calculate the last end result in percentage.

Deleted member 157129 · Aug 31, 2010

Well, what I did try to punch through is that percentage works. I just didn't specify that it's percent for each of the numbers in the "correct" example.

Contestant X:
Judge 1 - 46/50
Judge 2 - 21/25
Judge 3 - 85/100
Judge 4 - 42/50
Makes 92 + 84 + 85 + 84 = 345/400 = 86%

Literally means:
92% + 84% + 85% + 84% = 86%

Walle · Aug 31, 2010

This thread is getting way too complicated for me

DDDDDD

The World Is Flat · Aug 31, 2010

LOL. ok.. ok.. i'll do it your way.

Grey Nightmare · Aug 31, 2010

Ok TWIF requested I repost my judging, I apologise if it's to wrong criteria or unfair or anything, I don't have time now with college starting to rejudge them, so if you want to discount mine and get another judge or w/e please do!

http://www.hiveworkshop.com/forums/1651776-post155.html

Panda · Sep 1, 2010

This contest needs to be judged and removed, its been so long.

The World Is Flat · Sep 2, 2010

Army-of-Pandas, would you please repost your results with the total?

Vosty · Sep 20, 2010

.......

Deleted member 157129 · Sep 24, 2010

TWIF, didn't Amry-of-Pandas already send you the judging in a PM anyway? I can't see why you need him to post it, but if it's so important that all judges post here, I suggest you just ignore Army-of-Panda's judging and finish this contest with the other two judges' opinions. This really needs to get wrapped up.

The World Is Flat · Sep 25, 2010

Sigh, i guess. i'll do it tomarrow if somone reminds me, cba atm.

Panda · Sep 26, 2010

What do you want me to post? i already send you a PM.

Deleted member 157129 · Sep 26, 2010

Army-of-Pandas said:
What do you want me to post? i already send you a PM.

The PM. He wants you to post the judging. Probably as a way to prove it is your judging and not TWIF that has manipulated the numbers.

The World Is Flat · Sep 26, 2010

Not that i care if you think i am manipulating them. seeing as its a private contest.

WherewolfTherewolf · Sep 26, 2010

Ends - July 6th

............

anarchianbedlam · Sep 26, 2010

lol, if it's a "private contest" then why dont you just arbitrarily name a winner and end it already instead of dragging this on for 3 more months

The World Is Flat · Sep 26, 2010

Sigh, maybe i should then >

fine, i'll just do that. remind me in 50 million years to post my results.

The World Is Flat · Sep 28, 2010

36/50

Originality - How original is your concept?
This category was hard to judge, the idea isn't original in the sense
that there were Draeni workers in the wc3 campaigns. However. You have done
very well in making it original otherwise, showing the tool it would use,
the way it would dress, changed it's skin colour and shown examples of how
it would carry resources.

7/10

Colour - How was your use of colors? too bight? not enough contrast?

I like the use of green, it differs from the typical blue or grey Draeni of
WOW and Wc3, however I think in some places it does get a bit bright, a darker, less
sickly green would've been more pleasing to the eye.

6/10

Shading - Does your art have detailed shading?

The shading is rather impressive in some areas, you've used shadows and ighting
fairly well, but I often find the shading is a bit too sudden, each highlight
contrasting too much with the one beforehand.

7/10

Details - Is your art detailed? is your art just a smudge?

The detail on the logs, cloth and gold are pretty good, the shadows add some
depth to the image. The wrapping/detail lines on the chest, don't perform as I believe you intended, they stand out "too" much.

6/10

Theme - How well did you follow the theme?
You pretty much nailed the theme, this is a very useful and realistic concept. Well done.

10/10

37/50

Originality

Nothing amazingly original here, a human girl holding a puppet and wearing kinky barbarian clothes.
Ah, I guess it's not that bad... But it's not particularly groundbreaking either.

5/10

Colour

Brilliant. The contrast is great, the tones are great. My only complaint is the blue and that's
personal preference so you won't lose marks for that, however The face mask could've been a bit lighter, it stands out more than it should.

9/10

Shading

Again, near perfect, smooth, progressive, shadowed. I can't fault much at all here.

10/10

Detail

The detail on the tattoos, belts and well the whole picture really is simply epic. However
the anatomy is a bit out, the eye a prime example. The hair could've done with some more highlights
to.

9/10

Theme

I don't really see this fitting into Sc2Wc4, don't get me wrong it's a great drawing, in a nice pose and would work
well as concept art for another project but the idea just doesn't seem to fit anywhere, MAYBE as a mercenary hero or
campaign character, I suppose a Thermorian general who spends to much time with the orcs. You have to push your imagination.

4/10

39/50

Originality

If we ignore (WoW? I am guessing Tauren can be death knights..? I never played it)
It's a fairly original concept and it's executed well. I can imagine that is what a Tauren
Death Knight would actaully look like if it were in WoW/Wc4. However at the end of the day it's
just two ideas merged into one, so won't get full marks.

8/10

Colour

Loving it, dark and moody, steel/evil coloured armour, lovely tone of blue, light enough to contrast but
not so bright as to hurt the eyes, although tiny bit more variation wouldn't have gone a miss.

9/10

Shading

Definitely the strong point of this piece. I can't flaw it.

10/10

Detail

After looking at some of the other entries, I think you could have gone a bit further with this.
Nevertheless what level detail there is done well.

8/10

Theme

This is original and good for a concept, but it's just not wc4.

4/10

34/50

Originality
The first thing I thought of when I saw this was, 'wtf is it?' I think that alone makes this worthy of...

10/10

Colour
Yeah, well there isn't an awful lot of that.

2/10

Shading
Considering the lack of the above, the shading is done very well. The way you
bring out the ribs, shoulder blades and directional light is pretty astounding.

8/10

Detail

The attention to detail on the face and hair is what won points here.

7/10

Theme

I thought at first it was very original then I thought it looks/seems and acts rather like a Satyr.

7/10

PENDING REVIEW (Need to talk to TWIF about how I mark shading on a scultpture

)

35/50

Originality - How original is your concept?
Eh, to me it looks a lot like a witch doctor or something. However I can see where your coming from with the whole
troll boar master.

6/10

Colour - How was your use of colors? too bight? not enough contrast?

The colours are fantastic, there is nothing particuarly unique or fresh, but the blizzard troll theme of blue skin and fur and leather
apparel is hit spot on. Not a shade out.

9/10

Shading - Does your art have detailed shading?

The shading is very impressive, however it isn't consistent, only the top half of the image seems "done".

7/10

Details - Is your art detailed? is your art just a smudge?

Again only half the image seems to show proper detail, whether this was intetional or you ran out of time, depsite this
what detail is there, is amazing. The fur strands, the hair strands, the tusk crevices etc.

8/10

Theme - How well did you follow the theme?
It would fit, but I personally don't think it's quite as imaginative as some of the other "concepts".

5/10

27/50

Originality - How original is your concept?
I must say I am not 100% sure what this is supposed to be, some kind of dreadlord/demon hunter mix? Well it must be fairly
original if such is the case.

7/10

Colour - How was your use of colors? too bright? not enough contrast?

Not much to say here, although the contrast of black and white is nice, it'd be unfair to give you too many points for it.
Side Note: I would really like to see this coloured, if you plan on finishing it outside the contest.

2/10

Shading - Does your art have detailed shading?

It's minimal but rather effective, especially considering the lack of colour variety.

6/10

Details - Is your art detailed? is your art just a smudge?

I think considering the stage you left it at it's actually rather detailed, the muscles are good and don't look out of place.
The facial expression is very genuine etc.

6/10

Theme - How well did you follow the theme?
It does look like something out of Warcraft, though I can't see it bringing anything new to the game. As mentioned above
it looks like some cross between a demon hunter and dreadlord. It would good for a campaign hero perhaps.

6/10

11/50

Originality

Not Really.

4/10

Colour

I'm afraid I can't give you anything here.

0/10

Shading

Nope.

0/10

Detail

It's not completely bland.

3/10

Theme

It's ok, just about pheasible.

4/10

30/50

Originality

~~It's an elf with two swords. Not very original in my books, sorry.~~
It has teh wings n lobs the swords, like boomerangs?!? O.O

~~4/10~~
7/10

Colour

Better, the red is good, just like blood elf armour, good choice of tone. The brown contrasts
well and is used appropriately. The green is very sickly/bright but is used minimally
and does more good than bad.

6/10

Shading

There isn't a lot that I can see, the skin/stomach has made a good start, as has the armour it
could've done with some further work though.

5/10

Detail

Again, it seems unfinished, the proper detail is minimal.

4/10

Theme

It does fit the Warcraft theme and could be used for a unit
or hero.

8/10

43/50

Originality

It's uh-riginal there is no doubt about that.

9/10

Colour

Good use of colour all round, well contrasted and appropriate.

9/10

Shading

Again very good, easily one of the best in this category.

10/10

Detail

Generally very good, the musket body and skull cap are pure epic. Although it's back hairs and feet/claws would
have benefited from more attention and some of the white lines, especially nearer the face could've done with less opacity.

8/10

Theme

At first I thought you'd lost the plot a bit, but now I know it's a musket I'm thinking this ain't a half bad idea.

7/10

29/50

Originality

It's not 100% original, but like nara, you've done a very good job of updating
an old concept and giving it something fresh.

7/10

Colour

Once again not a lot I can say here.

1/10

Shading

Fairly effective use of pencil shading, you seem to progress nicely and know
where to shade and by how much.

7/10

Detail

Your attention to minute detail isn't amazing, but the overall drawing is very
neat and orderly, you've included the bolts, wooden poles on the sails etc.

6/10

Theme

A fairly useful concept, it's a fresh looking remake of an old classic, something
that may definitely be of some use.

8/10

11/50

Originality

It's basically a priest, we have one in every wc3 so far.
You can have a few points for his "new look".

2/10

Colour

...

1/10

Shading

Wow, there is actually a bit of shading on the coloured bit!

2/10

Detail

It could've done with fine tuning...

1/10

Theme

Well, it is concept and it does fit the lore.

5/10