- Joined
- Sep 2, 2007
- Messages
- 3,723
... okay.
i think you should remove the option to give perma infractions.
i think you should remove the option to give perma infractions.
... okay.
i think you should remove the option to give perma infractions.
Personally I don't get how a 2-point system will work any better than a 10-point; in fact, it's far less flexible. If we wanted to be more severe with punishments, we could just give out more points.
What the HELL!!!
Yeesh! Today i was felling really good and then you kill me, what did i do to deserve to be banned??! I felt like i was finally starting to fit in when the ban counter shoots through the roof...this is my favorite site in the whole universe! the community is nice, people are actually funny, and its resourceful. And I (am attempting to) promote possitivity with my signature. Yes, those who break the serious rules shuld be banned, but still..."innapropriate characters"??? I got that from just putting out some Japanese that i had learned in school... you guys have some sorta hatred for Japan? then i get multiple infractions for ONE THING, flaming, 3 infractions all on the same thread that now says it's "N/A". I try to be nice but when i just try to enjoy the rest of the (about) 70 years i still have to live. Plus i've worked very hard to get the little amount of reputation points i currently have.
I'm sorry if it sounds like im bitching...but this is just stupid...
OK I even got it in all of three hours:
|N/A| |06-20-2008| |04:24 AM| |Rui| Do not flame.
|N/A| |06-20-2008| |02:33 AM| |Pyritie| Flaming.
|N/A| |06-20-2008| |01:15 AM| |Septimus| Do not join the flame, use the report button instead.
Erm... Wow, we should give one infraction only just for one sole reason...
NOT THE SAME REASON... Poor guy...
Read my statement carefully. It is negative reputation, not infraction.
At current system, 3 infraction eventually result to banned.
Multiple account usually would get permanent banned if mod/admin confirm about it.
What the HELL!!!
Yeesh! Today i was felling really good and then you kill me, what did i do to deserve to be banned??! I felt like i was finally starting to fit in when the ban counter shoots through the roof...this is my favorite site in the whole universe! the community is nice, people are actually funny, and its resourceful. And I (am attempting to) promote possitivity with my signature. Yes, those who break the serious rules shuld be banned, but still..."innapropriate characters"??? I got that from just putting out some Japanese that i had learned in school... you guys have some sorta hatred for Japan? then i get multiple infractions for ONE THING, flaming, 3 infractions all on the same thread that now says it's "N/A". I try to be nice but when i just try to enjoy the rest of the (about) 70 years i still have to live. Plus i've worked very hard to get the little amount of reputation points i currently have.
I'm sorry if it sounds like im bitching...but this is just stupid...
OK I even got it in all of three hours:
|N/A| |06-20-2008| |04:24 AM| |Rui| Do not flame.
|N/A| |06-20-2008| |02:33 AM| |Pyritie| Flaming.
|N/A| |06-20-2008| |01:15 AM| |Septimus| Do not join the flame, use the report button instead.
shut up you...my comp lags whenever i try to edit that shit...and the icons shuld tell enuf by themselves and i told u NOT TO GIVE ME SHIT so go give bad comments to someone eles moron
People get +20 rep from one post, so I don't see how -3 is all that much.Oh... Anyway, still a bad thing to do... -3 reps in one thread...
It's two, not three. : )Read my statement carefully. It is negative reputation, not infraction.
At current system, 3 infraction eventually result to banned.
Multiple account usually would get permanent banned if mod/admin confirm about it.
Infractions are designed to not be earned off like rep, though. That is part of the reason that the two (rep and infractions) are separate in the first place.Volvox said:I think there should be a positive version of infractions(something like + & - rep) so if you help the site in some way(by uploading a great resource or something), you get an infraction removed. That would inspire people who really want to be here to actually fix their behavior.
I think there should be a positive version of infractions(something like + & - rep) so if you help the site in some way(by uploading a great resource or something), you get an infraction removed. That would inspire people who really want to be here to actually fix their behavior.
If you get an infraction and then prove to be really helpful to the site, you could always post in admin contact and try to get it reversed.
Most infractions also have a time limit, so they will expire eventually. Unless you've been really bad, it's not permanent.
If you get an infraction, it will stay with you. You can ask to reverse them, but unless they were wrongly given they will not be reversed.Pyritie said:If you get an infraction and then prove to be really helpful to the site, you could always post in admin contact and try to get it reversed.
People can change, you know.
Like me, my old acc=dhk_undead_lord >.<
So you created another account to avoid the infraction?
I think they are in all cases where an infraction is genuinely necessary. At least now with the new system, anyways. Also, Anachron's administration contact and discussion is legitimate. He was given a second chance by Wolv and Ralle.brad.dude03 said:Yeah, I don't think permanent infractions are necessary all the time.
Somewhat correct. The problem is that now vB won't let them change their user title to anything other than "Banned".
I want to test by giving someone 2 infractions then immediately reversing them to see if this fixes the problem, but I don't want to try so I don't get yelled at.
It was how she used the system. It was legitimate when she did it.Yeah, it looks like Kimberly made all of her infractions perma. Dunno why.
No, it still requires a moderator to initiate the process.automated banning?
That would be one incident. After the flame war you would be punished. If you were warned during the flame war, but continued, then you might very well get harsher punishment.i can imagine someone getting banned pretty fast by getting ina flame war with a mod or stuff like that
They are. The changes do not affect the moderators judgment.imo bans should be for heavier offenses only
Now we adjust the amount of time. Before it was too subjective, in my opinion.Personally I don't get how a 2-point system will work any better than a 10-point; in fact, it's far less flexible. If we wanted to be more severe with punishments, we could just give out more points.
If they don't fix their behavior, we cannot forgive them.I think there should be a positive version of infractions(something like + & - rep) so if you help the site in some way(by uploading a great resource or something), you get an infraction removed. That would inspire people who really want to be here to actually fix their behavior.