But he is all-powerful, no? In which case he did, since he caused everything.
Read the OT.
It is obviously your dad's fault that you cut a random man in half and raped his face when you are 21 years old just because you simply got mad at the guy when he looked at you funny, even after you were raised in a perfectly normal childhood.
Because the people are still there.
Free will. And they die, go figure.
The details do. Do you want that link?
Right, because whether or not the colour of a beetle was orange or red matters so much when the point is that it is a beetle. And I've already seen the link.
No, it hasn't, and no, you don't.
Do atheists believe in spirits?
I'm acting as if your metaphors definitely don't work and you are most likely wrong.
Backbone.
That has nothing to do with confirmation bias. It is also a horribly biased metaphor; you assume you already know the answer.
It would be like seeing something you have never seen before and then guessing at how to react.
Your opinion on the metaphor: backbone.
It is more like guessing at how to react with a person that I've been a penpal with.
Last time I checked, the universe is not a rubber band.
Same principles apply.
A patch which no one knows how to download because they have a bunch of nutjobs ranting contradictory stories at them and are brainwashed at birth.
I just love it how I'm always wrong about faiths, and you are always right, l.o.l sarcasm.
On a different point, people do know how to download the thing. It isn't like God is making you jump through hoops, just say a simple repentant prayer, and accept Christ, Basic Christianity.
And you haven't actually done the calculations, just put your finger on a random field out of tens of thousands of choices and assumed it looked cool so it must be right.
Wrong.
yes.
If I need to make myself into an ignorant fool to see god, then I'll gladly decline your offer.
Now that is just downright pissy, stereotypical, and rude of you to say. You are completely wrong.
He makes you evil so you deserve the punishment?
He doesn't make you evil, you choose to be evil by your own decisions.
Read Paradise Lost, I'm sure you'll like it.
Is not a theological work, neither is Dante's work.
Sometimes less is more. No need to make a wall of text as a rebuttal.
It is easy to be spineless if you don't have any vertebrae to back up your limp comeback.
Oh, and El, if you don't understand why that metaphor fails, it's because well-coded stuff does not spawn bugs. Therefore, either god is incompetent or evil. Take your pick.
It was an illustration...not a technical manual on C++.
The old argument goes:
“Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able?
Then he is not omnipotent.
Free will, he has a plan.
Is he able, but not willing?
Then he is malevolent.
He has a plan, and is acting. He has also enacted the main phase, and beaten evil for those who want to be good.
Is he both able and willing?
Then whence cometh evil?
Our own hands produce evil.
Is he neither able nor willing?
Then why call him God?”
Because he is willing, able, has acted, is still acting, and is God.
And if you are responsible for creating everything and omit light in half the places, you are responsible for the fact that it's dark.
God created everything as 'good'. It fell because something that was once good, abused his free will, and perverted the world of 'good'.
The house was filled with 'light', and in some rooms the lights were turned off. God is going about and turning them back on.
You assume that God is just sitting on his righteous butt twiddling his thumbs as people do evil, and all just because you don't see some miraculous ball of fire come down and strike your childhood bully when he picks on you, or some bolt of lightning kill a rapist in the act.
He is working in the world, he has a plan, he is acting, he is going to punish unrepentant persons, and he is willing, and able, and is stopping evil, in perfect balance with the gift of free will to chose him or yourself.