- Joined
- Jul 10, 2007
- Messages
- 6,306
Ok, what about my Path resource? That was almost approved until I said not to approve it. The algorithm it used was breadth first search. Moderators didn't recognize the algorithm. I essentially have the power to decide whether my resource gets approved or graveyarded and how long my resource will sit in submissions ; |. Do you think that's right? Shouldn't it be up to the moderator solely?
Also, the weakness in my Scrambler algorithm was not recognized until much later by me. It was approved with its fatal weakness.
Then again, we can also look at examples of Bribe's work. He rewrote the Ascii lib on his own to actually be worse and approved his own update, even after being told that his update was actually worse. He has yet to change it and it appears that he never will. I even submitted an improved version of the original that ofc outperforms the one Bribe wrote. He has yet to put that one up.
There are many problems in the current system. It is no wonder that people on other sites think that the JASS portion of the site is now run by me and that Bribe is my puppet, lol (a discussion started at thehelper.net by someone)... when azlier was in charge of submissions, I essentially told him what to approve and not approve in the background (azlier was too lazy to do the reviews back then, so everything sat there unless I took the initiative). Me and Bribe argue all the time about resources, and the most apparent proofs of these arguments lie in the AddComma resource on the snippets thread and in the Ascii resource.
We must look at the facts... I know more about coding than any of the current moderators, which ends up screwing the current system over. The only way to fix that issue is to get a moderator up that's at least as good a coder as I am : \.
On TH, jesus4lyf was able to understand my algorithm wholly for T32 Safe, which was really awesome. He was like the only guy out of THW and TH that could understand the algorithm ; ). He actually regarded the algorithm as brilliant, but said that there would never be a case when T32 Safe wouldn't crash in a case where T32 would where the game wouldn't start to lag. I agreed with him ; p.
Also, the weakness in my Scrambler algorithm was not recognized until much later by me. It was approved with its fatal weakness.
Then again, we can also look at examples of Bribe's work. He rewrote the Ascii lib on his own to actually be worse and approved his own update, even after being told that his update was actually worse. He has yet to change it and it appears that he never will. I even submitted an improved version of the original that ofc outperforms the one Bribe wrote. He has yet to put that one up.
There are many problems in the current system. It is no wonder that people on other sites think that the JASS portion of the site is now run by me and that Bribe is my puppet, lol (a discussion started at thehelper.net by someone)... when azlier was in charge of submissions, I essentially told him what to approve and not approve in the background (azlier was too lazy to do the reviews back then, so everything sat there unless I took the initiative). Me and Bribe argue all the time about resources, and the most apparent proofs of these arguments lie in the AddComma resource on the snippets thread and in the Ascii resource.
We must look at the facts... I know more about coding than any of the current moderators, which ends up screwing the current system over. The only way to fix that issue is to get a moderator up that's at least as good a coder as I am : \.
On TH, jesus4lyf was able to understand my algorithm wholly for T32 Safe, which was really awesome. He was like the only guy out of THW and TH that could understand the algorithm ; ). He actually regarded the algorithm as brilliant, but said that there would never be a case when T32 Safe wouldn't crash in a case where T32 would where the game wouldn't start to lag. I agreed with him ; p.