Few to no one does studies on this because it's not worth it as many effects of the substance(s) are known not to be worth the trials.
Right, it's not worth it because ivermectin is cheap so big pharma can't make huge profits, instead pfizer would rather invent a new medicine.
Did Dr. Robert Malone correctly claim in a speech that COVID-19 vaccines are not working, that they cause infertility and...
leadstories.com
Claim: "COVID-19 vaccines are not working"
The article tries to counter this claim by stating "The vaccines have prevented serious illness and death for millions". Where's the evidence for this? Oh right, it's the "COVID-19 death rate" graph. I have mentioned in earlier posts that this type of graph is misleading, but let me repeat it here: 1) the graph is for all ages so it does not accurately show the risk of your own age group, 2) usually in these type of graphs if you have had your last vaccine less than 2 weeks ago you still count as 'unvaccinated', though here it appears these cases are simply excluded (I wonder why they couldn't at least show a separate line for this hmmmm), and 3) this graph does not show deaths caused BY vaccines, to make a fair comparison you need an ALL-CAUSE death rate graph.
Claim: "COVID-19 vaccines cause infertility"
The counterclaim for this ultimately leads to
SARS-CoV-2 spike protein seropositivity from vaccination or infection does not cause sterility - PubMed
I think it's important to consider that there are multiple ways to interpret infertility, the publication talks about sterility, but when I see talk about infertility in relation to the vaccines it usually seems to be about disrupted menstruation cycles or miscarriages:
Explosive Rise in Ontario Stillbirths Triggers Parliamentary Questions, Denials From Government
Claim: "vaccine makers are protected legally while families are not"
I don't really see a counter argument for this apart from the "lol actually you CAN sue them IF you can prove the damage was caused by the vaccine AND the vaccine manufacturer has engaged in WILLFUL misconduct" yeah... good luck proving that. Have you seen any stories about families being compensated? Me neither.
The Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine was fully approved by the Food and Drug Administration, though an emergency use authorization also remains in place. Dr. Robert Malone misleadingly said Americans are being offered the shot only under the latter and that it carried different liability...
www.factcheck.org
Not checking this site since I get insecure connection warning but from the url I assume it's the same claim as the last one from the previous link, which I already addressed.
A video viewed hundreds of thousands of times online features researcher Robert Malone making a series of claims about mRNA Covid-19 shots causing harm to children. But experts say the claims are inaccurate, and a physician from a leading children's hospital called the video "dangerously and...
factcheck.afp.com
Claim: "Spike proteins from mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are toxic"
Again, "there's no evidence", imagine arguing with a religious person that god doesn't exist and this is the only argument you can come up with.
It's funny, they also keep saying the claims they're trying to counter are misleading, but the only argument they seem to have that the spike proteins are safe is that supposedly the vaccines itself are not harmful, a conclusion they probably made based on the misleading COVID-19 death rates.
Claim: "Spike proteins often cause permanent damage in children's critical organs"
All I see here is nitpicking that it's "temporary" instead of permanent (do we have long-term studies to really know this for sure though?), and that the "rare" (which is also less rare than they want to admit, see one of my earlier posts for this) side effects may be caused by the immune response instead of the spike proteins itself.
Claim: "There is no benefit to vaccinating children against COVID-19"
"The vaccine is safe and effective (for children)" I'm so tired of reading this propaganda over and over, where is the proof to support this, I certainly don't see it in this article. Yes they mention children get hospitalized and maybe even die, but could the vaccine really have prevented that (is it effective?) and are the side effect risks (is it safe?) outweighted by the benefits?
'Misleading and frankly dangerous'
Hypocrisy, I already pointed out how these 'fact-checkers' are the misleading ones, and the real dangerous thing is how claims like Malone's are reacted to, there's no place anymore for a different point of view or a discussion.
www.reuters.com
The narrative of the covid fraud here fell long ago, in 2020.
