If you are working only with your website, the do not post it here, it's pure disrespection of players. If your map isn't realistic then i'm not your fan at all, then you can simply forget my words.
P.S. WC3 have a lot of arcade modern survival maps (even with quests), so why your map is better? If you cannot prove it, then you will be eaten by other mapmakers, do not be so pathetic about users.
P.P.S. Sorry for being rude in first comment, but i'm realy disappointed with map, because it CAN be the best map, but you need to work a little bit harder. Understand me? A LITTLE bit...
Okay. First thing, please check out
this tutorial.
Now, on to the content of your post.
Please note, I read both of your posts and intend to refer to them both, however I will only provide direct quotes from the second.
If you are working only with your website, the do not post it here, it's pure disrespection of players.
What?
1.) He's working on both his map and his website, and he seems to magically manage them both pretty flawlessly.
2.) He may post it here. It directly relates to his map, and when he provided the link, it was to help you understand.
3.) He showed no disrespect towards players in anyway. At all. I'm actually quite sure he respects anybody that plays his map. I would.
If your map isn't realistic then i'm not your fan at all, then you can simply forget my words.
1.) If you only like realism in a map that's fine by us. Just remember, you're playing a fantasy game, so you can't expect all too much realism. But yes, I see what you mean.
2.) I don't see why he would just forget your words because you're not a fan of his map now. All you've done is said how bad you think his map is. So you not becoming a fan suddenly reverses your opinion that his map sucks? :?
WC3 have a lot of arcade modern survival maps (even with quests), so why your map is better? If you cannot prove it, then you will be eaten by other mapmakers, do not be so pathetic about users.
Hm...
1.) Indeed WC3 does have a lot of maps of this
type. Each one being different than the next. Whether for better or for worse. He could provide reasons why his is better, but in the end people will disagree or agree based on what they think. Not what jk2pach thinks. So, just play this map, play others, and decide for yourself
why it is better. Okay?
2.) Only rude mapmakers would "eat him alive". Actually this map is quite superb, and any mapmaker would agree that it is definitely
not "a piece of crap". So, not only would they have no reason to eat him alive, but nobody is that rude. Well, so we hope.
3.) How is he being so "pathetic about users"? Do you know the
definition of pathetic? It doesn't appear you do. This statement makes no sense, and is therefore invalid.
Sorry for being rude in first comment
This statement kept you from a -1 rep. Thank you for realizing how you may have stated things meanly. Please, in the future, be nicer. this is your official warning. There are nicer ways to say things than you think. Take this post for an example, I could have just said "You're wrong. You're opinion is stupid, and everybody disagrees with you. Go learn proper English." That'd be absolutely mean, and inappropriate. It would also be unhelpful, and I hope that this post is anything but that.
i'm realy disappointed with map, because it CAN be the best map, but you need to work a little bit harder. Understand me? A LITTLE bit...
1.) I don't think there is any definable "best" map. I mean, everybody has their own personal likes and dislikes, so not every single person in the world would be able to agree on a definable "best" map.
2.) You called this map a "piece of crap", you said you were "no longer a fan of it" and you implied that you can't even figure out why this map is so much better than others of it's type. So how could it be the "best" map with a "little" work? How? Do you consider the current "best" map a piece of crap too? Or do you just like to speak nonsense?
If you take nothing else from this post, be nicer to users. There's always a better way to say things.