🏆 Texturing Contest #33 is OPEN! Contestants must re-texture a SD unit model found in-game (Warcraft 3 Classic), recreating the unit into a peaceful NPC version. 🔗Click here to enter!
It's time for the first HD Modeling Contest of 2024. Join the theme discussion for Hive's HD Modeling Contest #6! Click here to post your idea!
My thought is that everything would be handled in a way similar to our healthcare here in Canada. Sure, it's free, and everyone has access to it, but if you want more, or better treatment, you pay, and that's optional.
There will come a time where currency is either secondary, or done away with, and I feel that if it's kept around, it'd be used for other sorts of goods and services, like working as a bartender to earn credit towards more of something.
Aside from that, I would hope that the same future has finally done away with, or severely restricted religion to what it should have been, that being personal belief.
Everybody gets along and decided science and literature is way more better than blood money and shit. And then we all sail across the galaxy with robots and ships. Yeah I guess this definitely won't happen. Well at least its how I imagine my ideal world.
So yeah, my ideal future is where everyone can live a decent life where robots and computers replace the need for doing boring jobs allowing people to experience the world around them.
My thought is that everything would be handled in a way similar to our healthcare here in Canada......
Aside from that, I would hope that the same future has finally done away with, or severely restricted religion to what it should have been, that being personal belief.
Best post in this thread so far, I especially like the last part. +rep
Though I am afraid that restricting religion will not be enough, it will have to stamped out of existence. Unless we risk its cancer spreading into society again.
Everybody gets along and decided science and literature is way more better than blood money and shit. And then we all sail across the galaxy with robots and ships. Yeah I guess this definitely won't happen. Well at least its how I imagine my ideal world.
Have hope, science will eventually prevail over spirituality and myth though "blood money and shit" will always be there. I mean to say, we are a predatory species and it won't be so easy to escape our evolutionary past.
So yeah, my ideal future is where everyone can live a decent life where robots and computers replace the need for doing boring jobs allowing people to experience the world around them.
This.But I'm not just going to quote someone and say "this"I just agree with Shar
Ideal world=A world where there is peace and care between people regardless of race,gender,status or origin.Also,people should respect each other and think further than their own heart
A higher standard of tolerance, in all regards, is the only thing I want of my "ideal world."
With it, I'm pretty sure we can completely omit war from being a natural part of our
world, I think people can live more harmoniously together, no matter their differences,
I think we can fight poverty better and I think we can build better societies based on it.
It wouldn't be a perfect world, but it would be a better one.
So yeah, my ideal future is where everyone can live a decent life where robots and computers replace the need for doing boring jobs allowing people to experience the world around them.
A higher standard of tolerance, in all regards, is the only thing I want of my "ideal world."
....With it, I'm pretty sure we can completely omit war from being a natural part of our world.......
Respectable and admirable thoughts
My question here is: How far does your egalitarianism extend?
Would you let Neo-Nazis, Hooligans, ISIS, Taliban and the KKK to exist and preach their ideologies in your ideal world because you believe in tolerance, or would you prefer them exterminated?
If you will choose the later then war will be inevitable.
I'm not exactly an optimist. Ours, on a global scale, is a society in its infancy.
Without a parent to guide us, we've learned to walk and talk all on our own. I believe that it's time we finally started to mature, as we should have done over the last few centuries.
It's got nothing to do with any scenario (No idea what exactly you're talking about) or uncertainty, It's realism. Humanity has proven again and again that it sucks at becoming bester. I see it developing in a way that will humans make destroy themselves.
It's got nothing to do with any scenario (No idea what exactly you're talking about) or uncertainty, It's realism. Humanity has proven again and again that it sucks at becoming bester. I see it developing in a way that will humans make destroy themselves.
Agreed.
EDIT:If the world could have a better system,maybe it will not be like this.
EDIT2:I don't think i will be alive when humans destroy themselves,so i give shit.
Would you let Neo-Nazis, Hooligans, ISIS, Taliban and the KKK to exist and preach their ideologies in your ideal world because you believe in tolerance, or would you prefer them exterminated?
While I don't endorse the the ultimatum of your questions, with only opposite
extremes as the only two viable options, I'm going to approach it like how I think
you meant it.
In a world with a higher standard of tolerance, I'd say these organizations would either
have seized to exist or would have changed so dramatically that I do think I would
accept their existence. But as a rule of thumb: Being tolerant doesn't mean you have to
tolerate intolerance. Also, please don't identify me with any "ism's" without me having
clearly stated so myself first.
I am not an egalitarian, nor am I not it, I am a human being.
It's realism. Humanity has proven again and again that it sucks at becoming bester. I see it developing in a way that will humans make destroy themselves.
Its not so. There are also good people out there, you should count their efforts also. You are talking as if you have lived since centuries, don't judge the whole of humanity so hastily. You should give issues like these more thought before you reach any concrete conclusions. Have some optimism.
Also consider what Direfury, LordDz and Keiji and others posted.
And also, I would like to know the reasons why you have reached this conclusion.
Today we are able enjoy our democratic rights and freedoms, because of all the brave people, who lived before us and who dared to give a shit. It is not about us, it is about the future generations. Think about it.
In a world with a higher standard of tolerance, I'd say these organizations would either have seized to exist or would have changed so dramatically that I do think I would accept their existence.
Thats a very important point. Higher level of education among the masses (specifically in the third world), equal access to resources (energy, food, jobs etc.) and a lower level of population will (should) increase tolerance.
Now the question arises that how do we intended to achieve all this? What are the means that we possess now and what are the techniques or systems that we will need to develop in order to make this ideal world a subtle possibility? This question was also part of the premise of the thread.
Thoughts.
Just what I was intending you to say. Considering that it has been stated by the admin now, it should be taken as an unwritten thumb rule on this site to bash intolerant behavior.
I was cross questioning to get more juice out of you, as I know your knowledge and ability to put words forward in a reasonable and sensible manner and it would have helped the agenda of this thread. So...ultimatum, nah
I must say,this annoys me and I'm a teenager.However,I don't like talking face to face with people.Whenever I do I feel uncomfortable or mix up words.I'm not a social person,except over the internet or whatsapp etc
I think my ideal world would be the one of the 20th century, where there was technology but it didn't overwhelm us so much as it does nowadays. A world where people used to meet each other face to face and hang out rather than sitting hours in front of a computer screen.
You are talking as if you have lived since centuries, don't judge the whole of humanity so hastily. You should give issues like these more thought before you reach any concrete conclusions. Have some optimism.
I won't stop anyone from trying to make the world a better place - I just stopped believing that to be possible.
I used to try and make the world a better place by being a good person - and failed terribly.
I don't really feel like sharing any private details about that, let's just say that I have etablished a really good life by now and I won't risk anything anymore. I don't believe anymore that humanity is worth such a thing.
Let the world and humanity either kill or heal itself, seriously, I don't give a damn about that. I live in the here and now, I enjoy my life.
I don't wish anyone to lose hope, but I'm quite sure that, at some point, everyone reaches a point where he either stops caring or becomes an emotionally broken wreckage.
Well, that is possible. You can go live on an island or any remote part of the world that no political power cares about. You will find your peace there but no internet and hiveworkshop
or you can develop a spaceship and leave for another world altogether hmmm
An overall better world does affect our daily lives. See, if there was no war in Syria, there would be no refugees and if there were no refugees there would not have been any protests by hooligans; no protests means that public transport would have been on time. Which means people would have reached their workplace on time and would not have been reprimanded by their bosses for getting late. Which directly affects their mood and makes them more irksome and hence diminishes their quality of life and makes them say hateful things about themselves. An egoist should worry about his quality of life, shouldn't he?
I don't wish anyone to lose hope, but I'm quite sure that, at some point, everyone reaches a point where he either stops caring or becomes an emotionally broken wreckage.
All of us have different thresholds, hopefully I will last longer, I will try to.
And you were totally on-topic, very honest and straightforward
Thats a rare and good quality right there, honesty; and for that you deserve a +rep
in 20 years scientist predict that the world's food and water needs will go up by 70%. they also predict a raise in temperature of 3 degrees celcius killing ocean life because of the ocean acidification due to constant evaporation and increased humidity which will cause crops and rain forest to suffer. which means it's likely our world is more likely to get worse rather then better.
my ideal world is one where taxes are low and the basic needs for survival are abundantly available for all. this and not living on a planet that's on fire. I would also like my first request, that governments and presidence both fear and serve us, that when caught doing something illegal they are judged and punished by the public
not like the current UN system where all the countries in the world agree not to do something, but then the super countries which are part of the G5, break the agreement and get away without even a slap on the wrist. yet!!! If your part of the smaller countries, you get fined or put in jail for war crimes.
you want a recent example of this? the UN agreed no boots on the ground in Afghanistan, meaning no combat units ie army units. America broke that rule just recently but denies it, even though they caught them on camera both in the air (jets) and on the ground (combat units)
my ideal world is one where taxes are low and the basic needs for survival are abundantly available for all. this and not living on a planet that's on fire.
The earth with a high survival rate (aka free healthcare everywhere, good living conditions, no war etc) would make the world over populated in no time.
It is not your reason but your innocence that speaks.
So you will get rid of Dr. Stephen Hawkings? Do you know Beethoven was deaf? Do you know Stevie Wonder is blind? Do you know most important authors, philosophers we study today have gone through severe mental depression? No woman or man is perfect, we all have our disabilities. What makes us fit to procreate?
The greatness of humanity lays not so much in being able to remake the world - as in being able to remake ourselves. Think about it.
I imagine my ideal world as Chaplin did in this video:
Which is why I want people to respect each other and think further than their own heart in my ideal world.Why should one judge and abuse another because of their flaws,knowing you have a lot of flaws yourself
Which is why I want people to respect each other and think further than their own heart in my ideal world.Why should one judge and abuse another because of their flaws,knowing you have a lot of flaws yourself
You know... if someone is just kidding with somebody, only few people can believe that!
At the other hand, when someone accuse a person, everybody start to believe that!... and that's the problem!
It is not your reason but your innocence that speaks.
So you will get rid of Dr. Stephen Hawkings? Do you know Beethoven was deaf? Do you know Stevie Wonder is blind? Do you know most important authors, philosophers we study today have gone through severe mental depression? No woman or man is perfect, we all have our disabilities. What makes us fit to procreate
1. It's ENsure. Please improve your english, reading your posts is already a pain WITHOUT the grammar issues. It makes it even worse.
2. Let me get this straight: You think that every person suffering from any mental or physical illness shouldn't be allowed to procreate? Yeah, that's extremely tolerant, you should be getting international graditude for that.
3. You know, I've been reading some of your posts (because you spam the whole OT section with your crap) and I highly doubt that YOU would be one of the "smartest", therefore you shouldn't allow yourself to procreate, since, in your opinion, only the smartest and fittest should procreate.
4. Hey, psst, I got a secret for you: Being poor has nothing to do with being smart or fit.
Seriously what the hell is wrong with you? Every single time I read one of your posts, I can hear my brain cells crying "Please stop reading that or we will kill ourselves!".
Just what the hell went wrong that led to so many idiots showing up...
Mentally sick people should not procreate, no.
Physical sickness is not transferred through genes so that's fine. (I can be wrong)
I highly doubt that YOU would be one of the "smartest", therefore you shouldn't allow yourself to procreate, since, in your opinion, only the smartest and fittest should procreate.
He kind of bring up a (somewhat) valid point.
But..
There will always be someone who is "weakest" (mentally or/and physically), so it will continue on and on until there's only one person left.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Jk.
