And world of warcraft is just like diablo2.
I would like to echo this.
You are missing my point sc2 is same as sc1 are practically the same, except graphics (NOT INCLUDING GAME PLAY) tell me whats different. just seem they care about $$$ and more people get excited about it the more it will sell, probably reason they waiting on it. and as far as wc3 and sc they are practically the same i mean i could make a sc game out of using wc editor and except adding a model i could use wc3 editor alone. if not for the editor the game would suck.
You must remeber that they are a developer; OF COURSE THEY WANT MONEY! They would loose their jobs if they went "let's make this game for freeeee". That may not be a bad thing though; to make the most money, you need to make the best product/video game out there.
It is not nearly the same as WC3 truthfully; in every respect, the engine is different. The models and terrain are extremely detailed. They have worked for years on this project; most developers take a year, maybe two, max of three to make a video game.
How will it suck? Please tell me. The multiplayer and singleplayer gameplay will be kick ass and awesome to play; the campaign will take WoW's superb storytelling and insert that into Starcraft's wicked story; and a wicked editor to boot! I also doubt you could make everything that is awesome about Starcraft 2 in Warcraft 3's engine.
All in all, there isn't anything else to argue about really. The "They are in it for the money" dealeo is true, as with
every single developer out there, but remember that they want this game to last; why else would they take years? They cared enough about the model detail that they had their modelers re-do all the Zerg (and some terran) models, for cripes sake! ANY other developer would of gone "good enough, move on.".
In closing (D: raaant

), I would like to echo this person.
Seeing how you compare two games "not including gameplay", you suck.
I sure hope I'm not being trolled. D: I am face-desking right now.