- Joined
- Nov 26, 2006
- Messages
- 11,136
If you wanted to split your posts up more visually you could always use [hr]
tags.
tags.
Well, if you want to put things on the same scale (even tough I don't know how accurate the test is, and it's merely orientative), here is a link to a test a mensa guy from denmark has made (or at least, it says that). The test consists of 39 items you have to reply in up to 40 minutes (everything is expained on the page).
Thank's for the tip, I will keep it in mind for the next time.If you wanted to split your posts up more visually you could always use [hr]
tags.
Genius here.
And that's an interfact.
You may have the IQ of a genius (which I highly doubt) but you are not a genius.
Just because you have an IQ over 140 does not make you a genius, your intelligence never changes (unless you drink your way through life or something) but you could be the least intelligent person in the world and know everything, your IQ or intelligence does not determine how knowledgeable you are.
Flamesoul, ' is not used for plural and it's not gramatically correct to have "and" at the begenning of your sentance.
Flamesoul, ' is not used for plural and it's not gramatically correct to have "and" at the begenning of your sentance.
You may have the IQ of a genius (which I highly doubt) but you are not a genius.
Just because you have an IQ over 140 does not make you a genius, your intelligence never changes (unless you drink your way through life or something) but you could be the least intelligent person in the world and know everything, your IQ or intelligence does not determine how knowledgeable you are.
Flamesoul, ' is not used for plural and it's not gramatically correct to have "and" at the begenning of your sentance.
Indeed, I just noticed that I only had four. >.>Bantas, that's five lines.
Print Screen and Paste on a program like Photoshop.
Look at the score,
Press Print Screen,
Open Photoshop,
Create New (for me it sets height and width to the Print screen size automatically),
Press Ctrl+V
Save as .png or .jpg
Post here and add the image as an attachment.
That's what I know.![]()
That's what i did but it didn't work ^^ Nevermind...
The last ones were weird. Used about 5-8 min on the 30 first questions and then I went "wtf?". Can't remember what I got and how much time I had left. It was something around 120. I did get 141 on another test though, but shiiK got 142 on it (damn you shiiK)![]()
yeah those last ones are really wtf >___>
This is why you have 105
Can't remember. It was almost one year agoWhich one was the other test?![]()
Here are some definitions:Checked that IQ test. I fail to believe that your intelligence can be determined purely by your ability to see logical patterns like that - with a computer observing.
I don't agree with that. I don't think Albert Einstein was a really good composer and he was a real genius when it came to logic thinking, he could see patterns, find relationships no one could, and as a result, he set bases for quantum physics (and the atomic bomb, even though he didn't intend that). On the other hand, I don't think Ludwig van Beethoven was really awesome at logical thinking, but he was a real genius when it came to writing music (and he was deaf). So, while you may set a scale for people's inteligence based on all of their skills (I think today they talk about multiple inteligence), a genius not necesarily is good at most things (maybe DaVinci would be one of this), but a genius is someone who is REALLY outstanding in at least one field.if you're a genius then you're good at most things, clearly there's a difference. I'd guess that you could determine a person's intelligence going by average skill. <.<
Then don't bother to post (just a suggestion).I can't care less