deepstrasz
Map Reviewer
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2009
- Messages
- 20,213
If this has the Oil bug(s) like the Human Campaign, then sorry 
(16 ratings)
Gameplay |
Screenshots |
Credits |
Changelog |
Hasn't been created since this one also isn't finishedwhere is beyond the portal expansion?![]()
now i seeHasn't been created since this one also isn't finished
On both Orc & Human campaigns, when trying to repair ships I get a "Unable to target Ships" message.
Player(PLAYER_NEUTRAL_AGGRESSIVE)
instead?Sometimes when you see them, yes. Not sure when their visibility is switched, but it's very brief.Runes show up on the minimap?
Sometimes when you see them, yes. Not sure when their visibility is switched, but it's very brief.
I think the idea of such a remake is for Warcraft II fans to enjoy it foremost.I'm sorry if this is too much to ask, but I think this will make this great mod much more popular.
Hello, I loved this campaign incredibly. I had never played Warcraft 2 before but I came here just to explore lore.
But the lore seems non-canon and confusing. I read up that many aspects were retconned later. I'm just wondering would it be possible to make a lore canon version of Warcraft 2 in WarCraft3 with creative filling in by the maker to smooth over the retcons for a person trying this for the Lore?
I'm sorry if this is too much to ask, but I think this will make this great mod much more popular.
A retconned campaign could be interesting, however that would require many new maps, units, sounds, models..etc. and really knowing the new lore (until changedHello, I loved this campaign incredibly. I had never played Warcraft 2 before but I came here just to explore lore.
But the lore seems non-canon and confusing. I read up that many aspects were retconned later. I'm just wondering would it be possible to make a lore canon version of Warcraft 2 in WarCraft3 with creative filling in by the maker to smooth over the retcons for a person trying this for the Lore?
I'm sorry if this is too much to ask, but I think this will make this great mod much more popular.
A retconned campaign could be interesting, however that would require many new maps, units, sounds, models..etc. and really knowing the new lore (until changed) to be a good remake.
Eyy man, if that's his wish, it's not your insistence to influence his decision, no matter if you like it or not.Please Helldoom, I beg you, no! Just NO!
Eyy man, if that's his wish, it's not your insistence to influence his decision, no matter if you like it or not.
Retconning the ORIGINAL Warcraft lore is just damn disrespectful to Warcraft itself and surely ruined the story. This campaign is a remake of the ORIGINAL LORE of the ORIGINAL GAME CAMPAIGNS of Warcraft II that is loved by the TRUE Warcraft FANS, not the WoW fans.
THIS IS the original and THIS IS CANON, not the WoW retcons.
I dont mean to disrespect you but if you prefer shit retcon lore then you might as well go to WoW and its ridiculous lore and dumb plot. If you want a retcon Warcraft 2 story, you can go read the novels written by Rosenberg and Golden. Those novels are under the WoW banner, and it retconned (RUINED) the original Warcraft 2 campaign lore and plot.
Can you link me to those campaigns? I'll be much obliged.I think the idea of such a remake is for Warcraft II fans to enjoy it foremost.
There are other Warcraft II and Orcs & Humans campaigns out here inclined towards what you want.
That is a pretty dumb thing to say tbh, in my opinion a dumb plotline is one where confusing alternate endings ruin continuity aspects. I have never cared about WoW (never even played the original WoW classic) and my only interest is in the Warcraft 3 characters. In warcraft 2 the story follows 2 alternate endings that doesnt follow through a single storyline from the beginning to the end of WC3.
Also Golden's novels were pretty incredible, Lord of the Clans and Rise of the Horde were some of the best novels I have ever read set on a game universe, it made for an almost literary experience.
I don't think retconning the story for a new campaign would ruin the original lore. It would be just a different version. If Helldoom were to make a campaign which takes after the updated story of Wc2 based on the novels, I would welcome them happily. People want to act like the story was sacred in the original games. They weren't. Narratives must stop being treated as gospel. This isn't a religion.
Not to mention it's just a fan version, and I would be interested to see one as well.
The novels ARE RETCON. The ORIGINAL WARCRAFT LORE will ALWAYS BE BETTER and SUPERIOR to WoW's retcon lore, and those novels were made for WoW players who know nothing about the TRUE EPIC ORIGINAL STORIES of the Warcrafts, for the sake of just catering to their taste in WoW.
Retcons means CHANGING the original stuff. It literally means RUINING the original stories.
It should NEVER BE the original stuff that should adjust for the new stuff.
This is the #1 reason why majority of people that know and played the original WC1-3, hate WoW... because of the retcons it did, not just to the Warcrafts, but even to its own older WoW stories.
Example of story retcons:
Orig WC1 story: Doomhammer kills Blackhand to become the new warchief
Retcon WC1 movie story: Lothar kills Blackhand in a one on one fight
HENCE, changing the original story context which is NEVER GOOD
If a new campaign is to be made that is totally different and separate to this one, its totally fine since it wont affect the perfect story remake of the original wc2 campaigns.
Thats not at all true, the original novels such as Lord of the Clans and early WoW all built up a more fleshed out and believable world. For example, the original WC1 story is so bland as to be non-existent from the world-building perspective. Also the majority of Warcraft fans I know love the early WoW upto WoTLK, especially because of the incredible novels that make the game-world so much more of a literary experience.
Also, Doomhammer killing Blackhand to become the Warchief IS the canon, referenced in most books and graphic novels as well. WC Movie is not canon and does not belong to the same timeline, its some retardation about time travel and other BS introduced after WoD. When they say Original WC lore, in my mind it includes WoW upto WoTLK days including all the great authors and well-built novels till then.
Games don't have that because they are visual, so logically you don't need more than say maps aside the chapters themselves. The map along with background lore is present in each of the game's manuals.Thats not at all true, the original novels such as Lord of the Clans and early WoW all built up a more fleshed out and believable world.
He wrote that it is the canon.And no, doomhammer killing blackhand is NOT a retcon... it is clearly mentioned in wc2 manual
He wrote that it is the canon.
You're right.He wrote in his very last follow up statement... A follow-up last sentence in his post.
You're right.
But he's right too, Orgrim, as Gul'dan were introduced in the Tides of Darkness manual which is pretty much a retcon but one more an addition than actual change.
0009:err:ole:CoCreateInstanceEx apartment not initialised