This is rather funny :)

[Mr.Goblin]

you mean Sorceress and ...? (archevist?)

 

[redmarine]

you mean Sorceress and ...? (archevist?)

I thought you guys were going to recreate all 3 but sure. An archivist model would be nice.

 

[dansaDisco]

you mean Sorceress and ...? (archevist?)

I believe he means sorcerer and Witch Doctor

 

[Mr.Goblin]

I believe he means sorcerer and Witch Doctor

I already said me and DonDustin are making a witch doctor model

and me and General frank are making a Barbarian model

so when he said, you could also create the left 2 classes, i didn't understand cause there's only one left (Sorceress)..

why i said (archevist?)

anyway

will see for the sorceress really.. like Much later, since the skin by Archian is already really good

 

[CloudMax]

An Archievist would be fun indeed, making fun of him, haha.
But well, it wont happen in this map, we have already talked a lot about it.

 

[Kwah]

Goblin is such fucking win. To put it simply.

<3

 

[Thyrael]

And it wont desturb you in battle becouse how often do you see someone changing gear during battle? Should that even be possible?

In my RPG I'm using a full screnn inventory too. and your hero won't be able to change his/her gear while in combat, cause it's simple unlogical to me. While in fight you'll be able to use potions and powerups from backpack, but can't drag and drop them into belt or other slots. These restrictions will make the player to take some seconds and check up stuff before entering a bossfight.

And I must say, the inventory looks nice. The idea with multiboard is a good one. In my map I'm using a background unit and the texttags for shoing the infos for buttons, spells and items. You can imagine the tooltips like in WoW. they are also semitransparent and not fixed to a single location. If you want to know how I did that, simple give me PM.

 

[CloudMax]

Anyway...
I think this is off-topic :O
Does the thread have anything at all to do with the inventory?..

 

[redmarine]

In my RPG I'm using a full screnn inventory too. and your hero won't be able to change his/her gear while in combat, cause it's simple unlogical to me. While in fight you'll be able to use potions and powerups from backpack, but can't drag and drop them into belt or other slots. These restrictions will make the player to take some seconds and check up stuff before entering a bossfight.

And I must say, the inventory looks nice. The idea with multiboard is a good one. In my map I'm using a background unit and the texttags for shoing the infos for buttons, spells and items. You can imagine the tooltips like in WoW. they are also semitransparent and not fixed to a single location. If you want to know how I did that, simple give me PM.

well, diablo franchaise allows for equipment swapping while in combat so we wont change that.

 

[dansaDisco]

well, diablo franchise allows for equipment swapping while in combat so we wont change that.

But diablo doesn't have a full screen inventory

 

[redmarine]

But diablo doesn't have a full screen inventory

Well, the heroes get paused while in combat to prevent ugly stuff from happening.

 

[Eleandor]

BTW, about the Floating interfaces.
Bahh They are not following the player, they are following an unit. And thats where the problem appears, our custom camera shows from another angel so we will have to do some INSANE math to base it on that system.
I tryed to solve the problem and failed, thats why im not working on the roll sytem, i came a bit, but then i came to think of the camera issue and had to stop becouse its based of this: http://www.wc3c.net/showthread.php?t=102351 :O

They are not following the unit. They follow the player's camera, which in the testmap happens to follow the unit, that's a whole different thing. So if you got some minor jass knowledge you should be able to make it follow your game camera.

It is however not MPI.

 

[CloudMax]

They are not following the unit. They follow the player's camera, which in the testmap happens to follow the unit, that's a whole different thing. So if you got some minor jass knowledge you should be able to make it follow your game camera.

It is however not MPI.

Then it is following the unit.... in the preview.
But i remember them saying that they could not make it follow the camera, perfectly if they doesnt use units stucked to it becouse in the version where it follows the camera, it kind of blinks after you.
And its not MPI.

 

[redmarine]

Then it is following the unit.... in the preview.
But i remember them saying that they could not make it follow the camera, perfectly if they doesnt use units stucked to it becouse in the version where it follows the camera, it kind of blinks after you.
And its not MPI.

The images are set according to the unit's location and how the camera is set.

 

[CloudMax]

The images are set according to the unit's location and how the camera is set.

Exactly, so it requires the unit. Without the unit it wouldnt move perfect, atleast the guy that made the system shown before hasnt made one that works without a unit without having the interface blinking after you.

 

[Thyrael]

It can be MPI, just give the buttons invisibility and the other player won't see them.

 

[CloudMax]

It can be MPI, just give the buttons invisibility and the other player won't see them.

But thats not the problem.
First we should decide if we want to use it at all, and we wont use it for a bar with spells, thats just useless and time consuming.
Then we should try to get the thing to work.
Then we should talk about making it MPI.

So we wont use this, no reason to talk about it and its totally off-topic, i said before that we should stop talking about this but no one ever listen. :S