Is there any way to do this? (Get Array Number)

[X-Death]

• Events
  • Unit - A unit Acquires an item
• Conditions
  • (Item-type of (Item being manipulated)) Equal to Change Job to Archer
• Actions
  • If (All Conditions are True) then do (Then Actions) else do (Else Actions)
    • If - Conditions
      • Or - Any (Conditions) are true
        • Conditions
          • (Triggering unit) Equal to Soldier[1]
          • (Triggering unit) Equal to Soldier[2]
          • (Triggering unit) Equal to Soldier[3]
    • Then - Actions
      • Unit - Remove (Triggering unit) from the game
      • Unit - Create 1 Archer for (Owner of (Triggering unit)) at (Position of (Triggering unit)) facing 270.00 degrees
      • Set Soldier[X] = (Last created unit)
    • Else - Actions

What I'm trying to do is set the Soldier[X] variable to the unit that changed their job. Wat do?

 

[PurgeandFire]

• Events
  • Unit - A unit Acquires an item
  • Conditions
    • (Item-type of (Item being manipulated)) Equal to Change Job to Archer
  • Actions
    • For each (Integer A) from 1 to 3 do (Actions)
      • Loop - Actions
        • If (All Conditions are True) then do (Then Actions) else do (Else Actions)
          • If - Conditions
            • (Triggering unit) Equal to Soldier[(Integer A)]
          • Then - Actions
            • Unit - Remove (Triggering unit) from the game
            • Unit - Create 1 Archer for (Owner of (Triggering unit)) at (Position of (Triggering unit)) facing 270.00 degrees
            • Set Soldier[(Integer A)] = (Last created unit)
            • Skip Remaining Actions
          • Else - Actions

The "Skip Remaining Actions" isn't necessary, but I put it there anyway. The trigger above is basically doing the same thing. "Or" conditions kind of behave like this:
If (condition A) -> do actions. else, check (condition B)
If (condition B) -> do actions. else, check (condition C)
If (condition C) -> do actions. else, check (condition D)....

So forth. In your case, you can model it with a loop since your conditions are all the same except for the index.

Also... make sure you switch (Integer A) with your own variable. Just in case. If you need an explanation just ask me in chat.

 

[X-Death]

Thank you. Got it now. +Rep

 

[IcemanBo]

You also could use hashtables.. could be useful if you often use loops to find the index.

Init

• Actions
  • Hashtabelle - Create a hashtable
  • Set Hashtable = (Last created hashtable)
  • For each (Integer A) from 1 to 3, do (Actions)
    • Schleifen - Aktionen
      • Hashtabelle - Save (Integer A) as Index of (Key (Owner of Footman[(Integer A)])) in Hashtable

Here you save the index of footman into your hashtable

Usage

• Events
  • Unit - A unit acquires an item
• Conditions
  • (Item-type of (Item being manipulated)) Equal to Change Job to Archer
  • Or - Any (Conditions) are true
    • Conditions
      • (Triggering unit) Equals Footman[1]
      • (Triggering unit) Equals Footman[2]
      • (Triggering unit) Equals Footman[3]
• Actions
  • Set Point = (Position of (Triggering unit))
  • Unit - Create 1 Archer for (Owner of (Triggering unit)) at Point facing 0.00 degrees
  • Set Footman[(Load Index of (Key (Owner of (Triggering unit))) from Hashtable)] = (Last created unit)
  • Unit - Remove (Triggering unit) from the game
  • Custom script: call RemoveLocation (udg_Point)
  • Custom script: set udg_Point = null

So you can just load the index out of the hashtable depending on which Footman enters

But if you only need it for this single trigger, it's maybe no worth to use hashtable for this.. I guess looping from 1-3 is then would be better here.

 

[Maker]

IcemanBo, you could avoid the or conditions with Hashtable - integer value exists or by loading the value and checking that it is not 0.

 

[IcemanBo]

@Maker But triggering unit will be removed them, or.. even it's not the Footman

Edit: Okay, I see now,
you can remove the Or Conditions, but after you load the index of hashtable you can put the further actions info an IFE block with condition index =! 0 , thx

Yes, like Maker said :d