Data | Data structure | Type of test | Power | Mean ± SEM | Number of cells | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

Effect of UCPH on AII EPSC amplitude | ||||||

Control | Normal distribution | −315.00 ± 22.05 | 8 | |||

50 μm UCPH | Normal distribution | −300.60 ± 21.52 | 8 | |||

a | Control vs UCPH | Paired Student’s t test | p = 0.1588 | 8 | ||

Effect of UCPH on AII EPSC time to peak (unit: ms) | ||||||

Control | Normal distribution | 14.08 ± 0.53 | 8 | |||

50 μm UCPH | Normal distribution | 13.69 ± 0.63 | 8 | |||

b | Control vs UCPH | Paired Student’s t test | p = 0.6306 | 8 | ||

Effect of UCPH on AII mEPSC frequency (unit: Hz) | ||||||

Control | Normal distribution | 6.95 ± 2.24 | 8 | |||

50 μm UCPH | Normal distribution | 7.22 ± 2.37 | 8 | |||

c | Control vs UCPH | Paired Student’s t test | p = 0.4685 | 8 | ||

DHK effect on AII mEPSC amplitude (unit: pA) | ||||||

Control | Normal distribution | −21.62 ± 0.78 | 8 | |||

50 μm UCPH | Normal distribution | −19.94 ± 0.82 | 8 | |||

d | Control vs UCPH | Paired Student’s t test | p = 0.0707 | 8 | ||

Effect of UCPH on AII mEPSC rise time (unit: ms) | ||||||

Control | Non-normal distribution | 0.32 ± 0.01 | 8 | |||

50 μm UCPH | Normal distribution | 0.32 ± 0.01 | 8 | |||

e | Control vs UCPH | Wilcoxon signed-rank test | p = 0.8125 | 8 | ||

Effect of UCPH on AII mEPSC tau (unit: ms) | ||||||

Control | Normal distribution | 0.75 ± 0.04 | 8 | |||

50 μm UCPH | Normal distribution | 0.76 ± 0.03 | 8 | |||

f | Control vs UCPH | Paired Student’s t test | p = 0.6382 | 8 |

UCPH101, a selective EAAT1/GLAST blocker; AII, AII amacrine cell.