In the far future hopefully terraforming technology (most likely a further evolution of Green technology) will have reached a high enough peak inorder to transform the moon into a livable world. Thats what I would hope atleast.
Mars is probably too far off for now, the moon will most likely be a first experiment in Terraforming due to its size and etc. But...then again, not much to work with considering the moon is a barren wasteland.
Meh...I'm just rambling.
In the far future hopefully terraforming technology (most likely a further evolution of Green technology) will have reached a high enough peak inorder to transform the moon into a livable world. Thats what I would hope atleast.
Mars is probably too far off for now, the moon will most likely be a first experiment in Terraforming due to its size and etc. But...then again, not much to work with considering the moon is a barren wasteland.
Meh...I'm just rambling.
That's what I'm hoping.
But then you gotta wonder... is that what we were really made for? To come in and change everything as we go, like some sort of virus?
That's what it reminds me of. We come in and set up shop. Who are we to drastically alter these planets?
But at the same time, it opens up all sorts of exciting ideas for the future. I'm not living in no space dome on a grey rock.
... you got it al wrong ...As an amateur astronomer, i can tell you this. Moon will never support life because of:
No core activity - it's just a rock, it is not heated from within tho it used to have a molten core long time ago
No mineral soil - we all know that soil and minerals it contains are the basis of life we know
No gravity - this screws up most - moon's gravity is too weak to contain atmospheric gasses
IMO fighting wars in space would be far better; at least we would not destroy our planet.
Apparently you've never seen Star Wars. Death Star anyone?
![]()
Terraforming is not so advanced and sf-ish, would just be expensive and would take ages to give results. Also, scientists only have plans on how to do it on mars.
p.s.
the fact that it is a joke allows him to say anything, fun killer!![]()
It's direct sunlight that owns the planet surface. The idea is to increase the overall planet temperature using greenhouse effect while reducing the surface exposure. That will reduce the day-night temperature difference and enable liquid water to stay on the surface. Increase in the overall temperature would eventually lead to ice cap melting and releasing water. There are a lot of other frozen compounds in the planet's ice caps so the scientists do not know how that would reflect on the atmosphere.
Someone ain't readingAnd the plan was to inhabit mars with primitive extremophyllic bacteria which would produce greenhouse gasses. Just adding ozone is like trying to drain the ocean using a spoon.
Among other things.But then you gotta wonder... is that what we were really made for?
And elephants.To come in and change everything as we go, like some sort of virus?
Who's to complain? (Besides us, but that's circular logic.)We come in and set up shop. Who are we to drastically alter these planets?
We do not terraform the moon (as you say later). What we do is import that stuff from Earth. Then we can set up bubbles containing those 3 things.As an amateur astronomer, i can tell you this. Moon will never support life because of:
No core activity - it's just a rock, it is not heated from within tho it used to have a molten core long time ago
No mineral soil - we all know that soil and minerals it contains are the basis of life we know
No gravity - this screws up most - moon's gravity is too weak to contain atmospheric gasses
They coexist. While our governments may be at war, scientists tend to get along pretty well about this.I don't think that we will get out of this rock too soon. We have huge load of [random censored word] in earth. This is an objective, which can only be achieved with international coorporation (i mean- no more wars and stuff). Unstable politics would make colonization pretty hard.
War does not run economy. It is very profitable, but it is not by any means the reason economy exists.Wars run economy, as long as there is money, there will be wars.
War is not the reason for destroying our planet. We do that other ways.So i think we'll just have to take our petty conflicts across the solar system. IMO fighting wars in space would be far better; at least we would not destroy our planet.
Scientists won't defend stuff against sabotage etc. Let's say America wants to colonize some random planet. The chance that terrorists would sabotage the whole effort is quite big. Isn't it ?They coexist. While our governments may be at war, scientists tend to get along pretty well about this.
One thing you may not realize about Mars is that it has no molten core. This means it has no magnetosphere. This is why it has a much thinner atmosphere. The solar wind from the sun blew it away. If we want a better atmosphere on Mars, we still need bubbles like we would on the moon.
Obviously, magma flow has been stopped and the main magnetic field no longer exists, but the former tectonic plates still act like giant magnets themselves. Who knows, maybe their magnetic fields will be enough for small colonies in the future.Current models of the planet's interior imply a core region about 1,480 kilometres in radius, consisting primarily of iron with about 14–17% sulfur. This iron sulfide core is partially fluid, and has twice the concentration of the lighter elements than exist at Earth's core. The core is surrounded by a silicate mantle that formed many of the tectonic and volcanic features on the planet, but now appears to be inactive.