- Joined
- Jul 8, 2005
- Messages
- 198
No people play Wc3 anymore. They all play DotA.
I can't see how SC2's storyline is going to be much better
Of course they play Melee. But on B.net, not single player.
Warcraft 3 because its free
I am going into dangerous territory. I have been yearning to play WoW again but once I start... well it would once again consume my time like a black hole. Not to mention the money.
Also, I DO NOT at all believe ANYONE here on the Hive has ever beat a melee game on "insane" difficulty.
Ehh? I can beat easily 8 computers with insane difficulty easily. What's hard with it? X_xAsh said:Also, I DO NOT at all believe ANYONE here on the Hive has ever beat a melee game on "insane" difficulty.
Yeah, okay, Dr00d.Dr00d said:Or, use your head and see that you're really just going along with the crowd because hating WoW is popular. It's still in the top 10 selling PC games after how many years of being out?
It isn't. How ever, when it's kill (at the MOST) 20 of the same monsters to better your character, it is fun. Most of the time, progressing an avatar through any kind of challenge is fun in on ea or another, and we call them video games. Personally, I don't like hearing "Jobs done!" every time a tower is done being built. Repatriation is in 90% of games, wc3 included. Tell me when killing 37576524379523864597843 ghouls to win a match is fun. Or, use your head and see that you're really just going along with the crowd because hating WoW is popular. It's still in the top 10 selling PC games after how many years of being out?
MySpaceBarBroke said:Yeah, okay, Dr00d.
~Void~ said:Because when you kill units in WC3, theres variation. When you kill units in MMORPGs it's the same thing, over and over D:
*Popular on this site.
Oh yeah there's only one monster in WoW that you just kill over and over, that's why there's this long list of creatures, each one with a unique model.
![]()
if you havent realised almost all games are repetitive, wc3 is very very very repetitive. the custom maps make for alot fo variation tho. but you cant argue that WoW is more reptitive, because there is so much content that its difficult to do the same thing over and over without either playing the game for alot more time than you would have played wc3 (thus making it more for your money) or by doing something you really enjoy, like how i enjoy instances over and over.
Ash, 1, 2, 3? I'd say there is more buttons and skills in WoW than all the races combined in wc3. I don't think either game is comparable. They are completely different games, and it's just whether or not you like MMO or RTS more.
you Dont Have To Buy Wow...
I don't understand this comment at all.Numbers.... But what do each one do?
Again not following you.Its not hard to compare.... Which develops more understandings?
Obviously Wc3 because you can edit. Does this mean any game that is editable is better than all games that aren't? I'll answer that for you.... no it does not.What can you do more things in?
What exactly are you comparing? What you can do? In WoW you can do a shit load with that one person. A lot more than your whole army in wc3. You can work on around 5 different skills (fishing, cooking, ect.), you can go hunt things, you can PvP, you can explore a vast world, you can.... and on, and on.In Wc3 you can make single heroes control entire armies...
In WoW you only get one hero with a bunch of spells.....
You can't compare! You can talk about what you like over the other (your opinion), but you can't compare. Except graphics. That you can. Otherwise they are totally different.You can compare its just people dont want to
"Does this mean that any game that has good graphic is better than all games that aren't? I'll answer that for you.... no it does not."Does this mean any game that is editable is better than all games that aren't? I'll answer that for you.... no it does not.
Hurr, yes you can.You can't compare! You can talk about what you like over the other (your opinion), but you can't compare.
Um... ask questions instead of being an arrogant aholeI don't understand this comment at all.
Again... ask questions...Again not following you.
Yes it does... depending on how in depth you can edit it...Obviously Wc3 because you can edit. Does this mean any game that is editable is better than all games that aren't? I'll answer that for you.... no it does not.
What exactly are you comparing? What you can do? In WoW you can do a shit load with that one person. A lot more than your whole army in wc3. You can work on around 5 different skills (fishing, cooking, ect.), you can go hunt things, you can PvP, you can explore a vast world, you can.... and on, and on.
You can't compare! You can talk about what you like over the other (your opinion), but you can't compare. Except graphics. That you can. Otherwise they are totally different.
To me, when you compare, you take similar things and look at which one is better. The only similarity between these two is the fact that they are both video games, and are made by the same company, with the same story. Oh I guess you can compare storyline, and character development, setting, and environment.
I don't understand this comment at all.
Again not following you.
Obviously Wc3 because you can edit. Does this mean any game that is editable is better than all games that aren't? I'll answer that for you.... no it does not.
What exactly are you comparing? What you can do? In WoW you can do a shit load with that one person. A lot more than your whole army in wc3. You can work on around 5 different skills (fishing, cooking, ect.), you can go hunt things, you can PvP, you can explore a vast world, you can.... and on, and on.
You can't compare! You can talk about what you like over the other (your opinion), but you can't compare. Except graphics. That you can. Otherwise they are totally different.
Okay.Um... ask questions instead of being an arrogant ahole
Again... ask questions...
As MSBB pointed out, this indeed helps, but again does not make one better than another. Imo, most wc3 maps suck. Very few are good enough to play.Yes it does... depending on how in depth you can edit it...
People get obsessed with some games just because of graphics or storyline...
The fact you can edit a game brings a lot of potential in terms of gameplay as well
THe only things you can't mess around with is the number of people that can play at once...
Which wow beats Wc3 in...
So why exactly do you own wc3 and are active on a wc3 site? To make more futuristic games? Well why not use C&C or something.But I don't like the theme...
I like techno... Robots... Drugs... Trips... Souls... All they have is Midevil times bullshet...
I'd like you to go on a test server and battle players. See if it's all that easy. Granted there may be less skill in WoW than wc3, there is still enough to make it fun.In WoW you can battle... and do stupid Little things like in runescape... Like "Herbology" (Which is basically just collecting tons of stuff just to get one little thing done)
The combat is just Point in the right direction and click as fast as you can...
-But Archers cant do that....
I enjoy being a healer actually. Not sure if you were being sarcastic, but I'm guessing you were.As For buffing and Healing... thats all it is.... Your a betch for the other players... Just managing and making sure your players are alive and enemies are dying...
WHich is cool...
As much as I support Wc3:WoW, no rpg/orpg in wc will ever be as good as WOW imo.You can also do the same with editable games....
Fir enough, you can. Thanks to MSBB for pwning me and pointing out that you shouldn't bother is better than saying can't.You can compare...
Some like coding, others don't. Doesn't make one better than the other.Game possiblities...
-WoW has Point in the right direction, CLick as fast as you can, Level Up/Item System, Managing enemy and ally Health and Buff system...
-Warcraft is whatever you can figure out in Jass and Gui, which I don't think includse the point in the right direction or Click as fast as you can (THough you can detect clicking by clicking a unit that allways is in front of your camera) Level up and item system possible... Managment is all about the Alt key...
How does editing affect graphics, unless someone releases a patch to upgrade them.Graphics...
-Wow is going to be better to avoid lag for warcraft....
-But Wow is uneditable... while Wc3 can create Arthas playing on the guitar and you can fight with him... or Mushroom warriors... or Master Cheif from halo... or A giant Dildo... Many more possibilities...
Not following you. I don't understand the maximize are and minimilize cheapness part.Number of People
-Wow Beats Wc3 in Number of People
-Wc3 however can try and make each game a pure one on one game and the gameplay as awesome as possible and make each game maximize the area while minimizing cheapness...
Thanks. Mind explaining?I think your blind.
Period.
Ur a noob. Stfu.IMO all posts get a passive debuff of -50% credibility when they mix up with you're and your.
Oh crap MMO terminology!
Anyways, it bugs me when people state their opinions like fact. You should say things like, you prefer editing games to actually playing them, or that MMORPG's aren't your favorite, because you don't care for items making people better than others, not skill. Ect.
1) Random capitalization kills my eyes.
2) Than and then mistakes, as common as you're and your as with were and we're. The internet makes you stupid.
3) There are more vocabulary than 'douche' I think.
4) Over-use of periods/dots has the same effect as 1).
Just commenting kkkkkk? FREEDOM OF SPEECH YO!
Just commenting kkkkkk? FREEDOM OF SPEECH YO!
That's what I'm doing if you're still wondering 'wut the fok'.
I don't think I'm arrogant, please point out how I was.You certainly are overly arrogant...
You should watch your tone...
If you want discussion act like it instead of being a douche\
why was he just a diouchebag to you?
You can't compare! You can talk about what you like over the other (your opinion), but you can't compare.