- Joined
- Mar 7, 2005
- Messages
- 804
Anyways, please refrain from the silly incendiary remarks all of you, they help no one and only hurt the readability and primary discussion of the topic.
![]() |
I guess I won't bother replying to your second statement, I'd probably lower myself to a level where you have more experience.
shit bricks/a brick
To become extremely worried or frightened.
Anyways, please refrain from the silly incendiary remarks all of you, they help no one and only hurt the readability and primary discussion of the topic.
Here are some other things that are 'insignificant': reputation, the icon next to your name for banned users, and the site style. Guess what? All of those things get discussed regularly on the basis of aesthetics. Do you know what that makes them to people who like sites looking pretty? Significant.Steel_Stallion said:You people are getting way too serious over something as insignificant as signatures.
Saying something benign in a way so that its connotation is just as negative as that of name-calling is in essence as bad as name-calling. Either way, though, enough.Karawasa said:See above.
Here are some other things that are 'insignificant': reputation, the icon next to your name for banned users, and the site style. Guess what? All of those things get discussed regularly on the basis of aesthetics. Do you know what that makes them to people who like sites looking pretty? Significant.
Because you set up a straw man that the point I was making was insignificant and therefore should not be considered. Furthermore, you are currently employing an ad hominem argument to make the way I post appear as an attack upon you in order to discredit my stance on the matter.Steel_Stallion said:What's the point in quoting me and attacking something that doesn't really help the issue at hand in any way?
Of course they are, but appealing to popularity does not make the conclusion that they could be improved false.Steel_Stallion said:People like these aesthetics because we don't care about your "privilege" and "earn the right" bullshit, we like shiny colors and flashy signatures and most of the site is damn satisfied with them currently AFAIK.
I love WC3C and it's my home and all, but I wouldn't be posting here if I didn't feel that I could seriously improve the website. I need only for the people in charge to listen to me and for the others that aren't to understand me.
Please, staff, consider the presented arguments and base your decision on sound logic.
I just now noticed your signature is juuust cut off.and no I won't make a greasemonkey script for it. Go make your own.
I only need a sane development environment to work in.I need only for the people in charge to listen to me and for the others that aren't to understand me.
Kaitech, a rep-to-signature system would be a horrible idea as it is unfair to both those with low rep (low rep does not mean stupid) and not representative of those with high rep (high rep does not mean even half intelligent).
I just made my sig, and I had to resize it, took, 2 minutes?
Just resize them and get on with life, it REALLY doesn't matter.
Just do this...
Way to be immature and also miss the point.
I don't see anything other that someone being unhappy because and image they want is 20 pixels to tall.
Just seems like complaining for no reason to me.
If enough crazy posts go by, maybe they will close the thread,
But really, what is the point of complaining about the signiture size being to small. There is no reason to complain... Just a waste of time.
It is their site, if you want it different, make your own.
Case closed.
I have made my own site, thank you very much. You're right, it is their site but that doesn't stop one from trying to suggest improvements. If they decide against it, that is absolutely their right. You seem to be of the type that just likes to preserve the status quo for no apparent reason.
I just don't understand why people complain about things that are not bad/broken/hindering, or anything of the sort.
I just don't understand why people complain about things that are not bad/broken/hindering, or anything of the sort.
lolDoOs_101 said:I did complain in wc3c about their policy on overly excessive criticisms for map submission
And if the complaints held themselves to the same standard of rationality that you feel the policies lack then it would indeed be a wonderful idea. But this thread is full of question-begging and misguided references to informal fallacies, my favorite being the post where Dusk cites straw man, ad hominem and ad populum arguments and gets them all wrong. It's really quite laughable what was being passed off as "logic" here.I like the idea of complaining the site's authority on policies that we think does not rationally work.
I doubt Vexorian banned you for something so innocuous. Either the ban came from someone else or you did a lot more than you're letting on.CG reported me to Vexorian for pollution and he ip banned me. Didn't even think he spend a minute on a map.
No, the context in which he cited them is correct (with a little bit of bending of the definitions of the fallacies).[Rising_Dusk] gets [all the informal logic fallacies he cited] wrong
And if the complaints held themselves to the same standard of rationality that you feel the policies lack then it would indeed be a wonderful idea. But this thread is full of question-begging and misguided references to informal fallacies, my favorite being the post where Dusk cites straw man, ad hominem and ad populum arguments and gets them all wrong. It's really quite laughable what was being passed off as "logic" here.
I doubt Vexorian banned you for something so innocuous. Either the ban came from someone else or you did a lot more than you're letting on.
Large signatures are just annoying, they're fine as they are.