- Joined
- Feb 25, 2007
- Messages
- 286
Yea I know its a mess. Thats why I was working on it for 30 mins XD
I saw that and was ready to hand out some hardcore wtfpwnage... well at least link to my big post, because I don't think I could ever repeat such a colossal amount of pwnage about rep in another post ever again....did someone say free reppy rep rep rep rep?
And then you saved yourself with that.(preparses for Teh_Ephy's firey wrath) nah im kidding i think that THW deserves the highest rating...what did wc3campaigns ever do for me....?
The Chieftain has added a powerful feature that auto-magically truncates overly large signature files.
Examine Shados' file in the first page of this thread: that's the signature by which all others are now measured. If a signature is of larger dimensions, a scrollbar is now provided.
Users may indeed have excess material in their signatures.I think we should keep it in bounds to save loadtime, but I guess you can add more text without punishment.
Signature files that are greater than the maximum will be scrolled: such files are still susceptible to the assessment of rep penalties at the discretion of moderators, although I myself am rather unlikely to impose any for that reason alone.I don't see why you should be punished. A scrollbar works fine for me.
I do not have any desire (or time) to play signature police by sending out PMs and following users around complaining about their signature files. Once again, any moderator may impose negative reputation penalties at any time for any valid reason.Make the users with the signatures comply so I don't have to...
(I BELIEVE that) Ralle has disabled further sig image uploads
Best philosophy in the world.Adam Savage said:I ignore your reality and substitute my own.
It was annoying because I scroll with the middle mouse button and it got caught on peoples sigs lol.
According to my research that database is still updated on a daily basis: Information, Statistics, GraphsOh yeah, did none of you see Whitehorn's post? Voting for the Hive is useless, as that database was abandoned a long time ago and no ones uses it anymore.... so says he anyway.
I have added to the reputation of many users who have the voting link visible in their signature files. Please contact me if I seem to have missed you.
- Give me two weeks to see who's interested in promoting our voting link. If I don't rep you by 15 June, send me a PM!
Can we request to have the signature image upload back?
The Chieftain has disabled the image uploads himself. That feature will not be reimplemented: he wants signature images to be hosted elsewhere.(I BELIEVE that) Ralle has disabled further sig image uploads, hence all new signature images must be hosted elsewhere.
But why is that, when it's so much easier to upload them here? Besides it seems that the limit size is extremly small, so it can't take up that much space.The Chieftain has disabled the image uploads himself. That feature will not be reimplemented: he wants signature images to be hosted elsewhere.
I tend to agree because images hosted here would be most stable: they couldn't fail even if ImageShack (or whatever other hosting site) were to experience downtime.But why is that, when it's so much easier to upload them here? Besides it seems that the limit size is extremly small, so it can't take up that much space.
Reputation is measure of how well people think of you. That's the way it should be observed anyway.
my Wc3c theme
Should I speak to him myself?
I agree, besides, I don't really feel like hosting every image at ImageShack, it just sucks.
1,1 | 1,2 | 1,3 |
2,1 | 2,2 | 2,3 |
3,1 | 3,2 | 3,3 |