• Listen to a special audio message from Bill Roper to the Hive Workshop community (Bill is a former Vice President of Blizzard Entertainment, Producer, Designer, Musician, Voice Actor) 🔗Click here to hear his message!
  • Read Evilhog's interview with Gregory Alper, the original composer of the music for WarCraft: Orcs & Humans 🔗Click here to read the full interview.
  • The Hive's 22nd Icon Contest: Creep Abilities is now concluded, time to vote for your favourite set of icons! Click here to vote!
  • ✅ The POLL for Hive's Texturing Contest #34 is OPEN! Vote for the TOP 3 SKINS! 🔗Click here to cast your vote!
  • ✅ The POLL for Hive's Techtree Contest #20 is OPEN! Vote for the TOP 3 FACTIONS! 🔗Click here to cast your vote!

Images' "Locust"

Status
Not open for further replies.
Can you clarify on what you mean? Photoshop? Paint.net? Gimp?? You 3d blender program or whatever?
 
I think you can create a replica of an image. Basically you loop through every single pixel in a image and get the color of the pixel. Then you re-draw the image pixel by pixel.

This is only possible if you're using programming though. Me and a few class mates did something similar to that in C# XNA.

edit: It should work in theory anyway x)
 
I think you can create a replica of an image. Basically you loop through every single pixel in a image and get the color of the pixel. Then you re-draw the image pixel by pixel.
Why on earth would you want to do that? If you already have the image in memory then you can perform a bulk copy operation on it which will likely execute several times faster. If not then a copy is automatically generated when you load the image into memory so there is no need for another one unless you want to retain a copy of the original as well.
 
You can do it via HTML, not BBcode (unless Ralle adds it). But it's otherwise pointless because you can circumvent such silly protections easily with chrome's page inspector or any text editor.
 
Why on earth would you want to do that? If you already have the image in memory then you can perform a bulk copy operation on it which will likely execute several times faster. If not then a copy is automatically generated when you load the image into memory so there is no need for another one unless you want to retain a copy of the original as well.

I am not good at programming so I didn't know. I just said it was possible, not that it was the best way x)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top