Then tell me Pyritie, who should fix the mistakes half a year later?
Maybe some of the other judges got some spare time and is willing to do it?
Then tell me Pyritie, who should fix the mistakes half a year later?
What if instead of trying to judge him which would take time and be a mess if he won (What would you do the previous winner?) we could just give him an honorable mention and maybe a few rep points. Its not quite as good as getting a fair shot at the competition but it would hopefully end the issue without too much duress on ether side.
IMO that's still kinda lame. And if the results are rearranged and Pharaoh ends up winning it, it won't be a mess, it will actually stop being a mess by the fact that no one was unfairly disqualified.What if instead of trying to judge him which would take time and be a mess if he won (What would you do the previous winner?) we could just give him an honorable mention and maybe a few rep points. Its not quite as good as getting a fair shot at the competition but it would hopefully end the issue without too much duress on ether side.
What if instead of trying to judge him which would take time and be a mess if he won (What would you do the previous winner?) we could just give him an honorable mention and maybe a few rep points. Its not quite as good as getting a fair shot at the competition but it would hopefully end the issue without too much duress on ether side.
I like this idea.
So in clearer terms, the disqualifications are being upheld? If the disqualifications are deemed correct by the arena moderation, then skip the honorable mention and stuff.
Because it either has to be (a) the two contestants correctly being disqualified, resulting in no awards to them whatsoever; or (b) the two contestants being reinstated into the compo, have their entries judged and then dish out the original awards (if any).
I really don't think we should have something in-between. It sets a bad precedent.
The arena moderation must take a side, however unjust it may seem. Either uphold the disqualification or have the disqualified entries judged.
I also attempt to be on neither side, but this 'in between' solution is worrying.
As a damage control it is as good as it gets. But as a rule-setting precedent (to future contests) it is nowhere.
If there is a similar problem occurring in a future contest, the persons involved could have just referred back to this incident as a precedent and award their contests multiple 'winners'.
The arena moderation must take a side, however unjust it may seem. Either uphold the disqualification or have the disqualified entries judged.
Definitely.
How about a poll? I vote for judging those two disqualified entries.
5. On a personal note, this is the last message I submit on the Hive Workshop forums. Working on a map for half a year and then having it rejected from the site's Map section without any explanation whatsoever and having my questions and messages thoroughly ignored for another half year, leave me with no desire to repeat the experience. I'm moving on to greener pastures
- Again in you 'SoulTear'-Trigger you start a non perodic timer with 0.00 duration, I don't get this, why not just calling
the method?
Finally!
And congratulation to the winners!
Im really glad about my own judging cuz i was about to give up but at the last minute i thought of linking the passive with the ultimate and added that crappy spell (which is terrible but i had no time).
It doesnt work if u call the method![]()
Hm for me it worked, sure that u called the method from the
right struct instance?
sorry I had exams
EDIT: okay so
darkyvm - 1st
alext - 2nd
dingo - 3rd
pharaoh_ and spencenator - honorable mention
is this correct?
the score wouldn't be fair unless the judge redid everything
and there are an awful lot of entries
Wouldn't you wait a little longer for fair judging?
Wouldn't you wait a little longer for fair judging?