- Joined
- Jun 17, 2007
- Messages
- 1,433
You both should feel very ashamed.
For what? Its not like I could go to the shops and buy an English copy of WC3 back then. When I could I did.You both should feel very ashamed.
For doing something morally wrong?For what?
= =, this could destroy our online community(even though i'm not an american)
That's not a very good assumption.
You have to figure in the fact that this is infact a gaming media based website. So it stands to reason that we are going to talk about gaming related topics. Its the same reason you see more threads here about how people hate WoW than you see threads about Tibetan slaughter.
My ultimate point here is that instead of arguing about something silly like piracy being immoral, which it inherently is, you guys should discuss more important things.
Sorry for trying to enhance the level of discussion on this site so we don't come off as a bunch of immature retards complaining about whether or not we'll get to watch 'lets plays' when hundreds of thousands of people are having their rights violated by legislation from a similar group.
I always have 0 intention of buying any game until I've played. Like someone already mentioned in this thread, demos and trials do not show the full content of the game, and Battle.Net is an important part of the game.En_Fuego said:However, for that brief window when DSG, Rui, etc were downloading the pirated version they had 0 intention of buying the game.
The Person who made this bill clearly doesnt know atleast 1% of GAMES
It's rejected, you can all go home now.
It's rejected, you can all go home now.
So far I've seen no evidence of the bill being rejected.
You chaps write excessively and each post seems to be a reproduction of the 100 posts above it.
"The free communication of ideas and opinions is one of the most precious of the rights of man. Every citizen may, accordingly, speak, write, and print with freedom, but shall be responsible for such abuses of this freedom as shall be defined by law."
But if the Bill gets passed, wouldn't it then NOT violate this?![]()
Why does this thread still exist? @_@
You chaps write excessively and each post seems to be a reproduction of the 100 posts above it.
simply blown out of proportion... people are getting way to worried about this stupid rule.. A vast majority of youtube is gaming, and if thats taken away, youtube will have a problem on their hands, Besides... you dont think youtube and others would have people fighting against bill S.978. On top of that, gaming companies are purposely allowing us to post gameplay videos because it is free advertising for their companies. They would probably say something about it as well.
I'd rather step a cockroach twice and hard, rather than giving him a chance to live.
> B.net 2.0 doesn't have chat channels.
> Anonymous tip Blizzard HQ will get bombed
> B.net 2.0 has chat channels.
er... what?