PurgeandFire

it's just not a right time to learn struct so the options are just those two, which one do you prefer?

EDIT:
and how about my last snippet? I know it has a very bad namings so please help me D:
I hate that my signature is so yellow

which do you prefer?
globals
private Table ItemIndex
private Table ItemType
private Table ItemIcon
private Table ItemCategory
private Table ItemCooldown
private Table ItemCharge
endglobals

set ItemIndex.integer[dex] = 1
....
set ItemCharge.integer[dex] = 99

or
globals
private TableArray ItemData
endglobals

// 1 to save index
set ItemData[1].integer[dex] = 1
....
// 7 to save charge
set ItemData[7].integer[dex] = 99
// or
// 1 to save index
set ItemData[dex].integer[1] = 1
....
// 7 to save charge
set ItemData[dex].integer[7] = 99

?

help me D:
especially in EDIT 3

hiho. I write to you because I see you again rejecting a ressource in spell section with comment "post code, please".

I fully understand you want code in description, it's just faster to review and else if you don't hace wc3 it even only makes it possible. (think have seen once a post by you that u dont have it installed anymore)

[stable]
----------
It is preferred for spell/system code to be posted in the description.
----------
[/stable]
I think this should be changed in rules to a must-have. At the moment you may think that you can still choose it by yourself if you post code or not.

There are also spells approved with no code in description, but if some ressources get a "Need Fix" only because of that it should be changed in the rules maybe.

can you give my new submission a quick review bcs it's simple as fk.. you are my only hope thanks

well, just things that you know =P
dynamic indexing, static indexing and such, like hanky's for example :/

may I ask you? logically, locally order a unit (ex. order it to use an ability) will causes desync, doesn't it?
thnks

EDIT:
somehow I found a way to revive the left/right click feature

yo purge,

can you tell me about Indexing history? please

I meant inventory theme or something like that. you know, by replacing unit's texture in-game

hey, do you agree that changing inventory UI in-game is so much useless?

Thanks!

I have just realized I can't give order to unit to move above the trackable, I mean I cant target the terrain, which means left/right click feature is failed
it's impossible to use unit, because:
- I will lost drag feature
- slower I guess

EDIT:
and the trackable height z is not working, they still have 0 z
set track = CreateTrackForPlayer(TRACKABLE_PATH, TrackX, TrackY, LOCATION_Z, 270., TrackPlayer)
LOCATION_Z = 2000.0

here is the result

I changed the coordinate to (0, 0)
and the LOCATION_Z to 2000.0 the destructables are correctly created at 2000. but the trackable not. and even they are not facing 270. degree :/

oh, my, trackable problem has solved.. mega rep+ <3

oh, I understand..
local Track track = CreateTrackForPlayer(TRACKABLE_PATH, startX, startY, 0., 270., trackPlayer)
you store the player into global..
thnks a lot

Reputation (+1):
(Bundle) I'm a fan of this system. sure thing I will use this on my future game this is totally awesome

is there any thread in thw which explain it, I'm still hardly understand, yeah, I understand how it works but I dont understand on how to run something in a new "thread" :/

I have tested the system again and yes, it's desync, but strangely players disconnected after several minutes :/

EDIT:
I use this code
if j == 0 then
call CreateDestructableZ(UI_CORNER_BOTTOM_LEFT, LOCATION_X + UI_SPACE * j, LOCATION_Y + UI_SPACE * i, pn*LOCATION_Z, 270., 1., 0)
elseif j == ext_j then
call CreateDestructableZ(UI_CORNER_BOTTOM_RIGHT, LOCATION_X + UI_SPACE * j, LOCATION_Y + UI_SPACE * i, pn*LOCATION_Z, 270., 1., 0)
else
call CreateDestructableZ(UI_BORDER_DOWN, LOCATION_X + UI_SPACE * j, LOCATION_Y + UI_SPACE * i, pn*LOCATION_Z, 270., 1., 0)
endif
if GetLocalPlayer() != p then
call ShowDestructable(bj_lastCreatedDestructable, false)
endif but seems like the destructable is not hidden. what's wrong?
sorry for bothering you so much..

wait, what is this? bj_FORCE_PLAYER[0]
I still don't get what do you mean by running on different "thread"

do you know why is this occurs? the debug message is displayed, which means it doesn't hit the op limit. but not all trackable is created D:

current code
private function initTrackable takes nothing returns nothing
local player p = GetEnumPlayer()
local integer pn = GetPlayerId(p)
local real startX = LOCATION_X - TRACKABLE_EXPAND_AREA
local real startY
local Track track

loop
exitwhen startX > InventoryAreaMaxX
set startY = LOCATION_Y - TRACKABLE_EXPAND_AREA
loop
exitwhen startY > InventoryAreaMaxY + TRACKABLE_EXPAND_AREA
set track = CreateTrackForPlayer(TRACKABLE_PATH, startX, startY, 0., 270., p)
call RegisterClickEvent(track, function onClick)
call RegisterHoverEvent(track, function onHover)
set startY = startY + 32
endloop
set startX = startX + 32
endloop
call BJDebugMsg("end")
endfunction

Then I tried to use normal trackable creating then it works perfectly:
[IMG]
code
private function initTrackable takes nothing returns nothing
local player p = GetEnumPlayer()
local integer pn = GetPlayerId(p)
local real startX = LOCATION_X - TRACKABLE_EXPAND_AREA
local real startY
local trackable track

if GetLocalPlayer() == p then
loop
exitwhen startX > InventoryAreaMaxX + TRACKABLE_EXPAND_AREA
set startY = LOCATION_Y - TRACKABLE_EXPAND_AREA
loop
exitwhen startY > InventoryAreaMaxY + TRACKABLE_EXPAND_AREA
//set track = CreateTrackForPlayer(TRACKABLE_PATH, startX, startY, 0., 270., p)
set track = CreateTrackable(TRACKABLE_PATH, startX, startY, 270.)
//call RegisterClickEvent(track, function onClick)
//call RegisterHoverEvent(track, function onHover)
set startY = startY + 32
endloop
set startX = startX + 32
endloop
endif
call BJDebugMsg("end")
endfunction
perhaps something wrong inside Track or I did ssomething wrong?

EDIT:
wait, the problem is not your Track.. it's still hitting the op limit -___-

EDIT 2:
I have updated the code in the thread, please help me about that op limit D:

it doesn't hit the op limit anymore, thanks for the solution

if op limit is something like maximum number of operations can be done in one function call so, I think blizzard should remove that op limit if we run it on map initialization ( will automatically separate the operations and just increase the loading time instead of breaking the operations), I guess you are agreed with me too..

EDIT:

local real maxX = (LOCATION_X + (ITEM_SLOT_WIDTH + 4) * UI_SPACE * (pn + 1)) + TRACKABLE_EXPAND_AREA
local real maxY = (LOCATION_Y + (ITEM_SLOT_HEIGHT + 10) * UI_SPACE) + TRACKABLE_EXPAND_AREA
local real startX = (LOCATION_X + WINDOW_DISTANCE * pn) - TRACKABLE_EXPAND_AREA
and instead of calculating them on each call, I think I will just gonna save inventory area maxX, maxY, etc into variable when creating the interfaces, because I guess I probably can use it later.. what do you think? which is better?

op limit? what's that? :/

hey, sup?
I got problem about initializing the small tracks
here is the func

private function initTrackable takes integer pn returns nothing
local real maxX = (LOCATION_X + (ITEM_SLOT_WIDTH + 4) * UI_SPACE * (pn + 1)) + TRACKABLE_EXPAND_AREA
local real maxY = (LOCATION_Y + (ITEM_SLOT_HEIGHT + 10) * UI_SPACE) + TRACKABLE_EXPAND_AREA
local real startX = (LOCATION_X + WINDOW_DISTANCE * pn) - TRACKABLE_EXPAND_AREA
local real startY
local player p = Player(pn)
local Track track

loop
exitwhen startX > maxX
set startY = LOCATION_Y - TRACKABLE_EXPAND_AREA
loop
exitwhen startY > maxY
set track = CreateTrackForPlayer(TRACKABLE_PATH, startX, startY, LOCATION_Z, 270., p)
call RegisterClickEvent(track, function onClick)
call RegisterHoverEvent(track, function onHover)
set startY = startY + 32
endloop
set startX = startX + 32
endloop
call BJDebugMsg("end")
endfunction
The debug messages is nnot displayed, which means, I guess, the loop is not finished. What is probably causing this? then how can I fix it? thnks before

Reputation (+4):
(Post) Spot on!

Reputation (+4):
(Post) (+4) You're awesome.

Are you greeter too around here?

xD It's okay.

Reputation (+4):
(Post) thanks dude

Can you play on more than 1 region or do you need two accounts for 2 regions?

Dude I sent you a request in Hearthstone. Hope to PvP you soon )

Well, it was worth a try
Good day to you

Reputation (+1):
(Post) Thanks for helping.

HI. Happy April Fools Day from me too. You have a thread to move

Yo! Happy April fools man!

EDIT: I meant fools, not fool lol. Fixed.

Reputation (+2):
(Post) That's... really helpful.

Reputation (+1):
(Bundle) + rep

Reputation (+2):
(Post) You're da man

Reputation (+1):
(Post) Thanks for the great help!

Reputation (+1):
(Post) Thank you for your response.

Reputation (+1):
(Post) that helped me

There won't be a difference. The hard drive will just be smaller. I mean if you are using 95% of your Mac's HDD you may feel a difference but because you split it up you won't feel a thing. Windows will not be running while you are in Mac OS X so it won't affect it.

Ah you have more computers, that makes sense. I do too, I just don't bring them both everywhere I go .

Reputation (+1):
(Post) Helpful links

You can always install Windows using BootCamp. That works wonderful.

Thanks for the kind words! If you liked the voices I recommend all of the custom campaigns playlist. Especially the Dwarven one... oh so many dwarf voice variants... =D

Yay! Are you a Mac geek like me?

Thanks!

I'm stalking you.

it will take 0.1-0.5 seconds in press ,0.1-0.5 seconds in release, so it will take 0.2-1.0 seconds delay between press and release?

Reputation (+4):
(Post) thanks. I also have added links to related tutorials.

hey , great man.Could i ask you a question?
I heard someone said the keyboard event has some bug,such as it will cause delay in multiplayer game,is it really?

Tutorial updated: http://www.hiveworkshop.com/forums/tutorial-submission-283/creating-levels-defense-map-249427/#creeplevels