- Joined
- May 19, 2008
- Messages
- 88
what is the best ps3 or Xbox 360.I like ps3.
I've never tried Halo 3 but I've seen Red vs Blue which is awesome but I've played Halo 2 on XBox.
look at his PREVIOUS POST?so what is the best Xbox 360 or PS3
Games should have nothing to do with this topic, but anyhow technicalities wise PS3 wins, PS3 is: a decent bluray player built in, wifi support, slightly better graphics, and.... THEY DONT GET RROD'S (MORE RELIABLE). Xbox: Don't you have to buy a cable to use it via wifi (generally wifi is becoming quite standard in households, atleast where i live)? RRODs, slightly worse overall graphics, a now obsolete HDVD player, for about half the price of PS3.
Just wow, that post failed so much. You're clearly biased towards the ps3:_________PS3_______________________________________Xbox 360____________________
Processor:3.2GHz Cell w/ 7 SPEs 2.0 TFLOPS|| 3.2GHz G5 w/ 3 Cores 1.0 TFLOPS
Memory:256MB XDR @ 3.2GHz 256MB GDDR3 @ 700MHz|| 512MB GDDR3 @ 700MHz
10MB Embedded DRAM.
GPU:550MHz NVIDIA || 500MHz ATi.
Best Display: 1080p Standard Dual Screen Output||1080i Optional Single Screen Output.
Network:1000BASE-T Ethernet Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g||100BASE-TX Ethernet Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g.
Audio: 5.1 Digital || 5.1 Digital
Wireless Input:x7 on Bluetooth 2.0 || x4 on 2.4GHz RF
Storage:Removable HDD *TBA ||Removable HDD 20GB
Dimensions: About 13.5" x 3.25" || About 10.25" x 2.5"
The || is there so you know when it is the Xbox 360 i talk about.
In my oppionen the PS3 wins.
-Drake.
MGS 4 is out months before R2, not the other way around.look at his PREVIOUS POST?
anyhow, im all for the exclusives, so at the moment its the 360 but im not sure how i will think later though
360 has Halo 3, Forza 2, Gears of War(soon 2), Fable 2(later) and Bioshock(Atm)
PS3 has Resistance(soon 2), MGS4(later) and FFXIII(later)
and thats my 2 cents
_________PS3______________________________________ _Xbox 360____________________
Processor:3.2GHz Cell w/ 7 SPEs 2.0 TFLOPS|| 3.2GHz G5 w/ 3 Cores 1.0 TFLOPS
Memory:256MB XDR @ 3.2GHz 256MB GDDR3 @ 700MHz|| 512MB GDDR3 @ 700MHz
10MB Embedded DRAM.
GPU:550MHz NVIDIA || 500MHz ATi.
Best Display: 1080p Standard Dual Screen Output||1080i Optional Single Screen Output.
Network:1000BASE-T Ethernet Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g||100BASE-TX Ethernet Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g.
Audio: 5.1 Digital || 5.1 Digital
Wireless Input:x7 on Bluetooth 2.0 || x4 on 2.4GHz RF
Storage:Removable HDD *TBA ||Removable HDD 20GB
Dimensions: About 13.5" x 3.25" || About 10.25" x 2.5"
The || is there so you know when it is the Xbox 360 i talk about.
In my oppionen the PS3 wins.
-Drake.
Its so hilarious how the Ps3 has such heavy specs compared to the 360. But the 360 games are STILL beating it graphically hands down. Major phail sony.
Then again, microsoft support is the most horrible piece of trash ever made. The 360 is one faulty mother fucking piece of shit. The ps3 is reliable, but the 360 is actually FUN.
I'd go with a 360, since the price cut, and all the exclusives. Its beating the ps3 by far.
Even the Wii beats that black paperweight,
Oh also, i've heard people go like (PS3 HAS FREE INTERNET WHY PAY TO PLAY?)
First off, if you can afford the over priced Ps3, you can afford like 60$ a year. And you get what you paid for, seeing the Xbox live service is fucking win. Compared to the horrible Ps3 service that phails horribly.
Also, stop using MGS 4, its the only arguement people have for the Ps3 these days. If the 360 were using "exclusives" as an arguement, we'd be out numbering you 25 to 1.
How ever, if money is no option and you wouldnt mind spending 3500$, just buy an uber PC. Beats them all combined... if anyone could afford it.
Holy shit. You'd spend that much JUST to play games??!?!
You must be either REALLY rich, or just really stupid. But eh im jealous as fuck either way.
PS3 because it's from Japan. XBOX is from USA and I don't like it.
Some people like me don't want to support companies that are from specific countries.brad.dude03 said:That's the dumbest fucking shit I've ever heard.
meant as inMGS 4 is out months before R2, not the other way around.
1. ps3 specs aren't amazing compared to 360, all it has going is cell and blu-ray.Its so hilarious how the Ps3 has such heavy specs compared to the 360. But the 360 games are STILL beating it graphically hands down. Major phail sony.
Then again, microsoft support is the most horrible piece of trash ever made. The 360 is one faulty mother fucking piece of shit. The ps3 is reliable, but the 360 is actually FUN.
I'd go with a 360, since the price cut, and all the exclusives. Its beating the ps3 by far.
Even the Wii beats that black paperweight,
Oh also, i've heard people go like (PS3 HAS FREE INTERNET WHY PAY TO PLAY?)
First off, if you can afford the over priced Ps3, you can afford like 60$ a year. And you get what you paid for, seeing the Xbox live service is fucking win. Compared to the horrible Ps3 service that phails horribly.
Also, stop using MGS 4, its the only arguement people have for the Ps3 these days. If the 360 were using "exclusives" as an arguement, we'd be out numbering you 25 to 1.
How ever, if money is no option and you wouldnt mind spending 3500$, just buy an uber PC. Beats them all combined... if anyone could afford it.
Yeah but you wont chuck the $3500 PC out the window in a few years, unlike the PS3.
Furthermore, the 360 has exclusives, and a great many games are released on it exclusively before transcending their way to the PC.
I just upgraded the shit out of my PC last August. It plays everything great. I STILL bought a console for those consoley-goodness features, like Xbox Live with all of my casual gamer friends, exclusive titles of course, and a smooth controller.
Not at all true. The CELL CPU can not be compaired to conventional CPUS as far as gaming goes.3500$ PC will have less potential power than the cell CPU.
I'ma buy a Quantum computer in a few years
Premium Console(350),Play and Charge Kit(20), wi-fi(100), xbox live 1 year subscription(50), total: 520. 40 GB ps3(400), Bluetooth headset(50), total: 450. You may find it unfair comparing 40 GB to premium, but 80 vs elite will still have the same results.
The sixaxis feature can be disabled in almost every game, so I hardly see how you can use that as a valid argument.Brad you also know that if you use vista and play a recene xbox to pc convert you still can play xbox live with your consel bretheran?
Well The ps3 and xbox 360 are both goood but i like the xbox 360 more because the syaxas stuff makes me dissy
also FF13, MGS and GTA5. pretty much the only good console games coming out in the future, all ps3 exclusive.
Lmfao. The new Final fantasy, i have seen for the 360. GTA 4 came out on the 360 and did TWICE as good as the ps3 version PLUS its getting Downladble content EXCLUSIVE ONLY to the 360.
So why would GTA 5 be exclusive to the Ps3? And your an idiot to think Halo 3 is the best game for the 360. Thats the only arguement Ps3 fanboyz ever have. "LOLL HALO SUCKED GET PS3". 360 also has better graphics (So far) despite it being about a year and a half older, and overall weaker in specs (Very slightly if you balance it out). So um, ya. Fail.
Edit: Sorry, it was another Final fantasy game. FF XI Online or some shit.
So why would GTA 5 be exclusive to the Ps3? GTA 4 came out on the 360 and did TWICE as good as the ps3 version
360 also has better graphics (So far)
explain how it is better, dont just make statements without backing them up.
its getting Downladble content EXCLUSIVE ONLY to the 360.
no not really, ps3 is much more graphically pleasing,
all future games, especially the big titles, will look awesome
Ps3 online is not laggy. Warhawk can handle 32 players, no lag, compared to Gears of War, with 8.K, um. First off, the multiplayer isnt laggy as shit as with the Ps3's crappy server. Second, like i mentioned but you obviously overlooked.
The Orange Box was a shitty port by EA, not fair to be used as an argument. CoD 4 has been proven to be, at worse, equal on both systems, if not, better on ps3. Most comparisons are extremely biased(there was once a comparison which showed both videos as ps3, and graphically weakened the one displayed as ps3.)No actually, it is capable of being more graphically pleasing, but so far, not only have Xbox 360 exclusives decimated Ps3 exclusives graphically, but third party games (Call of duty, The Orange box...etc.) have been compared to the Ps3. The ONLY advantage the Ps3 has over the 360 in all of those versions is anti-aliasing. The 360 basicly tramples over it in every other aspect.
Ever heard of UNCHARTED?Heavnly sword looks ok, but thats the only exclusive i can really see eye candy in the Ps3. MGS 4 is the only reason for even CONSIDERING getting a ps3. Because theres basicly nothing on it that the 360 doesnt have but is 10 times better.
Nobody gave a damn about Haze, it was released in between GTA4 and MGS4 which shows how pathetic the developers were. KZ and R2 has received much more hype than Haze.Have you heard how Haze failed on an epic scale? putting Ps3 fanboys hopes of a Gears killer to ashes. Oh and guess what, it was an exclusive. Oh and guess what else, it was overhyped to be a revolutionary game.
Ps3 online is not laggy. Warhawk can handle 32 players, no lag, compared to Gears of War, with 8.
The Orange Box was a shitty port by EA, not fair to be used as an argument. CoD 4 has been proven to be, at worse, equal on both systems, if not, better on ps3. Most comparisons are extremely biased(there was once a comparison which showed both videos as ps3, and graphically weakened the one displayed as ps3.)
Nobody gave a damn about Haze