- Joined
- Jun 10, 2004
- Messages
- 594
I think that something needs to be done about the amount of crap that users have been posting on this site. I suggest creating a “Rejected” section, where content that is of poor quality can be sent. There would only be one of the sections, and it would be completely separate from the other sections.
Resources would be sent there from the normal sections by a vote of a certain amount of the sub-moderators for that section; I suggest three. The ability to vote on whether a resource should be sent to the Rejected section would be the only difference between the privileges of a normal user and those of a sub-moderator. Sub-moderators would only be so for the particular section(s) that they met the following criteria for:
- Sub-moderators must have been on the site for at least a week.
- Sub-moderators must have made a certain amount of posts and/or comments to show that they are active members of the community; I suggest around 25 total.
- Sub-moderators must have submitted a certain amount of non-rejected resources for the section that they are to become sub-moderators of. I suggest around three.
Once the user has updated the Rejected resource, they could PM a moderator and ask for it to be moved back to the normal section. In addition, deleting your resource from the Rejected section and re-submitting it in the normal section would be against the rules.
I feel that implementing this system would help greatly reduce the amount of low-quality resources that are submitted to this great site.
~The_Raven
Resources would be sent there from the normal sections by a vote of a certain amount of the sub-moderators for that section; I suggest three. The ability to vote on whether a resource should be sent to the Rejected section would be the only difference between the privileges of a normal user and those of a sub-moderator. Sub-moderators would only be so for the particular section(s) that they met the following criteria for:
- Sub-moderators must have been on the site for at least a week.
- Sub-moderators must have made a certain amount of posts and/or comments to show that they are active members of the community; I suggest around 25 total.
- Sub-moderators must have submitted a certain amount of non-rejected resources for the section that they are to become sub-moderators of. I suggest around three.
Once the user has updated the Rejected resource, they could PM a moderator and ask for it to be moved back to the normal section. In addition, deleting your resource from the Rejected section and re-submitting it in the normal section would be against the rules.
I feel that implementing this system would help greatly reduce the amount of low-quality resources that are submitted to this great site.
~The_Raven