Why discuss something that won't happen?How do you not get it? We're not saying whether or not there ARE going to be heroes in melee, we're discussing whether or not there SHOULD be heroes in melee. DO YOU SEE THE DIFFERENCE, ARISTOTLE?
Why discuss something that won't happen?How do you not get it? We're not saying whether or not there ARE going to be heroes in melee, we're discussing whether or not there SHOULD be heroes in melee. DO YOU SEE THE DIFFERENCE, ARISTOTLE?
ITWhy discuss something that won't happen?
I say itOk! Let's discuss Zerglings with dual plasma cannons and 4 miniguns that shoot rockets!
I say it would kick ass.
Yes, heroes don't always make a game micro, but you must admit that they DO play a huge role in doing so. They concentrate the troops into squads and, because they can only be created in very limited amounts, ruin the concept of macro to some extent. They just won't fit in starcraft.Thing I was saying was, heroes don't make a game mirco management. I used Dawn of War as an example. It has heroes, they do have a couple spells or passives each, but it's not much micro to cast one skill. Besides SC has skills you use, so it has some micro. The reason WC was so micro, was because you only get so many units, and a ton of units have skills, but mostly the amount of units.