Pausing Unit.

[FUJI]

There's alternative use of UnitPropWindow but It's only disable movement like ensnare, what do I like is pausing the units like from disabling them to attack and cast a spell, but seems pausing unit can do that, not UnitPropWindow (
Is there any way??

 

[Malhorne]

Silence where you disable atack and spell
Anyway there is a way to disable only attack and to root someone SetUnitMoveSpeed to 0.

 

[pOke]

Hey jake,
how about ordering the unit you wish to pause to cast a non visible ability based on channel, with the disable abilities tag true and set the follow thru time to the duration of the pause? Couple this with setunitpropwindow so they cannot move, maybe change turnrate to 0 for a very accurate depiction of pause.

Alternatively if the unit should just stand their idle you could stun them with a 0 duration and remove the buff when they should be unpaused

 

[Vinz]

Alternatively, use Drunken Brawler to silence and prevent attacks.

 

[WaterKnight]

You usually want each debuff to only disable one feature because then you can combine it arbitrarily. Those are functions for the header.

 

[Maker]

One option is to additionally order stop when given an order, after a 0.00 duration timer.

 

[FUJI]

@ Malhorne

Thanks! but I don't want to show the message "miss" xD.

@pOke

Nice suggestion about stun ability I'll try that xD thanks!

@Wrathion

Re:Thanks! but I don't want to show the message "miss" xD.

@WaterKnight

What do you mean ?

@Maker

But I want to pause a unit like it will not face the other unit and turning rate to 0.

Thanks all guys for the suggestion +Rep.


( It is from DotA the Chronosphere Ability by Faceless Void )

 

[pOke]

Void's chrono uses the regular pause function xD.

 

[Vinz]

Re:Thanks! but I don't want to show the message "miss" xD.

Disable attacks cause temporary removal of the ability 'Aatk', hence, not allowing you to attack at all and not allowing you to miss consequentially.

( It is from DotA the Chronosphere Ability by Faceless Void )

^Poke already said it.

 

[WaterKnight]

@WaterKnight

What do you mean ?

If you use a spell effect that disables both movement and attack for example, then you can obviously only concurrently disable both, not individually, respectively you would have to build an isolated method for different cases.

Since you would not want to solve the problem anew everywhere (like creating a dummy caster for each part of code and handling it via code), you build yourself central functions you call instead and thereby gain scope-overlapping power (like if you want to switch the implementation later on).

 

[Vinz]

^Oh right. So you could simply call the functions.

 

[Maker]

Try this -> http://www.hiveworkshop.com/forums/...help-trigger-destructible-242447/#post2429754