Obama, although I saw this:
Obama needs to become president oryouwe getWorld War 3: Oil Warstotal anarchy.
Younger people such as myself don't know shit (except for me of course) and if you ask a "Mccain supporter" why he does so they'll say something like "uhhh experience!" then if you ask an "Obama supporter" why he does so they'll say something like "uhhh America needs change and Obama can bring that."
Obama, although I saw this:
Obama needs to become president oryouwe getWorld War 3: Oil Warstotal anarchy.
Right on!
You haven't been keeping up.
He has the power of hope and change. He's practically invincible.
Oh if that were true...
Not me. I'd be a fool to think a man on the opposite side of the country has an affect on my life, and I'd rather pay lower taxes.
Since this is a decision between two people, as opposed to some philosophical question like whether or not there can be peace, I'd hardly care about bias. As well, you don't call it bias when you have reached the correct conclusion.
I'm glad I can assess my statement to be a joke
Isn't the validity of said truth all relative?
The president doesn't even create tax bills
I don't believe you understand the point of candidates outside of the two main presidential nominees.
![Dreadnought[dA]](/data/avatars/m/134/134647.jpg?1465504677){kind=avatar}
But if he did, I still want to pay less taxes.The president doesn't even create tax bills
A minor setback. ;pRon Paul isn't even on the ballot
*shudders at voting for McCain or Obama*
True, I suppose this was more directed towards the person you quoted.
That's one thing you could call it.
Voting isn't mandatory, but as with most cases, I've found that when I dislike both candidates (not true in this election), I often find one to be the lesser of two evils. Then again, since nobody is perfect, and evil is relative, every decision is the lesser of all evils. Or the best of all goods. Whichever way you look at it (half full or half empty?), there's usually a decision that you can make. Although I wont force that down anyone's throat, as I know that I tend to be more opinionated, and thus sometimes exaggerate my opinions in order to solidify them.
steriotypical much?
I feel as if I should be appalled that this even matters, considering it isn't even his personal account, as opposed to the hundred of offenses Palin has pulled by herself, but then I realize that we're dealing with the American media here.
Yes? Of course they are, or should be. For many teenagers, the next 4-8 years will be very crucial in terms of education and occupation, so jobs and education are very much so worth giving a damn about.
Yes, yes it is. I'm not saying there aren't completely biased networks towards the democrats, but Fox news is definitely biased towards the conservatives.
