< Nude Warcraft III > PG?

[A Void]

In this thread I will cover all nude units, textures and models that were presented in Warcraft 3. Be advised that I will censor every image that contains too much. Be aware young viewers of this thread to step back, it will contain censored nudity.

Age Rating Analysis of Warcraft 3:

Age Rating - PEGI

Warcraft III : The Frozen Throne
Blizzard Entertainment SAS
The content of this game is suitable for persons aged 12 years and over only.
It contains: Non realistic looking violence towards fantasy characters
System: PC
Genre: Strategy
Releasedate: 2003-07-04


Warcraft III : The Reign of Chaos
Blizzard Entertainment SAS
The content of this game is suitable for persons aged 12 years and over only.
It contains: Non realistic looking violence towards fantasy characters
System: PC
Genre: Strategy
Releasedate: 2003-06-20

It came to a conclusion that every child above 12 is suitable in the age rating. The further analysis shows that PEGI missed quite a lot of details that were hidden inside the game's models, textures and icons.

Now, this is the list of images that contain nude characters, icons and textures in the game. Viewer Discretion Is Advised!

Nude Content

Models

Icons

Textures

Please comment and share your opinion on: Is the age rating a proper choice for Warcraft 3?
If you have found anything that is considered nude in War3 please share it so that I could add it to this thread.

Those who think that this is far fetched, check the definition of a word: Nude, Nudity.
It's a lack of clothes or no clothes at all. Warcraft 3 Units lack proper clothing, a good example would be Night Elves.

 

[StoPCampinGn00b]

The rating is fine. But WTF?!?!?! Why you.. I give up.

 

[A Void]

The rating is fine. But WTF?!?!?! Why you.. I give up.

Why I? What do you mean? I was browsing the .mpq for my night elf campaign, and I found a lot of textures that were in-proper and some models. So I decided to list them here.

 

[Aeroblyctos]

Nudity, nudity, nudity. What can I actually say? Nudity.

Archer is pretty nude. Uuh.

 

[A Void]

Nudity, nudity, nudity. What can I actually say? Nudity.

Archer is pretty nude. Uuh.

I couldn't agree more.

Edit: Those who think that this is far fetched, check the definition of a word: Nude, Nudity.
It's a lack of clothes or no clothes at all. Warcraft 3 Units lack proper clothing, a good example would be Night Elves.

 

[Deleted member 219079]

Ahahahah Best thread ever!

 

[chobibo]

Yeah, best thread.

 

[Deleted member 219079]

Omg I'm dying he has Gargoyle in the list XD

 

[Heinvers]

So? the gargoyle kuku is hidden anyway

 

[Deleted member 219079]

I've just never thought of gargoyle in a sexy way before xD

 

[GunSlinger]

Hahaha! This thread is awesome.
Anyways, the game's camera angle makes it really hard to see these things, add to that the low quality textures. I hardly doubt kids who see these while playing the game would notice but if they would, they won't have any "weird" feelings towards it.

 

[BandolXD]

I thought they are really not wearing anything >_> . Then I just realized they are the real In-Game models.

 

[StoPCampinGn00b]

Hmm, at first I thought you removed some clothing. (But models don't probably work that way )

 

[Footman16]

Is this a joke?

I'm sorry but this just can't be taken seriously, from the low polygons to the Night Elf campaign screen texture which is just a mass of purple I fail to see how this is remotely... anything.

 

[takakenji]

this has always been bugging me for a while. despite loving wc3 myself, now that i'm an adult i would never let my two daughters or son see this profanity... just sick

 

[Go'el]

wtf?
Did you think that Gargoyles and Harpies should wear clothes? Ok then...
But c'mon now, what kind of 12yo boy never saw some boobies??

 

[StoPCampinGn00b]

wtf?
But c'mon now, what kind of 12yo boy never saw some boobies??

This.


Ratings aren't judged by 12 year olds though ^_^

 

[Ezekiel12]

Please comment and share your opinion on: Is the age rating a proper choice for Warcraft 3?

Yes the age rating of 12 is fine.

haha the gargoyle.. Would be even better if you censored the icons nipples ..

But seriously, nobody ever masturbated to wc3. And even if, it would be no sin, right.. right?

Dem sexy critical strike stacking mechanics .

 

[Aeroblyctos]

But seriously, nobody ever masturbated to wc3. And even if, it would be no sin, right.. right?

What? I already masturbated twice reading this thread.

 

[GunSlinger]

Yes the age rating of 12 is fine.

haha the gargoyle.. Would be even better if you censored the icons nipples ..

But seriously, nobody ever masturbated to wc3. And even if, it would be no sin, right.. right?

Dem sexy critical strike stacking mechanics .

Your avatar tho.
Seeing as how famous warcraft is, I wouldn't be surprised If I see rule34 of it.

 

[Go'el]

What? I already masturbated twice reading this thread.

lol
The Gargoyles are sexy indeed...

 

[Vinz]

Nobody even notices anything in game unless you max zoom the model editor.

 

[Deleted member 219079]

Nobody even notices anything in game unless you max zoom the model editor.

Oh really >.>

 

[Vinz]

In game harpies look like they atleast have bras.

 

[saphiree]

Haha, well this just proves rule 34

But why would gargoyles wear clothes? It's not like bears or pigs wear clothes. If you look at it that way, then there is nudity in almost any game with animals in it.

this has always been bugging me for a while. despite loving wc3 myself, now that i'm an adult i would never let my two daughters or son see this profanity... just sick

Really? I feel sorry for your daughters. It's not like this (ultra) mild nudity is going to affect them in any way. Especially not if you don't tell them about this thread. I doubt they'll find out by themselves. Besides it's easy to find way worse things on the internet. Even with little imagination and knowledge of the internet.

 

[Rheiko]

a good example would be Night Elves.

Night Elves are hawt

 

[LordDz]

Remember guys, it's ok to show units explode in gore and getting killed.

But damn you if you show somewhat of nudity!!

 

[Dr Super Good]

Wait what? I did not know that single large pixel represented something unsafe for children. Good lord and here I am with a degree in computer science thinking that a pixel is the smallest resolvable element of a image and now you say that you can see all kinds of details from them like female private parts...

This topic is a joke.
1. Gargoyles are not human. Animals/statues do not require censorship.
2. Sorcress is a lot less nude than most women on a beach. Ever heard of C string?
3. Any kind of body hair is not an indecent image by itself. Saying so would make most mammals "indecent". A lot of humans have hair extend far beyond private bits covering areas from legs to back and although they will hardly win something stupid like super model of the year they certainly are not revealing anything indecent.
4. Harpies are not human. Animals do not require censorship.
5. All textures used in Warcraft III are so low resolution that one can argue any minor detail such as what was pointed out does not exist.
6. Blizzard is a huge company which pays a lot of money to the right people. As such their games get rated well below what the ratings define. This applies to games like Call of Duty and Grand Theft Auto as well. This is the opposite for Nintendo where Super Smash Brothers gets rated 12-14 despite having all characters well censored, very little violence and everything clearly being family friendly.

Please take your nonsense somewhere else such as all those modern games like Mass Effect and The Elder Scrolls which are filled with nude textures.

 

[Go'el]

But this is a joke, so far as I know. C'mon, are you guys taking this seriously?

 

[Aeroblyctos]

Wait what? I did not know that single large pixel represented something unsafe for children. Good lord and here I am with a degree in computer science thinking that a pixel is the smallest resolvable element of a image and now you say that you can see all kinds of details from them like female private parts...

This topic is a joke.
1. Gargoyles are not human. Animals/statues do not require censorship.
2. Sorcress is a lot less nude than most women on a beach. Ever heard of C string?
3. Any kind of body hair is not an indecent image by itself. Saying so would make most mammals "indecent". A lot of humans have hair extend far beyond private bits covering areas from legs to back and although they will hardly win something stupid like super model of the year they certainly are not revealing anything indecent.
4. Harpies are not human. Animals do not require censorship.
5. All textures used in Warcraft III are so low resolution that one can argue any minor detail such as what was pointed out does not exist.
6. Blizzard is a huge company which pays a lot of money to the right people. As such their games get rated well below what the ratings define. This applies to games like Call of Duty and Grand Theft Auto as well. This is the opposite for Nintendo where Super Smash Brothers gets rated 12-14 despite having all characters well censored, very little violence and everything clearly being family friendly.

Please take your nonsense somewhere else such as all those modern games like Mass Effect and The Elder Scrolls which are filled with nude textures.

Come on man! Take it easy. Let's just fap together. You need to relax! One, two, one two. Soon we are there. Think those sexy gargoyles, sorceresses and so on. One two, one two.

 

[Kino]

But this is a joke, so far as I know. C'mon, are you guys taking this seriously?

Exactly, note who the original poster is.

 

[Heinvers]

Yeah, you can't take this too serious. I mean those are just textures, not even a mesh detail in those 'private' parts.

 

[A Void]

But this is a joke, so far as I know. C'mon, are you guys taking this seriously?

This is indeed a joke, some people (Dr Super Good) are too stupid to see a discussion so serious in a Warcraft 3 related topic about nudity. This was just to show that this game also contains nudity and it was to speculate the age rating.

 

[Aeroblyctos]

Just don't jump to reports, okay?

I just to your pants soon.

 

[Halo99]

Is anyone here actually complaining D:?

 

[Orcnet]

Nudity means "no clothing at all", or "Naked", I thought the thread was to visualize models/skins/icons/etc in that manner (e.g removing Unit clothing by model editor, icons drawn resembling private parts).

Also throughout my years of engaging with games, books, media about fantasy genres. Most of them prefer nudity or less clothing to be normal or common, unlike ours which is limited.

I think your pointing nudity based from Humans or humanoids present on the game, the only nude I can see here is the harpy due to resembling human-form features. but I cannot say the harpy is nude because these creatures are Anthropomorphic meaning they can resemble human-like forms but a mixture of animal figures, its like saying a Dog is naked and its troublesome for the public (bad example yet I think its similar lol).

I'm sorry if I sounded blunt on my opinion, I think the thread can give more meaning if the term "Nude" is really used.

 

[trolman]

404

post not found



...hotpockets...

 

[Zwiebelchen]

I could say something about this topic... but I'll just go and submit my personal creations here, that I used to paint proper textures on a new wrap of the Sylvanas and Runner models. Enjoy, you pervs!

[edited out by Zwieb ... sorry bros, just to go sure this topic stays open ]

Btw... if you wonder why the boobs actually look good and not like weird pyramids, that is because I took the freedom to add some polys here and there. 8)
And yes, that is team colored hair.

 

[trolman]

I could say something about this topic... but I'll just go and submit my personal creations here, that I used to paint proper textures on a new wrap of the Sylvanas and Runner models. Enjoy, you pervs!

Click

... and this is what my first "armor" looked like:

Btw... if you wonder why the boobs actually look good and not like weird pyramids, that is because I took the freedom to add some polys here and there. 8)
And yes, that is team colored hair.

And this is exactly why Nudity in warcraft is a sin.

 

[Zwiebelchen]

And this is exactly why Nudity in warcraft is a sin.

Because you can improve on it?
Also, it's not fully nude, they are wearing a skin-colored thong.

 

[Deleted member 219079]

Some guts to post that right after mod subscribed to this thread (if he has auto sub on) I mean, the first one is too revealing imo. I might be over exaggerating though.

 

[gorillabull]

why? it is a relatively realistic rendition of a female human organism.







right?

 

[A Void]

"No pornographic/sexual/vulgar/obscene/gory content
This is not that kind of site. Any topic should be family friendly."

So if we can post half-naked rangers with no bras and skin-colored strap on then why not?

 

[Zwiebelchen]

Hey... and if we say that it's a statue? It should be fine then, right?

 

[A Void]

Hey... and if we say that it's a statue? It should be fine then, right?

As long as it doesn't contain any pornographic content it is fine. Nudity is considered normal in art. But half-naked ranger, a warrior female having no bra or any clothing in the middle is considered already obscene and purposeful thinking.

 

[Zwiebelchen]

As long as it doesn't contain any pornographic content it is fine. Nudity is considered normal in art. But half-naked ranger, a warrior female having no bra or any clothing in the middle is considered already obscene and purposeful thinking.

There's nothing really obscene about it, as it was never meant as a standalone model, but just a template to paint more armor textures on. And you can't deny that it's very useful to have a skin to paint on top if you want to design armor textures. Actually, that's exactly what I was doing as you can see in the next picture.

Plus, I've seen 12+ rated movies with sex scenes and full nudity.