- Joined
- Mar 9, 2009
- Messages
- 6,276
I have to agree.
And so you proceed even further down the very same path I turned around from when I said thus to you: "I'll talk to you when you are capable of being talkable-to"...
Giving up, and "Not wasting time on an effort that is both fruitless, and will merely lead to the unnecessary disturbance of my peaceful, good day", are different things indeed.
>_>
That seems like you're trying to disqualify my arguments by saying I cannot comprehend it, and that I'm not correct etc. WITHOUT giving reasonable arguments as to why. That seems like a typical loser statement.Elenai said:Since I can't convince you of the existence of blue, or the implications thereof: I'll agree to disagree, and leave you to the grey illusion of your choice til such a time when you are ready to discuss colours again, which I assume, will be when your ability to comprehend them efficiently, and especially correctly occurs.
I've been in many discussions and at the end of every discussion I can see in their eyes that they can't come up with any counterarguments to what I just said
The emotion you sense in their eyes is the desire to beat you up, and the statement after is because they behave themselves and end what otherwise would've become violent. When you toss the sore loser accusation back at them you just fuel the fire. You're just lucky people execute self-control.
.. but you're too arrogant to understand.
.. [/off-topic]
As for faith; Blizzard would probably never finish any games if they had no faith they'd finish it. They got a lot of faith, and their fan base has a lot of faith in them, that's how they survive.
Wow, if your not arguing with Elenai your arguing with someone. People, this is a poll, not the final battle between Good and Evil on THW. Do you guys need to argue on every subject?
Arguing is fun when you know what you're talking about and you're 99 (or more)% sure you're correct. Or if you know you're wrong and just want to mess with people (not what I do). If you have no idea about what's being discussed it's not that fun anymore. Oh, and it's not fun if you lose.
The poll needs a "maltheist" option. I hate the idea of a God and think anyone who believes in such a thing is either brainwashed, stupid or similar.
I wonder then why everyone keeps loving Priest or Paladin type of classes. I guess it's because they see the should-be self of theirs devoted to some other existance, an existance that might be true and we are too little to realize.
Even if I'm sure I'm correct there are still others who think they are correct or just doubt that I'm correct. And I have quickly countered pretty much every argument I've seen here which have been tossed towards me.Well if you were almost 100 percent sure that your what your saying is right (and your sources are correct in themselves) then there wouldn't be an argument then right? You'd be absolute and could quickly counter any opposition.
The problem is people that argue in order to win, and/or to blacken the opponent.
An argument is not necessarily hostile, and even if both sides disagree completely the argument can be useful, because an argument isn't always about coming to a mutual agreement, but to learn from the other. It is a great way to obtain knowledge and understanding. The problem is people that argue in order to win, and/or to blacken the opponent.
The problem is people that argue in order to win, and/or to blacken the opponent.
Well this is (Was thankfully) a Religious argument. With the zeal people fight for atheism and theism I don't see either side taking something constructive from the other.
Even though i'm an aethist, i think that christans, and muslims and jews all have alot of very stong, good values. while i do not worship god, i do agree very much with Abhramic values. But many seem to shun or mis-interpret them. infact most do, ad thats why alot of people are really angry. Personally i think religon is good. but its also my personal belief that religon has driven some to do evil, and misguided some, and been manipulated by some for their own purposes. I just don't belive in god. But i do agree with alot of Abhramic Values.
Thats just me.
I agree wholeheartedly with all of that. Look at the terrorists.
Now, look at the few Christians and/or Buddhists that commit their lives to helping others.
Religion goes both ways, the sad part is that it weighs down toward negative.
Look here!
I am a Muslim be more sensitive D:
and before you post about a certain topic you need to study it from all it's area's
now do what Flat said.
Religion of Peace practicers have no humour, especially when it comes to cartoons D:
And Joe: Tell them to cancel that damn International Funcongress here in Amsterdam D:
Religion of Peace = Muslims? God.. Islam is just a RELIGION, HUMANS are HUMANS! Sense of humour? That comes from an individual person, not from a group/organization/religion. Cartoons? Rofl.
PS : I'm a muslim too.
shiiK said:* Passively non-religious
You are certain that there is no maker, but you refrain from judging religion
(Typically a positive atheist[as per definition by Gora in 1972])
insider myself passively non-religious:
Humour is culture, culture is greatly influenced by religion, thus humour is affected by religion. Objective opinions aside, Muslims are incredibly sensitive to blasphemous humour. We almost got ourselves a 9/11 some time ago, for something we (in our culture) considered a joke and a part of how our culture is. Though let's not go there.
On the other side of the spectrum, I have met plenty nice Muslims. It's not like the whole religion is a bunch of terrorists.
Muslims have tried to assassinate a Danish artist for drawing a rendition of Muhammad which I found rather humorous myself.
On the other side of the spectrum, I have met plenty nice Muslims. It's not like the whole religion is a bunch of terrorists.
Because people base their actions on things that do not exist. If you're going to do the right thing, you've got to base your actions on fact and logic. Religion has destroyed so much and so many and it will continue to do so as long as it exists. It hinders progress like nothing else. It stops people thinking and they misuse it to justify all their actions, however bad. And if you can't justify what you've done.. Well, God forgives everything, right? So you don't have to worry about it.I really don't understand why some Atheists feel so compelled to destroy religion.
The whole religion is not a bunch of terrorists. It is not because Bin Laden is a terrorist or some other random guys are terrorists that Muslims are.
I respect all religions, and yes, there are plenty nice christians, etc.
About renditions of Muhammad : It is "Haram" to represent/draw/refigure/defigure/caricature for humor Muhammad. Haram is.. Well don't know the word in english. In french it's "péché". And a big one.
Because people base their actions on things that do not exist. If you're going to do the right thing, you've got to base your actions on fact and logic. Religion has destroyed so much and so many and it will continue to do so as long as it exists. It hinders progress like nothing else. It stops people thinking and they misuse it to justify all their actions, however bad. And if you can't justify what you've done.. Well, God forgives everything, right? So you don't have to worry about it.
That's a tiny part of why people want to destroy religion.
Because people base their actions on things that do not exist.
I don't want to make infinite gods out of finite men. Everything's finite and I can actually accept that. Religion exists because of extreme human egocentrism. I on't care if all humans are gone tomorrow.
Narrow minded? You can't get much more narrow minded than believing only what has been written in one single book and rejecting everything else in the name of 'faith'.