Deleted member 219079
D
Deleted member 219079
I will start this thread by sharing this amazing fan depiction of the characters' lives after the movies had taken place. I did not expect the plot twist in the end!
Harry Potter influences and analogues - WikipediaHarry Potter is trash [...]
You did not mention the video games.[...] What do you think of the books, movies and the currently produced Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them? [...]
"Dumbledore took a deep breath. ‘The odd thing, Harry,’ he said softly, ‘is that it may not have meant you at all. Sybill’s prophecy could have applied to two wizard boys, both born at the end of July that year, both of whom had parents in the Order of the Phoenix, both sets of parents having narrowly escaped Voldemort three times. One, of course, was you. The other was Neville Longbottom."
excerpt from 'Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix'
The Order of the Phoenix said:“Then — it might not be me?” said Harry.
“I am afraid,” said Dumbledore slowly, looking as though every word cost him a great effort, “that there is no doubt that it is you.”
“But you said — Neville was born at the end of July too — and his mum and dad —”
“You are forgetting the next part of the prophecy, the final identifying feature of the boy who could vanquish Voldemort. … Voldemort himself would ‘mark him as his equal.’ And so he did, Harry. He chose you, not Neville. He gave you the scar that has proved both blessing and curse.”
“But he might have chosen wrong!” said Harry. “He might have marked the wrong person!”
“He chose the boy he thought most likely to be a danger to him,” said Dumbledore. “And notice this, Harry. He chose, not the pureblood (which, according to his creed, is the only kind of wizard worth being or knowing), but the half-blood, like himself. He saw himself in you before he had ever seen you, and in marking you with that scar, he did not kill you, as he intended, but gave you powers, and a future, which have fitted you to escape him not once, but four times so far — something that neither your parents, nor Neville’s parents, ever achieved.”
“Why did he do it, then?” said Harry, who felt numb and cold. “Why did he try and kill me as a baby? He should have waited to see whether Neville or I looked more dangerous when we were older and tried to kill whoever it was then —”
“That might, indeed, have been the more practical course,” said Dumbledore, “except that Voldemort’s information about the prophecy was incomplete. The Hog’s Head Inn, which Sibyll chose for its cheapness, has long attracted, shall we say, a more interesting clientele than the Three Broomsticks. As you and your friends found out to your cost, and I to mine that night, it is a place where it is never safe to assume you are not being overheard. Of course, I had not dreamed, when I set out to meet Sibyll Trelawney, that I would hear anything worth overhearing. My — our — one stroke of good fortune was that the eavesdropper was detected only a short way into the prophecy and thrown from the building.”
I have written "Among fan theories", and I never said (nor implied) Pottermore was a fan site.Btw, Pottermore is J. K. Rowling's website, it's more than a fan site![]()
In fact, I am not a fan at all.I just assumed you were't fan enough to know everything about Pottermore![]()
Maybe its origin could be traced back to Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets (and its early drafts), since J.K. Rowling considered Neville Longbottom's own journey of discovery to be "more important to the central plot", than the one of Dean Thomas in this book.Anyway, I'm wondering what could the arguments in favour of that theory be, because the book is very explicit about this issue.
I think 3 was a turning point, assuming a darker theme.I only know the movies. 1&2&3 were quite childish, kinda logical with the main chars beeing kids.
I agree! A TV show would have allowed much more details to be shown, they could take their time exploring the story and the universe.I feel like I would've liked them a lot better if Harry Potter had been a TV show instead of a film series.
I never read the books (I'm more of an ASOIAF fan) but I enjoyed the movies, though I feel like I would've liked them a lot better if Harry Potter had been a TV show instead of a film series.
Also, I find this funny:
writemyessayonline will help with your studies
Is life real anyway? Escaping unreality with more illusion. Is it good? A matter of perspective, rather perception?The whole point of fairy tales is that they're not supposed to be so real life! If I'm reading a book about witches and wizards, clearly I'm trying to escape my reality right? I want to be transported to a DIFFERENT world, where the laws of our world don't necessarily carry over!
Is life real anyway? Escaping unreality with more illusion. Is it good? A matter of perspective, rather perception?
What is insanity if not varied perception?You are a crazy one my friend. Very fickle...
What is insanity if not varied perception?
Exactly. But which are which?there are good perceptions and bad perceptions!!
Exactly. But which are which?
How do you know? Who decides? You? People? What about nature, the universe, the all pervasive force?The bads are the ze opposite!
The good ones are of purity, honesty, willpower, patience, kindness, generosity, loyal, etc. Getting married, having kids, being educated, helping old people, respecting children & animals.
The bads are the ze opposite!
What does that mean? Uneducated people are inherently bad?
And helping old people is good? What if an elderly person asked you to buy cocaine because he or she is unable?
JK Rowling is ruining her own franchise tbh
No ma b'woy....
It means that those who can be educated, but choose to not and instead waste away life loitering around in places, in search of easy pay via a life of crime are bad!
And obviously you wouldn't exactly do that with an old person, but I mean the normal old people.
Yeah basically it's good vs evil, but it's often more subtle than that: Snape, Draco Malfoy, Fudge, Scrimgeour, Croupton Sr... are not 100% bad or 100% evil characters. And even those who are labelled "good characters" have their flaws, like Dumbledore or even Harry.It's one of those good vs evil, surprise good guys win which I am tired of.
Sadly yes. Overall, the wizards world is quite coherent, but when you start looking at the details, many parts of the scenario seem illogical. But I think it still works! I still enjoy reading the books from time to time, even if, like you, I wouldn't have enjoyed them that much if I had read them as an adult the first time.A lot of logic breaking when you start to think about it.
My girlfriend and I don't want to get married and have children, does that make us bad people?The good ones are of purity, honesty, willpower, patience, kindness, generosity, loyal, etc. Getting married, having kids, being educated, helping old people, respecting children & animals.
I think it's more of a symbolic matter. Say, how fellows in England have secret cults and knowledge and that power and influence would be what makes your enemy lose in the end.The battle for Hogwarts would have been laughable if any side brought a machine gun to the battle. Everyone beside Voldemort would be gone.
Oh man, can't wait to get to the third book and read the time-turning shenanigans! I'm reading the books in English for the first time at the moment.Somewhat cheap, yup.