• Listen to a special audio message from Bill Roper to the Hive Workshop community (Bill is a former Vice President of Blizzard Entertainment, Producer, Designer, Musician, Voice Actor) 🔗Click here to hear his message!
  • Read Evilhog's interview with Gregory Alper, the original composer of the music for WarCraft: Orcs & Humans 🔗Click here to read the full interview.

Divorce Agreement

Status
Not open for further replies.
Level 17
Joined
Nov 18, 2008
Messages
1,538
DIVORCE AGREEMENT

Dear American liberals, leftists, social progressives, socialists, Marxists and Obama supporters:

We have stuck together since the late 1950's, but the whole of this latest election process has made me realize that I want a divorce. I know we tolerated each other for many years for the sake of future generations, but sadly, this relationship has run its course. Our two ideological sides of America cannot and will not ever agree on what is right so let's just end it on friendly terms. We can smile and chalk it up to irreconcilable differences and go our own way.

Here is a model separation agreement:

Our two groups can equitably divide up the country by landmass each taking a portion. That will be the difficult part, but I am sure our two sides can come to a friendly agreement. After that, it should be relatively easy! Our respective representatives can effortlessly divide other assets since both sides have such distinct and disparate tastes.

We don't like re distributive taxes so you can keep them. You are welcome to the liberal judges and the ACLU.

Since you hate guns and war, we'll take our firearms, the cops, the NRA and the military.. You can keep Oprah, Michael Moore and Rosie O' Donnell (You are, however, responsible for finding a bio-diesel vehicle big enough to move all three of them).

We'll keep the capitalism, You can have your beloved homeless, homeboys, hippies and illegal aliens.

We'll keep the hot Alaskan hockey moms, and rednecks.We'll keep the Bibles and give you NBC and Hollywood .

You can have the peaceniks and war protesters. When our allies or our way of life are under assault, we'll help provide them security.

We'll keep our Christian values.. You are welcome to Islam, Scientology, Humanism and Shirley McClain. You can also have the U.N.. but we will no longer be paying the bill.

We'll keep the SUVs, pickup trucks and oversized luxury cars. You can take every Subaru station wagon you can find.

You can give everyone healthcare if you can find any practicing doctors. We'll continue to believe healthcare is a luxury and not a right.

We'll keep The Battle Hymn of the Republic and the National Anthem. I'm sure you'll be happy to substitute Imagine, I'd Like to Teach the World to Sing, Kum Ba Ya or We Are the World.

We'll practice trickle down economics and you can give trickle up poverty your best shot.

Since it often so offends you, we'll keep our history, our name and our flag.

Would you agree to this? If so, please pass it along to other like minded liberal and conservative patriots and if you do not agree, just hit delete. In the spirit of friendly parting, I'll bet you ANWAR which one of us will need whose help in 15 years..

Sincerely,
John J. Wall
Law Student and an American

P.S. Also, please take Barbara
Streisand & Jane Fonda with you.
 
Level 17
Joined
Nov 18, 2008
Messages
1,538
Sounds awfully stereotypical.

lol yeah.

I forgot to put my word in. It has some interesting points that are true of most of my friends and family who are liberal. But it is still very stereotypical. And it is not as if the right-wing is without its' numerous flaws.
 
Level 19
Joined
Jul 19, 2006
Messages
2,307
That letter is So. Much. Win.

That is all.

fascism-799165.jpg
 
DIVORCE AGREEMENT

Dear American liberals, leftists, social progressives, socialists, Marxists and Obama supporters:

We have stuck together since the late 1950's, but the whole of this latest election process has made me realize that I want a divorce. I know we tolerated each other for many years for the sake of future generations, but sadly, this relationship has run its course. Our two ideological sides of America cannot and will not ever agree on what is right so let's just end it on friendly terms. We can smile and chalk it up to irreconcilable differences and go our own way.

Here is a model separation agreement:

Our two groups can equitably divide up the country by landmass each taking a portion. That will be the difficult part, but I am sure our two sides can come to a friendly agreement. After that, it should be relatively easy! Our respective representatives can effortlessly divide other assets since both sides have such distinct and disparate tastes.
Ok now let's build a huuuge wall.

We don't like re distributive taxes so you can keep them. You are welcome to the liberal judges and the ACLU.
Where's you're money comes from in the 1st place?

Since you hate guns and war, we'll take our firearms, the cops, the NRA and the military.. You can keep Oprah, Michael Moore and Rosie O' Donnell (You are, however, responsible for finding a bio-diesel vehicle big enough to move all three of them).
Guns protect people from other really evil people yeah.

We'll keep the capitalism, You can have your beloved homeless, homeboys, hippies and illegal aliens.
Beloved homeless are generated by capitalism.What he's calling "illegal aliens" means illegal immirgrants.

We'll keep the hot Alaskan hockey moms, and rednecks.We'll keep the Bibles and give you NBC and Hollywood .
No comment.
You can have the peaceniks and war protesters. When our allies or our way of life are under assault, we'll help provide them security.
Last news there never had war on american territory (excluding civil war).So you mean protecting your way of life in other people's country.
We'll keep our Christian values.. You are welcome to Islam, Scientology, Humanism and Shirley McClain. You can also have the U.N.. but we will no longer be paying the bill.
Religion, none is worthier than other.

We'll keep the SUVs, pickup trucks and oversized luxury cars. You can take every Subaru station wagon you can find.
If you can produce it without those "illegals aliens" who reclaim redistributive taxes.

You can give everyone healthcare if you can find any practicing doctors. We'll continue to believe healthcare is a luxury and not a right.
So does affording to pay it.

We'll keep The Battle Hymn of the Republic and the National Anthem. I'm sure you'll be happy to substitute Imagine, I'd Like to Teach the World to Sing, Kum Ba Ya or We Are the World.
don't give a damn.

We'll practice trickle down economics and you can give trickle up poverty your best shot.
Must be bullshit.

Since it often so offends you, we'll keep our history, our name and our flag.
La la la.

Would you agree to this? If so, please pass it along to other like minded liberal and conservative patriots and if you do not agree, just hit delete. In the spirit of friendly parting, I'll bet you ANWAR which one of us will need whose help in 15 years..

Sincerely,
John J. Wall
Law Student and an American

P.S. Also, please take Barbara
Streisand & Jane Fonda with you.
You think it's so true I think it's so bullshit.
This is the perfect example of the retarded dickhead who think geographicaly separating 'good thing' from 'bad thing' will solve all the probleme
 
Last edited:
Level 14
Joined
Nov 20, 2005
Messages
1,156
Okay, however the capitalist bit has to give up all its infrastructure, employees, capital, armies, and, well, pretty much everything, since those 'redistributive taxes' paid for them.

Oh, and due to the fact that you'd never have avoided a violent revolution by the oppressed poor in the 1930s without the New Deal, you're all going to be shot in a reenactment of what would have happened. And your republican political systems will be dismantled too.

Wait - you want all the good bits without paying any of the costs? A utopia where everyone is rich and infrastructure wonderful and armies plentiful, but no taxes, no manual labourers, no poor to oppress for the work force?

And you also want no differences in political opinion, while having no interference from the state? So what if someone has a difference of opinion? Then your non-interfering state goes all Nazi on them?
 
Level 34
Joined
Sep 6, 2006
Messages
8,873
I like how people that tell at me to learn to take a joke, are trying to defend Liberals, even though this is just a joke.
 
Level 40
Joined
Dec 14, 2005
Messages
10,532
I like how people that tell at me to learn to take a joke, are trying to defend Liberals, even though this is just a joke.
Gilles, I think you fail to realize how retarded a large fraction of the population is. I still highly doubt this was a joke (leet's post was, but the original sender). Either that, or it was likely in parody of something they actually heard.
 
Level 12
Joined
Feb 23, 2007
Messages
1,030
I love the OP for his bravery. I'm in the same boat with being sick of Obama lovers/liberals.
You missed, "You can take all the homosexuals, bisexuals, and necrophiliacs with you"

Wait never mind you said Hollywood.

I disagree with the vehicles part. The only thing good about Obama is his green stance so I support anything to prevent global warming. Big SUVs and trucks are part of the problem.

Trickle down economics works to an extent, but does anybody really deserve billions of dollars... TAX FREE!?
Businesses will only trickle down as much as necessary.

Health care for everyone is a great idea, just make it cost money to be fat.
 
Level 12
Joined
Feb 23, 2007
Messages
1,030
I mostly have intermediate ideas, but when you live in the state of Washington, there are soooo many liberals here and Obama fans that you just can't help but build up hatred towards them. There are about 20 posters in our school promoting Gay-straight alliance. I'm not mean or anything towards gays, but just the thought of them creeps me out. Sends shivers down my spine.
 
Level 22
Joined
Feb 26, 2008
Messages
892
1. The letter is satire.

2. I don't know how the US got liberals to be the big government people, but it disturbs me to no end. I always have to draw a distinction between classical liberalism and modern liberalism, because they are completely different.
 
Level 14
Joined
Nov 20, 2005
Messages
1,156
1. The letter is satire.

2. I don't know how the US got liberals to be the big government people, but it disturbs me to no end. I always have to draw a distinction between classical liberalism and modern liberalism, because they are completely different.

I think a positive / negative liberal split is more appropriate and (should) work globally. If it disturbs you, then you simply have far too little understanding of different conceptions of liberty.

Plus you're probably under the strange delusion that property rights as Americans so love to go on about are actually philosophically justified. Most philosophers would probably disagree that they are intrinsically justified (notice the intrinsically there), even if they believe there is a way that property rights can exist and be intrinsically justified.

Think about this for example - how is your ownership of land enhancing liberty? It may enhance your liberty over the land, but for everyone else in the world, it destroys their liberty. Now, if I were to go and try and camp on "your" lawn, what would happen? Oh, and I have 20 armed guards, so don't bother trying to turf me off yourself. So what's to stop me?

Oh. Right. Big government. Yea. So really property rights are the government infringing on my liberties.
 
Level 40
Joined
Dec 14, 2005
Messages
10,532
2. I don't know how the US got liberals to be the big government people, but it disturbs me to no end. I always have to draw a distinction between classical liberalism and modern liberalism, because they are completely different.
3. I don't know how the US got conservatives to be the big government people, but it disturbs me to no end. I always have to draw a distinction between classical conservatism and modern conservatism, because they are completely different.

(Insert any other term). Words change. That doesn't make them bad.
 
Level 24
Joined
Jun 26, 2006
Messages
3,406
In my experience, crazy liberals are more frustrating to deal with than crazy conservatives. Both of them use bad science, but at least crazy conservatives also have the bible. Like "MEH BIBLE" versus "MEH... MEH".
 
Level 14
Joined
Nov 20, 2005
Messages
1,156
In my experience, crazy liberals are more frustrating to deal with than crazy conservatives. Both of them use bad science, but at least crazy conservatives also have the bible. Like "MEH BIBLE" versus "MEH... MEH".

In my experience, crazy conservatives are more frustrating to deal with than crazy liberals. Both of them use bad science, but at least crazy liberals don't just assert the bible. Like "MEH... MEH" versus "BIBLE SAYS NO".
 
Level 24
Joined
Jun 26, 2006
Messages
3,406
Griffen, I just find it more tolerable if someone has a reason for being ignorant and completely idiotic (which is still completely intolerable behaviour). Crazy conservatives have that in the form of the bible, while crazy liberals only have other crazy liberals. Of course both are completely intolerable to be around, but I find crazy liberals to be more so than crazy conservatives. It's also easier to resent crazy liberals since I have more things in common with them than I do with crazy conservatives, so crazy liberals make me look bad.
 
Jhow J. Wall (the guy who posted this crap on his blog) is an example of crazy conservative.He's not hilarious he's just stupid, it's hilarious only if you find stupidity and ignorance hilarious then you must be stupid as well.

Conservatism is an ideology of blindminded who refuse to see obvious fact and reassure themselves with order and moral valor they've been taught.

Liberalism is an ideology of sissy providing extremly moderate changes.
 
Level 24
Joined
Jun 26, 2006
Messages
3,406
Extremely moderate like handing everybody a ribbon on field days so nobody feels bad? God forbid our children should learn to be competitive. It's not like the things that make up the real world, college and job applications, promotions, etc. are that way anyways.
 
Level 12
Joined
Feb 23, 2007
Messages
1,030
I appreciate moral values and tradition, I also believe we need to change things for green.

I think welfare programs are taken advantage of too much. I think the rich evade taxes too much. Liberals I fear will eventually destroy all moral values and society will become a perverted blob of porn and fat people (too late).

Liberals also think raising minimum wage will actually help the economy.

So mainly I just have problems with conservatives disregard for the environment and supporting the wealthy just a little too much.
 
Level 26
Joined
Mar 18, 2007
Messages
3,669
I generally find liberal extremities to be more tolerable than conservative ones, if only for the reason that I'd rather a person that doesn't get anything done than a person that ends up doing something incredibly stupid, and a person that's easily subject to cultural trends than a person that will never change his opinion.
 
Level 24
Joined
Jun 26, 2006
Messages
3,406
I would rather err through action than inaction. At least you did something instead of sitting back and watching.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top