- Joined
- Nov 12, 2007
- Messages
- 2,340
Ideas spawned in the other thread and I arbitrarily narrowed them down to these few topics, as the discussion was too wide and inconclusive. Vote on what you think is a viable change here. Voice your opinion leaving a post below, and you may give other suggestions too. If you aren't satisfied with the current arena, please participate.
What is the point of any given contest?
(Ofc this isn't in the poll, but this is relevant to the discussion)
Is it to have fun, to increase the number of resources, to engender community, or as 'tests of skill' to determine who is best at something? Or some combination?
(Ofc this isn't in the poll, but this is relevant to the discussion)
Is it to have fun, to increase the number of resources, to engender community, or as 'tests of skill' to determine who is best at something? Or some combination?
[1st topic] Obligatory minimum of 2 judges.
"What if there isn't another judge?" We'll discuss this scenario in case this topic is voted enough.
[2nd topic] Increase Public Poll decision power to 33%:
Judges: 66%; public poll: 33%.
[3rd topic] Same percentages and poll rules for all contests:
Same percentage of judge/public poll ratio in final score;
Same rules for applying multiple-choice or single-choice polls in all contests. Right now we don't have rules for this.
[4th topic] Justified Public Poll votes:Same rules for applying multiple-choice or single-choice polls in all contests. Right now we don't have rules for this.
Votes in Public Polls will only be considered if the user leaves a comment, encouraging people to actually bother analyze the entries.
Last edited: