Wall of text
FALSE.
I was a lot more naive yesterday than I am today. In some ways, you could say I was "stupider" then, or "smarter" now. This is every day of my life. But, unlike more people, there is no point in time at which I have been wrong.
See, I went through a perhaps different phase than most people. I believed children would do a better job at running the world. Yes, that is incorrect, but I was not wrong. I simply hadn't realized yet that it wasn't adults that were the problem. It was people all along. I wasn't wrong; I was just out of focus; my focus was too specific.
And then I ran out of time and had my train of thought hijacked so you had better reply to this so I can get back on track. >:V
Furthermore I agree that a lot of times teenagers think they have problems with adults, while truly they have problems with people.
Being an adult means you are legally responsible for yourself, and it does not always relate to being mature.
First of all I wanna point out that I made this thread NOT because of my own feelings (no one cares) but because these things happen to some of my friends and some other guys I know. Second, I never said anything about parents being bad to their kids.
But back to my point: I mainly made this thread because I don't understand why these guys don't speak up.
P.S. I reposted this one because I didn't include the word "NOT" in the first sentence in the previous one (was trying to type something else there, probably got deleted and I didn't notce).
I'm 14, with a website, very helpful person.
Age doesn't matter. Maturity does.
Grow the fuck up and realize that when your father told you that it's not okay to drink at the age of 13 or smoke a joint instead of going to school he was right.
Good lord, the irony.Smoking a joint is more useful than going to school, like practically everything else is. I learned next to nothing there.
You seem to like repeating yourself while others has explained the "problem" thoroughly already. Please stop repeating the question after the answer.
Edit: Ah, so they removed your comment and you posted it again, why? You've already received the answer. Why repost a question you've had answered?
I deleted my comment myself and then reposted it fixed.I didn't edit because if people had already read it they wouldn't go back to read it again.
That's it, you owe me 50 bucks for the braincells destroyed by that statement. You break em' you buy em'.
Good lord, the irony.
Hurp durp schul don't matter, gettin high does. Smoke weed errday!
I dint lern nuttin from schul iz ther fault not mine!
I wonder where you learned how to spell your sentence and use proper grammar and vocabulary use.
I was raised with spankings and paddlings, and am perfectly fine.
Don't read it if you don't get it.
So what, you're saying that in highschool and college you don't learn anything of value?Since the thread was about teenagers, it seemed kind of obvious to me I was not talking about primary school, where you do, in fact, learn lots of useful things.
Well the other guy copped out, so I'll take up this one: Yes, that is what I am saying. (Sort of. :V)You're saying that in highschool and college you don't learn anything of value?
True.In highschool and college you don't learn anything of value.
Sure we have. I don't see any reason we couldn't have entirely failed to improve education in the last, oh, half century? Supposing we did develop them the least bit, that's hardly significant if it's the least bit. Supposing it was significant, who's to say we did it right? Maybe, for all we've changed, we've gotten worse just as much as we've gotten better, in our eternal struggle to improve.We have not had these school systems for an incredibly long time without developing them the least bit.
This aspect only has merit if there is merit in college.Highschool will also prepare you for college.
True.All humans need are elementary knowledge of the most basic subjects taught in school.
False.A doctor will only need to know how to play the boardgame Operation.
True.You are supposed to learn all this from experience.
False.This obviously makes no sense either.
False.That's the economy's problem; not the education's.
Is someone attempting to alleviate themselves of blame? ;DYou must understand it was easy to make this mistake.
Hardly. Interesting, sure. But useful?The only subjects that taught me some things I still find valuable are physics, chemistry and drawing.
So I wonder. Maybe you're only talking about college. That seems to be a rather popular opinion nowadays, that college is way too expensive and pointless. I agree at some degree. There are flaws with colleges today. Especially with today's job market, which leaves many with college education without jobs. However, that's the economy's problem; not the education's. College is there to allow you to choose what you want to learn, and experience a little what it is you want your profession in the near future to be. This is of course not at all pointless, as when you graduate from highschool it is very rare that the student will have planned his life out. Of course, you will also excel in the subject you choose to study in college, allowing you to contribute to society properly with a profession of choice.
College is also a social experience, and offers more than education in those turfs.
Excuse me for mistaking you for someone who smokes. You must understand it was easy to make this mistake.
Someone has not looked at the payment laws in the UK. Until you are 18 (an adult) you are not allowed to really work. You can still do some work but you are limited in hours (less than an adult) and have a much lower minimum wage (many pounds an hour lower). There are also restrictions on the type of work that can be done.Isn't it possible that most "age discriminations" are just coincidences or simply related to inexperience in younger people?
Not funny.I laugh at you... HA.
Smoke weed every day... ♫ ♫ ♫
Most countries, you need to pay to get education.Well, expensive? That one only applies to the American education system then. Wait, scratch that. Anyhow, not only is the Swedish equivalent to college/university free, we get paid.
If there's age discrimination, it definitely have nothing to do with education.There is a guy in the Swedish parliamentary who was 18 years old at the time he joined it.
Isn't it possible that most "age discriminations" are just coincidences or simply related to inexperience in younger people?
Someone has not looked at the payment laws in the UK. Until you are 18 (an adult) you are not allowed to really work. You can still do some work but you are limited in hours (less than an adult) and have a much lower minimum wage (many pounds an hour lower). There are also restrictions on the type of work that can be done.
The only reason the hours of work and type of jobs are restricted is to stop people being able to exploit child labour and forgo with almost all adult employment (as adults cost more).
Which is one of the awesome things about Sweden. ;DMost countries, you need to pay to get education.
Which is one of the awesome things about Sweden. ;D
Sweden, Denmark, Norway and Finland too right?