- Joined
- Jun 30, 2023
- Messages
- 24
Can .zst files be added to the supported file extensions for attachments?
It's a compression format that has gained a lot of traction in recent years due to blazing fast decompression speed (easy on clients) and good compression speed. Currently it's even natively supported by all major browsers, as well as 7Zip since v24.01 and WinRAR since v6.10.
In practice, it's good for compressing map packs. For a comparison, a map pack of 73 maps totaling 57.9 MB, when processed by different tools:
From the comparison, ZStandard steamrolls .rar in all aspects, and only loses minorly to .7z in compression rate (28.67% vs 32.82%), while having a notably better speed profile.
While it's not natively supported yet, I have been uploading map packs with the odd extension
It's a compression format that has gained a lot of traction in recent years due to blazing fast decompression speed (easy on clients) and good compression speed. Currently it's even natively supported by all major browsers, as well as 7Zip since v24.01 and WinRAR since v6.10.
In practice, it's good for compressing map packs. For a comparison, a map pack of 73 maps totaling 57.9 MB, when processed by different tools:
Code:
Tool | Size | Compression Time | Decompression Time
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
NONE | 57.9 MB | N/A | N/A
WinRAR (.rar+Normal) | 56.8 MB | 8 seconds | < 2 seconds
WinRAR (.rar+Best) | 56.8 MB | 8 seconds | < 2 seconds
7Zip (.7z+Ultra) | 16.6 MB | 9 seconds | 3 seconds
7Zip (.zst+Ultra) | 19.0 MB | 3 seconds | < 2 seconds
From the comparison, ZStandard steamrolls .rar in all aspects, and only loses minorly to .7z in compression rate (28.67% vs 32.82%), while having a notably better speed profile.
While it's not natively supported yet, I have been uploading map packs with the odd extension
.tar.zst.rar
, which is suboptimal to say the least.