(8 ratings)
1/5 seems a bit harsh.Looks like a piece of plastic, and have nothing to do with metal or fire.
Oh, really?The light definitely doesn't behave this way on the plastic material. This should be taken in consideration, before comments that I couldn't describe otherwise, unless inexperienced comments.
And please, don't be so proudful. It's counter-productive behaviour for cummunity. Try to compare your axe to others in Icon Section and you will realise that your one really aren't that great as you are trying to prove.I honestly don't know why I still spending my time trying to keep hive alive in memory of peoples who aren't longer here.
And please, don't be so proudful. It's counter-productive behaviour for cummunity. Try to compare your axe to others in Icon Section and you will realise that your one really aren't that great as you are trying to prove.
Also, from my experience, you do not pay any attention to comments of reviewers, so rating is a acceptable tool to draw your attention.
The best way!Using rating to make author update his work is a not productive behavior in a creative community either.
Because users are free to ignore or disagree with given reviews. For you it should be irrelevant whether they'll accept it or not, your only concern should be making sure that reviews contain constructive criticism upon which icon may be improved. When it happens that author doesn't accept review, you don't push them, you either approve or reject icon, based on its quality.
Also don't compare works to show that someone's icon is better or worse, do it to give ideas to author on how certain aspect can be made in a different way, shading for example. But then it needs to be explained why comparison is being made.
I don't think any legit drawn icon deserves 1/5 rating. And based on quality, this icon deserves more than 1/5 or 2/5 rating.
I have compared works to show, that his Icon miss some things - for example axe sharpness. Or better hightlights that are common for metalic material.Also don't compare works to show that someone's icon is better or worse, do it to give ideas to author on how certain aspect can be made in a different way, shading for example. But then it needs to be explained why comparison is being made.
You could have come up with the rating, after he did the improvements By rating it instantly 2/5 on his first upload, will surely demoralize him a bit and might not work to improve it :/I have compared works to show, that his Icon miss some things - for example axe sharpness. Or better hightlights that are common for metalic material.
Rating is the thing that can be changed anytime it is needed. As long as this icon do not break any rules it will be approved, so the rating is the last and main thing that can show my impression from it - this icon need improvements.You could have come up with the rating, after he did the improvements By rating it instantly 2/5 on his first upload, will surely demoralize him a bit and might not work to improve it :/
You misunderstand me. I don't say you don't have to rate it, I just pointed out that would have been nice to do that after he did the improvements. For him feels different, trust me.Rating is the thing that can be changed anytime it is needed. As long as this icon do not break any rules it will be approved, so the rating is the last and main thing that can show my impression from it - this icon need improvements.
Let's not jump into shaggy conclusions.@KILLCIDE I think @Shar Dundred is pointing out the fact that you might be too easy and forgetful with the icon reviewer's verdict on this post and previous ones. It looks like he is abusing of the position he has. And @Shar Dundred is just trying to open your eyes, I guess.
Look, he actually improved it Searing Axe2 Looks great. Also, your point of view is really nice and is the feedback that he should have received.What is wrong with you, guys? Everyone has a style. This must at least take a 4/5. It might be lacking in texture (which I doubt Blizz would also be perfect in that aspect), but this is great in perspective and really close to Blizzard's style. With some texture, a little more shading and maybe some fiery effects due to the name (which I think is not that important), this would be a 5/5 in terms of it's own style. This is not supposed to be metallic, it's a searing axe daring to be different from the other artists' icons found here, and I think deserves a 4/5.
I would name it Axe of Searing Heat yes! It would be suitable addition in the WE item section no!Whoa, definitely major improvement. I would love to smack somebody with that in combat!
I am still not feeling the fire in this weapon yet. There is just a little heat to be felt behind the blade. There isn't much Flame in the Flaming Axe. Currently it feels more like "Molten Edge Axe" or "Heat Blade Axe".
With those 2 icons being available, I can see two uses Blacksmithing, as described previous with more steps.
AND the axe becoming hotter and hotter in the wielders hand burning both enemy and wielder!
Still loving the description!
Currently 3/5 or 4/5
Give it some fire/heat effects and it would be the weapon of choice for leading the army.
4/5 or even 5/5?
regards
-Ned
Flaming Axe of Burning Searing Heat of Smithing Lava Fire !I would name it Axe of Searing Heat yes! It would be suitable addition in the WE item section no!
Scorching Axe of Burning, Hephaestus Axe of FireFlaming Axe of Burning Searing Heat of Smithing Lava Fire !
(I am trying to make a reference to that anime but I don't remember it exactly :| )
regards
-Ned
Unfortunately, it is in the rules that resources have to have fitting name.because obviously i had to jump in too the axe can look however its cares to look like and the author is free in terms of that,
the quality looks smooth and sharp and the improved version is very nice, what maxwell did in my opinion was judge the axe because its named Searing Axe to which is what i myself did in another icon to which he told me i have no rights to tell an artist what to name his icon.
but i said the "name" was not proper yet in here he says the "icon" is not good just because it's not matching the name "searing as in fire and etc like idea"
so maybe you can learn from what you told me yourself deer maxwell.
as for Macros you can continue to "DAB" on dem haters
ref: Icon Submission RulesSubmissions must bear a fitting title
ref: General Resource RulesA proper description must go along with the resource.