I saw your discussion...
----------
As a bystander who doesn't participate in most of these concepts, I'd like to note that most of the time, those random, if cool-sounding, sample names are more of a confusion and hinderance than they are a boost. At least from my perspective. Honestly, I think the original way of naming concepts makes more sense("Modeling Contest #64 - Giant Robots", for example, or "Hero Contest #89 - Neutral Races").
----------
... and I have to say I agree completely. This has been a consistent issue in a variety of contests hosted here. "Atlas of Destruction", "Fantasy Weds Modern", "In Search of the Coldest Breeze", "Seal of Magus", "What Lies on the Other Side", "<<<Reeeewind" (what?)...
And if examples are needed, well, I'm a great one. My Zephyr #10 entry was essentially invalid due to my misunderstanding (though I prefer "creative interpretation") of the whole concept (despite it referencing "portals" (which mine arguably had, sorta)). "Seal of Magus" would've gotten me if I could get past the 'descriptions' long enough to even make an entry.
Just my two cents. Let me know if you need me to testify.