- Joined
- Apr 24, 2012
- Messages
- 9,802
Right?
It's not only one, it's infinite. Like how a Vayne Q can dodge most ADC skillshots, except it has <attack speed> cooldown.She can poke Kalista once she has used her dash.
This is assuming that she's an adc, which she isn't all so dangerous as.
You do realize that we are talking about a fast paced skill based game?It's not only one, it's infinite. Like how a Vayne Q can dodge most ADC skillshots, except it has <attack speed> cooldown.
Most melee toplaners still don't get to abuse her lack of kill potential, because her disengage is simply so strong.
I can beat vayne, even though it's sometimes a hard match-up. Yet, kalista isn't even possible to catch for long enough periods to deal significant damage. This is why her poke eventually wins out. Unlike most poke champions she is only countered by ranged kill-lanes, because she's way too good at kiting melees.
Riven can engage on you with her dash + 3rd Q if you engage at the same moment as kalista does, then a stun will get her pinned down and you start attacking with basic attacks. After that, you just stick on her because she is too close again.Riven does have high mobility indeed, but she is still countered by kiting, which Kalista has very good tools for.
Uhm... yea but I didn't say he was a counter did i?Pantheon does have a chance due to being able to poke in slightly better conditions(spearshot not being blocked by minions) and due to his engage dealing very high guaranteed damage.
Indeed, so Darius wins his lane.Darius doesn't have a chance, because a good Kalista will never let him close enough to be pulled in.
Does that takes away that they are top lane champions?Gnar isn't melee. Yorick practically has ranged poke.
You don't appear to understand the concept of poking in lane. Her dashes aren't only about running away. They are about kiting while moving at full speed or even slightly higher.So you want me to believe that kalista will dash back every time you come even near her? Sounds like a winning lane because Kalista has 0 farm and exp.
Kalista will engage on you eventually. At that moment, you have time to engage by yourself. If you do that right, Kalista will be standing next to you. From that moment she has 0 escape because she cannot outdash movement. (Try it before saying that this isnt true.)
Riven can engage on you with her dash + 3rd Q if you engage at the same moment as kalista does, then a stun will get her pinned down and you start attacking with basic attacks. After that, you just stick on her because she is too close again.
Indeed, so Darius wins his lane.
Kalista is afraid of Darius. Should be afraid at least.
If Kalista comes too close, she will be killed. So she has to keep her distance.
Darius can either zone her or she will have to kite him and at that moment, Darius can engage and burst her.
Does that takes away that they are top lane champions?
We are talking about a potential new top laner, as you want her to be. IF she would be a counter to melee champions. THEN DON'T TAKE A MELEE CHAMPION!!!
I just say that there are still a good number of top laners that can win their lane against Kalista no matter their range, playing style, or whatever.
You don't appear to understand the concept of poking in lane. Her dashes aren't only about running away. They are about kiting while moving at full speed or even slightly higher.[/QOUTE]
I know that her dashes are to dodge, keep distance, escape, engage, etc. But does that have anything to do with the concept of poking in lane?
If I don't understand the concept of poking... then please tell me what part I don't understand.
I think you mean her pierce(Q) because she has to engage to 550 range to attack with her basic attacks.She doesn't have to engage, because the poke is quite devastating alone.
We have compared her Q to Nidalee's Q hitting on 50% of the distance.
The max distance is a bit higher on Nidalee's Javelin toss but is unnoticeable as a poke.
Mana costs are the same. (considered nidalee as a caster)
Nidalee has a lower cooldown and thus increasing final damge by 33% (2/6)
Nidalee has more damage than Kalista if she buys AP. If she buys AD, Kalista will outdamage Nidalee on Q lvl 3
Kalista's poke is not high.
Kalista has a 550 basic attack range. Her dash will be either not, sideways or towards riven as long as she wants to deal some damage.A riven needs to start close to engage on her, which is why a good Kalista will not let it happen. It's the same as any ranged champion, except that it's easier. If riven uses her abilities to get close, her damage will be low.
Riven can and will outdash 550 range with her Q and E and can stun Kalista before she manages to escape.
(This has been tried numberless times to get to this conclusion.)
I think you haven't thought about that Darius can pull Kalista to him as his pull range is (almost) the same as Kalista's basic attack range.Darius loses the lane precisely because he can't engage, which lets Kalista poke her indefinitely. Due to Rend her poke is strong enough to not be outlasted.
What do you mean with cannot engage?
Saying random statements is also weird... Your statement is true but it doesn't give me any information to what we discuss.Ranked isn't everything.
This can mean 2 things. I think you wanted to say "but they're less about playstyle than champion choice."Kalista does have counters, yes, but they're not so much about playstyle than champion choice.
In that case, yes AND no.
Yes because kalista can be a total bully to some champions for example Udyr no matter how you play (as Udyr).
No because your playing style is everything you can count on when you are playing against any kiting champion. You have to use your opponents mobility to engage on them. This is the same playing style as you need with Quinn or really good Vaynes. (Vayne's kiting is only strong if she can outdamage you.)
"high damage" is a bit overrated. Kalista has decreased attack speed because of her dash, her poke is not very high and she is missing 2 abilities including her ult.tl;dr - Kalista is exactly about being hard to engage on, which, in combination with her high damage currently makes her very strong as a toplaner.
Apparently you haven't read what I wrote previously, because I'm speaking of personal experience, not theory.
Let me give you a real example of feedback of champions.
This one is about Ziggs not very long ago. (These are short summaries of the whole post.)
Feedback 1:
"Ziggs is a champion that has high AoE damage on long range with high initiating damage on close range.
He has a good escape and has very dangerous crowd control.
Conclusion: Ziggs is OP!"
Feedback 2:
"Ziggs is a champion with very low single target damage, bad escape and hugh mana consumption. He has very low crowd control and is very squishy.
Conclusion: Ziggs is not viable under any sircumstances."
Now which one is right?
Except for the conclusions, they both are.
These feedbacks are personal experiece. The first one was made by an Udyr who played as a jungler against Ziggs. The second one is made by a Ziggs player who was in lane against a Syndra.
In the first one, Ziggs was a good player who knew how to play him and how to lane.
His high damage came from the fact that he had better/more items than his opponents. The Crowd Control facts are because he knew how to use his abilities. (Satchel Charge's effect increases with the right positioning and timing. Aka an ability that scales with player skill.)
In the second one, the Ziggs was already behind and had low damage compared to the initiation of syndra. He didn't care about being low on mana and was not very good in landing his knockback. The squishy part is just a disadvantage of every caster with low health, armor and magic resist.
But as I said, they are both true.
The problem is that they are based on personal experience and therefor the skill of the player has very much impact on the conclusions.
The power of the champion must not include the skill of the player because that one is different for each and every player. You can determine different powers based on certain skill levels but you cannot compare them any more.
Personal experience don't matter to call a champion OP.
Saying random statements is also weird... Your statement is true but it doesn't give me any information to what we discuss.
This can mean 2 things. I think you wanted to say "but they're less about playstyle than champion choice."
In that case, yes AND no.
Yes because kalista can be a total bully to some champions for example Udyr no matter how you play (as Udyr).
No because your playing style is everything you can count on when you are playing against any kiting champion. You have to use your opponents mobility to engage on them. This is the same playing style as you need with Quinn or really good Vaynes. (Vayne's kiting is only strong if she can outdamage you.)
"high damage" is a bit overrated. Kalista has decreased attack speed because of her dash, her poke is not very high and she is missing 2 abilities including her ult.