• 🏆 Texturing Contest #33 is OPEN! Contestants must re-texture a SD unit model found in-game (Warcraft 3 Classic), recreating the unit into a peaceful NPC version. 🔗Click here to enter!
  • It's time for the first HD Modeling Contest of 2024. Join the theme discussion for Hive's HD Modeling Contest #6! Click here to post your idea!

The Internet Doomed?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Level 34
Joined
Sep 6, 2006
Messages
8,873
But its like 5% of 16 yr's and under are smart the 95% are just like when a hillbilly meets a Toaster or his sister. (Retarded) (i can back this up with prove of cause just look at people who listen to Rap or fight of a silly address code.)

I laughed when I read this. When you bash someone(s) please be sure not to make errors like "back this up with prove of cause just look". It just doesn't make you look any older or more mature than the people you are bashing. By the way, aren't you 16? What category are you in?

"fight of a silly address code" what does this mean?
 
Level 9
Joined
Oct 15, 2006
Messages
339
SUN: The Sun’s magnetic field is over 230 percent stronger now than it was at the beginning of the 1900s, and its overall energetic activity has sizably increased, creating a frenzy of activity that continues to embarrass NASA’s official predictions.

VENUS: Venus is now glowing in the dark, as is Jupiter’s moon Io.

EARTH: In the last 30 years, Earth’s icecaps have thinned out by as much as 40 percent. Quite inexplicably, just since 1997 the structure of the Earth has shifted from being slightly more egg-shaped, or elongated at the poles, to more pumpkin-shaped, or flattened at the poles. No one at NASA has even bothered to try to explain this yet. Link to full article at NASA.

MARS: The icecaps of Mars noticeably melted just within one year, causing 50-percent changes in surface features. Atmospheric density had risen by 200 percent above previous observations as of 1997.

JUPITER: Jupiter has become so highly energized that it is now surrounded by a visibly glowing donut tube of energy in the path of the moon Io. The size of Jupiter’s magnetic field has more than doubled since 1992.

SATURN: Saturn’s polar regions have been noticeably brightening, and its magnetic field strength increasing.

URANUS: According to NASA’s Voyager II space probe, Uranus and Neptune both appear to have had recent magnetic pole shifts – 60 degrees for Uranus and 50 for Neptune.

NEPTUNE: Neptune has become 40 percent brighter in infrared since 1996, and is fully 100-percent brighter in certain areas. Also, Neptune’s moon Triton has had a “very large percentage increase” in atmospheric pressure and temperature, comparable to a 22-degree Fahrenheit increase on Earth.

PLUTO: As of September 2002, Pluto has experienced a 300-percent increase in its atmospheric pressure in the last 14 years, while also becoming noticeably darker in color.
 
Level 10
Joined
Mar 31, 2007
Messages
499
How does global warming and planets relate to this topic? let this thread die or close it if you guys are going to continue to be off topic.
 
Level 9
Joined
Oct 15, 2006
Messages
339
Our solar system has an ongoing surge of energy within it. There is nothing unnatrual about our global warming. It is not caused by the work of man. It has been forseen as a process of transitioning from one world (the age of Piscies) to the new world (age of Aquarius) throughout history. All ancient cultures recall the "death" and "birth" of the world, atleast 4 times, if not more. It's a cycle of the Sun. And when the Sun starts acting up and adjusting it's magnetic field, so, too does the Earth change it's magnetic field to keep the relationship it has with the Sun. When this polar-shift, as it is called, happens, which it is currently happening but takes a few hundred years to complete, the Earth loses some of it's magnetic field. It's a magnetic field in transition, you cannot expect it to have the same strength. So this automaticallt decreases our "defense" from the Sun's radiating waves that heat our planet.
However, the Earth cannot trap in heat. Along with the seasons, the side furthest from the Sun is always being equalized by the lack of the Sun's radiation. The Earth does not radiate heat except from that which comes from the Sun. Had we no Sun, though the Earth's core is hot, it would have become similar to the moon long ago.
It is not by the work of man that is causing global warming, although it is helping to increase helthier living on a personal and societal level.

I can't close it.. I'm not a moderator like you
 
Level 9
Joined
Oct 15, 2006
Messages
339
polar shift is equivilant to the Earth titling a certain degree on it's axis. This means where it was hot/warm will be cold/cool and vice-versa... but not everywhere.

Many cataclysmic events will happen; tsunamis, earthquakes, flooding, volcanic eruptions, etc. These are all due to gravity and our magnetic field being manipulated by, mainly the Sun and Moon, but all other cosmic bodies in our solar-system as well.

There is a tug-of-war between two celestial bodies, and there is no such thing as a circular orbit. Orbits are elongated like an egg and this helps establish a balance of boundaries. That means, the Earth can only get so far away and so close to the Sun, but no further and no closer.
With our decrease in magnetic field due to the Sun, the Moon's mass is helping to literally pull apart and mash together tectonic plates. This creates prime conditions for the natural disasters. The heat allows for greater hurricanes, in power, size and life-span. The dry condition allows for extreme winds.

Everything is normal and the way it should be. Balance/moderation is a law of the universe.

And i know he is not a moderator, i was being sarcastic, but he sure acts like one!

:p
 
Level 9
Joined
Oct 15, 2006
Messages
339
Did you even read the post?

He's saying that because of this, the Earth will be unable to trap as much heat, and so it will become cooler, possibly even drastically dropping in temperature.

To drop it down to anyman's level: EARTH GON GET COLD.

Well there are two view-points to global warming.

1) It's natural

This conclusion is made by a heaping mound of evidence from all over the world from all different cultures. Of course this takes some faith in prophecy/astrology, and a fact that our ancestors have witnessed this before, etc.

2) It's man made.

Yeah there is a lot of pollution, and i am speaking of air pollution specifically as opposed to gorund pollution, but it is usually in concentrated spots. In L.A./Holywood, for example, which is a mountanous-coastal area, the winds from the ocean are not strong enough to carry the dense pollution over the mountains. That's why it's always hazy there.
The problem with this conclusion is that people only see what they want to see. For example, you have 8 million people living in New York's Manhattan island. Anyone living there is going to think their "world" is "over-crowded". Maybe THEIR world is over-crowded, but THE world is not. The entire population of the world could fit into the size of Rhode Island comfortably and COULD fit into the size of Jacksonville, Florida with room to spare.

There is a huge world out there where there is plenty of room for pollution to be filtered through nature's way of self-cleansing; oceans and trees and soil.

Gettting back to the issue.
If it is happening naturally then we are not going to have an ice-age no matter how hot it becomes. WARMING, in of itself, cannot create an ice-age. The planets will adjust, who knows why they do in the first place, but they are and the will and it will finish. All things will be peacefully happy with the self-cleansing.

If it is happening from the work of man, then there is a build-up of Co2 (that would in reality take hundreds of years from now) that will block the Sun's warming waves. So, after the warming waves are stopped, the INITIAL heat will dissipate and there you have your ice-age.

What's an ice-age? No, the ENTIRE planet was never covered with ice before, it's always been around the Sun. Well, how could we have ice-ages in the past when there were no Co2 emissions coming from fossil fules? It must be a natural order! It's a shift of the magnetic poles. The axis shifts, the magnetic poles shift, certain parts of the Earth are closer to the Sun during summer, for example, than before so the seasons change as well.
The only reason why we have seasons is because of the angle of the Sun's radiation in relationship to the place that is cold. If you have a sphere to your left and a sphere to your right
O--o
the radiating waves from the sphere on the left do not hit directly on the surface near the top of the sphere on the right, they are mostly reflected. When the axis tilts, those poles will be closer to the Sun.

It is not "democracy" the US wants to spread in the middle-east, it's capitalism. The same vice that will have you believe false ideas (Y2K for example) to get you to BUY stuff! The irony is that because it's backed by scientists, it's the major corporations that need to change to be more green -more than anyone else. The only problem is, free-energy technology has existed for almost 150 years. Each "piece" of "newgen" technology will come out every Xdecade before they lose trillions in money.
 
Level 24
Joined
Jun 26, 2006
Messages
3,406
Is it rude of me to read only the first post, then go to the last page, and wonder how the topic went from the potential muck-down of the internet to global warming? Just in case it is, and for potential lulz, I think I'm going to read the last page or two...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top