- Joined
- Jul 18, 2008
- Messages
- 4,866
Yes there have been even more serious ones from the Pompei and various other eruptions or great floods and earthquakes. We are talking about frequency here, from China and New Orleans to Haiti, Chile, Japan, parts of Australia floods, now Missouri's tornadoes, this except China and New Orleans happened for just the last 3-4 years..
One emission of the news three diasasters and if this is normal the climate has indeed changed, somehow I fail to become ignorant calling it 'nothing new'...
Well note some things, it's easier to correlate data from around the world now into a manor that shows the true frequency of such events, going really far back best sources we've got are unreliable or only reliable for a small, isolated area.
As for the change in climate, that could be natural or man-made sources - a predictor for the end of the world? No - an avoidable nuisance in the future? Possibly. It's hard to formulate an exact stance on Global warming itself in that there's many sources, both natural and man-made that could constitute the majority of it - as for the issue itself, I think it's often used to distract as it's very often simply dismissed when arguing from a political stance (where facts are often manipulated to sway, or even ignored completely) when there's so many more problems that result from carbon emissions that we can much more obviously see (unhealthy air conditions in cities, acid rain, etc.).
Basically if anything's coming, we have plenty of time to see it coming (with the sort of thing people normally point to for end of the world scenarios) so instant end of the world scenarios are just sensationalist annoyances.